CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice · Bankruptcy for Individuals and Partnership Firms
Vikram Traders, a proprietary firm, defaulted on a loan of Rs 80,000 to a bank, and the Central Government has not notified any higher minimum default amount. The bank wants to know whether Part III of the Code applies to this default, and which entities fall within the Code's application clauses covering persons other than companies and LLPs. Which statement is correct?
Part III applies because the default of Rs 80,000 is above the Rs 1,000 minimum, and no higher threshold has been notified. Section 2 covers partnership and proprietorship firms, personal guarantors and individuals. The Rs 1 lakh figure is only the maximum the Government may notify.
- APart III applies, since the default is not less than Rs 1,000 and proprietorship firms are covered along with partnership firms, personal guarantors and individualsCorrect
- BPart III does not apply, as the default must be at least Rs 1 lakh
- CPart III applies only to partnership firms and not to proprietorship firms
- DPart III applies only if the default exceeds Rs 1 crore
Explanation
Section 78 applies Part III where the default is not less than Rs 1,000, with the Central Government able to notify a higher minimum not exceeding Rs 1 lakh; none has been notified here, so Rs 80,000 qualifies. Section 2 covers personal guarantors, partnership and proprietorship firms and individuals. Option B wrongly treats the Rs 1 lakh ceiling as the floor.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Bankruptcy for Individuals and Partnership Firms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Bankruptcy for Individuals and Partnership Firms questions
- Ramesh Iyer, a sole trader, lives and runs his hardware shop in Coimbatore. A creditor wishes to file an insolvency application against him …
- After a bankruptcy order is passed against Anil Verma, an unsecured creditor, Sharma Finance, wants to file a recovery suit against him for …
- Deepa Nair was adjudged bankrupt, and the Adjudicating Authority later passed an order discharging her under section 138. Which description …
- A bankruptcy order under section 126 is made against the partnership firm Mehta & Sons, which has three partners. Under the Code's definitio…
- Mehta Traders, a partnership firm in Surat, is adjudged bankrupt by a bankruptcy order under section 126 of the Code. Rohan and Kavita were …
- A suit was filed against Meera Nair, an individual debtor, in a civil court, and a dispute has arisen on the priority of a creditor's claim …