Skip to content

CMA Final · Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · GAAR

Which statement about the Approving Panel under the GAAR procedure is correct?

The Approving Panel is chaired by a current or former High Court judge, with an income-tax officer member and an expert academic member. Its directions on whether GAAR applies are binding on both the assessee and the Assessing Officer, not merely advisory.

  1. AIt is headed by a retired High Court judge as chairperson and its directions are binding on the assessee and the Assessing OfficerCorrect
  2. BIt is headed by the Assessing Officer and its view is only advisory
  3. CIt consists solely of Chartered Accountants nominated by ICAI
  4. DIt can be approached by the assessee only after paying the full disputed tax

Explanation

The Approving Panel is chaired by a person who is or has been a High Court judge, with a member from the Indian Revenue Service and an academic or scholar member. Its directions bind the assessee and the tax authority, so the advisory and ICAI-only options are wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on GAAR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More GAAR questions