ACCA Applied Knowledge · Business and Technology
Team formation, development and management: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Group versus team
- Group = people who interact and share an identity or interest. Team = group + common goal + complementary skills + joint accountability
- Use this to decide whether a scenario describes a group or a team.
- Formal versus informal group
- Formal = created by the organisation for a task. Informal = formed naturally from social relationships
- Informal groups have no official objectives but can help or harm the organisation.
- Virtual team
- Virtual team = geographically dispersed members + technology-based communication
- Remember the trade-off: wider talent and lower costs against weaker trust and bonding.
- Cross-functional team
- Cross-functional team = members from different departments + one shared task
- Benefit is varied expertise. Risk is divided loyalty.
- Self-managed team
- Self-managed team = team controls its own planning, organising and work allocation
- Needs skilled members and clear overall objectives from management.
- Action-oriented roles
- Shaper, Implementer, Completer-Finisher
- Shaper: driven, challenges the team. Implementer: turns plans into practical action. Completer-Finisher: checks detail and meets deadlines.
- People-oriented roles
- Coordinator, Teamworker, Resource Investigator
- Coordinator: clarifies goals and delegates. Teamworker: supportive, avoids friction. Resource Investigator: outgoing, finds outside contacts and opportunities.
- Thinking-oriented roles
- Plant, Monitor-Evaluator, Specialist
- Plant: creative, solves problems in unusual ways. Monitor-Evaluator: sober, weighs options logically. Specialist: provides deep knowledge in a narrow area.
- Balance rule
- Effective team = mix of roles, no key role missing, no harmful duplication
- Belbin's view is that balance helps effectiveness. It is a guide, not a guarantee of success.
- Tuckman's sequence
- Forming → Storming → Norming → Performing → Adjourning
- Learn the order. Adjourning was added later and is not always shown in the original four-stage model.
- Forming
- Uncertainty, politeness, dependence on the leader
- Manager: give clear direction, explain purpose, goals and roles, and make introductions.
- Storming
- Conflict, challenge to leader, competing views
- Manager: manage conflict, listen, clarify goals and roles, and keep the group focused on the task.
- Norming
- Agreed rules, cohesion, cooperation
- Manager: encourage openness, reinforce the group's agreed norms and involve members in decisions.
- Performing
- Trust, flexibility, high output
- Manager: delegate, set stretching goals and give recognition. Avoid over-controlling.
- Adjourning
- Task complete, group disbands
- Manager: recognise achievement, review lessons learned and support members as they move on.
- Handy's team effectiveness model
- Givens (group, task, environment) + Intervening factors (leadership style, processes, motivation) → Outcomes (productivity, satisfaction)
- Managers influence the intervening factors most. Learn all three headings and their parts.
- Symptoms of groupthink (Janis)
- Illusion of invulnerability + collective rationalisation + belief in the group's morality + stereotyping of outsiders + pressure on dissenters + self-censorship + illusion of unanimity + mindguards
- You do not need all eight in an answer. Learn a few and apply them to the scenario.
- Cohesion and performance
- High cohesion + norms that support goals → high performance; high cohesion + norms against goals → low performance
- Cohesion alone does not decide performance. The direction of the norms matters.
- Adair's three circles
- Task + Team + Individual needs
- The three overlap. A leader must balance all three, not just the task.
- Thomas-Kilmann: Competing
- High assertiveness, low cooperativeness
- Win-lose. Useful in emergencies or when a quick, unpopular decision is needed.
- Thomas-Kilmann: Collaborating
- High assertiveness, high cooperativeness
- Win-win. Best for important issues needing commitment, but slow.
- Thomas-Kilmann: Compromising
- Medium assertiveness, medium cooperativeness
- Each side gives something up. Useful when time is short or goals are equal in weight.
- Thomas-Kilmann: Avoiding
- Low assertiveness, low cooperativeness
- Sidestepping the issue. Fine for trivial matters or to let tempers cool.
- Thomas-Kilmann: Accommodating
- Low assertiveness, high cooperativeness
- Giving way to the other side. Useful to keep goodwill or when the issue matters more to them.
Quick revision
- A group is people who share a common interest or place; a team shares a common goal and works together interdependently to reach it.
- Team members in an effective team have complementary skills and are mutually accountable for results.
- Belbin's model says an effective team needs a balance of roles, not a group of identical people.
- Know each Belbin role by its main contribution and its allowable weakness.
- Tuckman's stages in order: forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning.
- Forming is polite and uncertain; storming brings conflict and challenge to leadership.
- Norming brings agreed rules and cohesion; performing is when the team works effectively towards its goals.
- Adjourning is when the team disbands after the task is done.
- Team building aims to improve cooperation, trust and performance, not just to be social.
- Conflict can be harmful or useful; the manager's job is to manage it, not always remove it.
- In scenario questions, pick the model by the clue words, then choose the answer that fits those clues exactly.
Common mistakes
- Treating the words group and team as identical Fix: Remember that a team needs a common goal, complementary skills and joint accountability. A group may have none of these.
- Saying informal groups are always harmful Fix: State both sides. They can support morale, communication and learning, but can also spread rumours or resist change.
- Confusing Plant and Shaper. Fix: A Plant generates original ideas and may be introverted. A Shaper pushes the team to act and meet targets, and may provoke others. Ideas means Plant; drive and pressure means Shaper.
- Confusing Coordinator with Shaper. Fix: The Coordinator clarifies objectives, delegates and draws out contributions calmly. The Shaper pushes hard and challenges. Calm delegation means Coordinator.
- Treating storming as a failure that the manager must stop immediately. Fix: Remember storming is a normal stage. The manager should manage and channel the conflict, not suppress it.
- Confusing norming with performing. Fix: Norming is about agreeing rules and building cohesion. Performing is about high output, trust and flexible roles.
- Saying high cohesion always means high performance. Fix: Remember that performance depends on whether the group's norms support the organisation's goals.
- Placing leadership style among the givens in Handy's model. Fix: Leadership style, processes and motivation are intervening factors. Givens are group, task and environment.
- Treating Adair's model as only about getting the task done. Fix: Always check all three circles. The model says neglecting team or individual needs eventually harms the task.
- Confusing compromising with collaborating. Fix: Compromising means each side gives something up. Collaborating means working together to find a solution that fully meets both sides' needs.
Exam tips
- Learn the one-line definition of group and team. Questions often test the extra features that make a group a team.
- For each team type, memorise two advantages and two disadvantages. Section B tasks may ask for either.
- Watch the clue words in the scenario. They usually point straight to one type.
- Remember that types can overlap. Pick the answer that fits the feature the question stresses.
- In multiple response questions, read the required number of answers and do not select more or fewer.
- Learn all nine roles with one keyword each. Most questions only need a quick match.
- Know the Plant versus Shaper difference cold, as it is the most common trap.
- In multi-task questions, name the role, then state the effect on the team. Naming alone often earns only part of the marks.