ACCA Applied Knowledge · Business and Technology
Stakeholders in business organisations: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Internal stakeholders
- Internal = work within the organisation
- Directors, managers, employees. They are inside the organisation.
- Connected stakeholders
- Connected = direct economic or contractual link, but not inside
- Shareholders, lenders, customers, suppliers. Some texts class shareholders as internal, so follow the wording of the question.
- External stakeholders
- External = no direct contract, but affect or are affected
- Government, regulators, community, pressure groups, media.
- Primary stakeholder
- Primary = organisation cannot survive without their continued participation
- Typically shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, lenders.
- Secondary stakeholder
- Secondary = can influence or be affected, but not essential to survival
- Typically media, pressure groups, wider community.
- Key players
- High power + High interest → Key players
- Manage closely. Involve in decisions, consult often, aim for their support.
- Keep satisfied
- High power + Low interest → Keep satisfied
- Keep content and avoid unpleasant surprises. They may move to key players if their interest rises.
- Keep informed
- Low power + High interest → Keep informed
- Provide regular information and listen to views. They can lobby or form alliances with powerful groups.
- Minimal effort
- Low power + Low interest → Minimal effort
- Monitor only. Do not spend significant resources.
- Power-interest engagement rule
- High power + high interest = manage closely; High power + low interest = keep satisfied; Low power + high interest = keep informed; Low power + low interest = monitor
- This is Mendelow's approach. Match the strategy to the correct box, and state the reason.
- Levels of engagement
- Inform (one-way) → Consult (two-way, views sought) → Involve (shared decisions)
- The more power and interest a group has, the further along this scale the organisation should go.
- Sources of stakeholder influence
- Formal (voting, law) | Economic (money, custom, supply) | Collective (strikes, campaigns) | Indirect (media, government)
- Use this list to explain how a given group can affect the organisation.
- Shareholder view in one line
- Purpose = maximise shareholder wealth, within the law and ethical custom
- Friedman's position. Managers act as agents of the owners.
- Stakeholder view in one line
- Purpose = balance the interests of all stakeholder groups
- Stakeholders are those who affect or are affected by the organisation.
- Key link
- Stakeholder care → long-term sustainability → long-term shareholder value
- The enlightened shareholder argument. Use it when a question asks if the views conflict.
Quick revision
- A stakeholder affects or is affected by the organisation.
- Internal stakeholders include employees and managers.
- Connected stakeholders include shareholders, lenders, customers and suppliers.
- External stakeholders include government, regulators, the community and pressure groups.
- Shareholders typically want returns through dividends and share price growth.
- Lenders want interest paid and the loan repaid safely.
- Mendelow's matrix uses two axes: power and interest.
- High power, high interest: manage closely.
- High power, low interest: keep satisfied.
- Low power, high interest: keep informed.
- Low power, low interest: minimal effort.
- Shareholder theory puts owners' wealth first; stakeholder theory balances the needs of all groups.
Common mistakes
- Classing shareholders as internal stakeholders. Fix: In the standard ACCA three-way split, shareholders are connected. They do not work in the organisation. Follow the wording of the question if it says otherwise.
- Treating customers and suppliers as external stakeholders. Fix: They have a direct commercial contract with the business, so they are connected.
- Giving the organisation's objective instead of the stakeholder's. Fix: Ask what this group personally gains from the organisation, such as pay, dividends or safe products.
- Saying all shareholders want the same thing. Fix: Note that some want dividends now and others want growth. Use this if the scenario hints at it.
- Putting the axes the wrong way round, for example calling a high-interest, low-power group 'keep satisfied'. Fix: Remember that the first word of each approach follows power: high power means key players or keep satisfied. Keep informed is for those who only care.
- Confusing key players with keep satisfied. Fix: Check interest. If the stakeholder is actively engaged, they are key players. If they are passive for now, they are keep satisfied.
- Treating all stakeholders as equally important. Fix: Always rank stakeholders by power and interest before choosing a strategy.
- Confusing informing with consulting. Fix: Informing is one-way. Consulting asks for views and expects a reply. Check whether the organisation is listening or only telling.
- Saying Friedman believed business should ignore ethics and the law. Fix: Add the condition: maximise profit while staying within the law and basic ethical custom.
- Thinking shareholders are not stakeholders. Fix: Shareholders are one stakeholder group. The theories differ in how much weight other groups get.
Exam tips
- Read the question wording. If it says to use internal, connected and external, do not switch to primary and secondary.
- In objective tests, look for the contract test: a contract usually means connected.
- Do not assume low power means low importance. A secondary stakeholder such as the media can still harm the business.
- For scenario questions, name the stakeholder, give the category and add one reason. That is how marks are earned.
- Revise this topic first, because Mendelow's matrix and stakeholder conflict questions assume you can classify groups correctly.
- Learn five standard pairings: shareholders v employees, shareholders v customers, shareholders v community, managers v shareholders and lenders v shareholders.
- In multiple response questions, read how many answers you must select and choose exactly that many.
- Use the scenario's exact words. A named cost cut points to a clash with employees, quality or the community.