CA Final · Direct Tax Laws & International Taxation · Tax Planning, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion
Zenith Holdings Ltd, a non-resident company incorporated in Country X, wishes to claim relief under the India-Country X tax agreement. It holds a tax residency certificate issued by the Government of Country X. Considering section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, which statement is correct?
A non-resident claiming treaty relief must obtain a certificate of residence from the Government of the other country or specified territory and must also provide the other documents and information that are prescribed. The residence certificate alone does not satisfy the requirement.
- AA certificate of residence from the Government of Country X is enough, and no other documents or information are needed
- BNo certificate is required for a company
- CThe assessee must obtain a residence certificate from the Government of that country and also provide such other documents and information as may be prescribedCorrect
- DThe certificate must be obtained from the Indian Assessing Officer
Explanation
Section 159(8) requires a non-resident to obtain a certificate of residence from the Government of the other country or specified territory and also to provide such other documents and information as may be prescribed. The certificate alone is not sufficient, so the first option is wrong.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Tax Planning, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Tax Planning, Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion questions
- Under Section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, India has an agreement with country X. Kiran Ltd, a company resident in a third country Y, ro…
- Mehta Textiles Ltd, an Indian company, is under investigation for concealing income. Anil, a former accountant of the company who was privy …
- Kiran Pvt Ltd, an Indian company, is in a tax dispute. The Central Government tendered immunity to Mr. Anil, who was indirectly concerned in…
- A part of an arrangement entered into by Sundaram Holdings Ltd is declared to be an impermissible avoidance arrangement. Under Rule 127 of t…
- Rohan Mehta was involved in concealing income along with a firm's partners. The Central Government wants his evidence against the others. As…
- Immunity was tendered under section 519 to Sunil Agarwal, who accepted it. Later, the Central Government finds that he wilfully concealed ma…