Skip to content

ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Financial Management · Valuation for acquisitions and mergers

Which of the following is a recognised limitation of using the dividend valuation model to value a target company's shares in an acquisition?

The key limitation is that the model is very sensitive to the growth rate and cost of equity estimates, and it reflects dividends to a minority shareholder rather than the benefits of control or synergies in an acquisition. It does not use free cash flows or WACC.

  1. AIt is highly sensitive to the estimated growth rate and cost of equity, and values only a minority holding's dividend stream rather than control benefitsCorrect
  2. BIt cannot be applied to any company that pays a dividend
  3. CIt automatically includes the value of synergies from the combination
  4. DIt uses free cash flows to the firm discounted at the WACC

Explanation

The model discounts expected dividends, so small changes in g or ke change value greatly, and it reflects a minority investor's cash flows, not control or synergy. It is designed for dividend-paying firms and does not use FCFF or WACC.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Valuation for acquisitions and mergers shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Valuation for acquisitions and mergers questions