CMA Final · Indirect Tax Laws and Practice · Anti-profiteering
The Authority concludes that Sundaram Foods Ltd profiteered Rs 6,50,000 by not passing on a tax rate reduction. The company does not deposit the amount within thirty days of the order. What is the penalty leviable under the Act?
The penalty is Rs 65,000, being ten per cent of the profiteered amount of Rs 6,50,000. Since the company did not deposit the profiteered amount within thirty days of the order, the proviso granting relief does not apply and the full ten per cent penalty is leviable.
- ARs 65,000Correct
- BRs 6,50,000
- CRs 32,500
- DNil, because penalty applies only on a second default
Explanation
Penalty is ten per cent of the amount profiteered. 10% of 6,50,000 is Rs 65,000. The proviso for nil penalty applies only if deposit is made within thirty days, which was not done. Rs 32,500 wrongly uses five per cent.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Anti-profiteering shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Anti-profiteering questions
- The Authority passes an order on 5 March holding that Sudarshan Foods Pvt Ltd profiteered Rs 4,00,000 by not passing on ITC benefit. The com…
- The Director General of Anti-profiteering received a reference on 10 January. He has obtained the maximum extension permitted under the CGST…
- A manufacturer received an order in which the Authority held that it profiteered Rs 15,00,000. It deposited Rs 15,00,000 on the 45th day aft…
- During an anti-profiteering proceeding, a party supplies commercial data on a confidential basis, and says it cannot be summarised. Under th…
- Under the anti-profiteering provision of the CGST Act, 2017, the penalty on a registered person found to have profiteered is equal to what p…
- The Director General of Anti-profiteering receives a reference from the Standing Committee on 1 February. Under the Rules, by when must the …