Skip to content

CS Professional · Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics and Cyber Security - Laws and Practice · Cyber Security

Which statement about the liability of an 'intermediary' under the IT Act, 2000 is correct?

An intermediary enjoys safe harbour for third-party content if it only provides access, does not initiate or modify transmissions, and follows due diligence. The protection is lost if it abets the unlawful act or does not remove content after actual knowledge or a government notice.

  1. AAn intermediary is always liable for every third-party content hosted on its platform
  2. BAn intermediary may be exempt from liability for third-party content if it merely provides access, does not initiate or modify the transmission, and observes due diligence, losing the exemption on failing to act after actual knowledge or government noticeCorrect
  3. CAn intermediary is exempt from liability even if it conspires or abets the unlawful act
  4. DOnly the Central Government can be an intermediary

Explanation

The safe harbour under Section 79 protects intermediaries that act as passive conduits and observe due diligence. It is lost if the intermediary conspires, abets or induces the unlawful act, or fails to remove the content expeditiously after actual knowledge or a government notification. Blanket liability or blanket immunity is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Cyber Security shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Cyber Security questions