CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Anti-profiteering
Under the anti-profiteering provision of the CGST Act, 2017, which of the following must be passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices?
Both a reduction in the rate of tax on a supply and the benefit of input tax credit must be passed on to the recipient through a commensurate reduction in prices, as Section 171(1) of the CGST Act provides. Neither benefit alone is covered.
- AAny reduction in the rate of tax on a supply or the benefit of input tax creditCorrect
- BOnly the benefit of a reduction in the rate of tax, not input tax credit
- COnly the benefit of input tax credit, not a reduction in tax rate
- DAny increase in the rate of tax on a supply of goods or services
Explanation
Section 171(1) requires that any reduction in the rate of tax on any supply of goods or services, or the benefit of input tax credit, be passed on to the recipient through a commensurate reduction in prices. Options covering only one of the two benefits are incomplete, and a tax rate increase is not covered by the provision.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Anti-profiteering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Anti-profiteering questions
- Following a rate cut, an Authority finds that Sai Foods Ltd. profiteered Rs 8,00,000 and passes an order on 1 March. Consider the following:…
- Under the CGST Rules, 2017, the Director General of Anti-profiteering must complete the investigation within a stated period from receipt of…
- The Director General of Anti-profiteering received a reference on 10 January. He has obtained the maximum extension permitted under the CGST…
- The Authority passes an order on 10 March holding that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000. The company deposits the full profiteered…
- The Authority concludes that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000 by not passing on a tax rate reduction. The company does not deposit…
- A manufacturer received an order in which the Authority held that it profiteered Rs 15,00,000. It deposited Rs 15,00,000 on the 45th day aft…