IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Actuarial Mathematics for Modelling · Duration, convexity and immunisation
Which statement about volatility (modified duration) is correct for a bond with fixed positive cashflows?
Volatility is approximately the proportional fall in price for a unit rise in yield, defined as minus (1/V) times dV/di. It differs from Macaulay duration by the factor 1/(1+i), falls with higher coupons, and never exceeds the final term.
- AIt is the proportional fall in price for a unit rise in yield, approximatelyCorrect
- BIt equals the weighted mean term of payments without any adjustment
- CIt increases when coupons are raised, other terms unchanged
- DIt is unaffected by the level of the yield
- It is always greater than the term to maturity
Explanation
Volatility = -(1/V)dV/di, the proportional price fall per unit yield rise. The mean term is Macaulay duration, not volatility. Higher coupons shorten duration, and duration never exceeds term for positive cashflows.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Duration, convexity and immunisation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Duration, convexity and immunisation questions
- A fund holds a single zero-coupon bond paying Rs 100,000 in exactly 10 years. The effective annual yield is 5%. Using the definition of conv…
- Which of the following is a genuine practical limitation of Redington immunisation for a long-term liability portfolio?
- Which statement about convexity in the context of Redington immunisation is correct?
- Under Redington's theory of immunisation, which of the following sets correctly states the conditions that must hold at the current valuatio…
- A bond portfolio has a volatility of 6.50 and a current value of Rs 40,00,000 at a yield of 7% effective. Using the first-order volatility a…
- An Indian insurer must pay Rs 1,00,000 in exactly 6 years. It will hold only two zero-coupon bonds, maturing in 3 years and 8 years, chosen …