FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects
Which statement about close-out netting is most accurate?
Close-out netting lowers credit exposure at default by offsetting positive and negative values, but trades still carry market risk before default. It never increases exposure above the gross amount, and it is a core feature of OTC derivative master agreements.
- AIt reduces credit exposure at default but does not remove market risk on the trades before defaultCorrect
- BIt eliminates credit exposure whenever trades have opposite signs
- CIt increases exposure when trades are of the same sign
- DIt applies only to exchange-traded futures and never to OTC contracts
Explanation
Netting reduces the claim in default by combining positive and negative values; it never exceeds gross exposure and cannot increase it. Trades remain subject to market movements until default, and netting is widely used for OTC derivatives. It only fully removes exposure if net value is non-positive.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects questions
- A bank's netting opinion for Country X covers banks incorporated there but has no coverage for branches of foreign firms. The bank trades wi…
- A risk manager explains why close-out netting differs from ordinary bilateral set-off under general insolvency law. Which statement is most …
- A dealer faces a counterparty under an ISDA master agreement. Trades have values to the dealer of +12, +7, -9 and -4 (millions). Legal opini…
- A bank has a portfolio of trades with a counterparty in a jurisdiction where no legal opinion on close-out netting exists. The gross positiv…
- A bank trades with a hedge fund under an ISDA Master Agreement with a Credit Support Annex (CSA). The portfolio's net mark-to-market value t…
- A bank has a bilateral ISDA with Counterparty X covering three trades with mark-to-market values of +40 million, -25 million and +10 million…