CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Anti-profiteering
Under the CGST Rules, 2017, the Director General of Anti-profiteering must complete the investigation within a stated period from receipt of the Standing Committee's reference. Which statement is correct?
The Director General must complete the investigation within six months of receiving the Standing Committee's reference. This can be extended by up to a further three months, for reasons recorded in writing, as allowed by the Authority, after which a report goes to the Authority.
- ASix months, extendable by a further period not exceeding three months for reasons recorded in writing, as allowed by the AuthorityCorrect
- BThree months, extendable by a further period not exceeding six months, as allowed by the Standing Committee
- CSix months, with no extension permitted under any circumstances
- DTwelve months, extendable by a further three months at the DG's own discretion
Explanation
Rule 129(6) gives six months from receipt of the reference, extendable by not more than three further months for reasons recorded in writing, as allowed by the Authority. The three-month base period and the Standing Committee's power to extend were replaced by amendments.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Anti-profiteering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Anti-profiteering questions
- Following a rate cut, an Authority finds that Sai Foods Ltd. profiteered Rs 8,00,000 and passes an order on 1 March. Consider the following:…
- The Authority passes an order on 10 March holding that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000. The company deposits the full profiteered…
- The Authority concludes that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000 by not passing on a tax rate reduction. The company does not deposit…
- The Director General of Anti-profiteering received a reference on 10 January. He has obtained the maximum extension permitted under the CGST…
- A manufacturer received an order in which the Authority held that it profiteered Rs 15,00,000. It deposited Rs 15,00,000 on the 45th day aft…
- During an anti-profiteering proceeding, a party supplies commercial data on a confidential basis, and says it cannot be summarised. Under th…