ACCA Applied Knowledge · Financial Accounting
Associates: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Significant influence presumption
- Voting power ≥ 20% → significant influence presumed
- Presumption only. It can be rebutted with clear evidence.
- No influence presumption
- Voting power < 20% → no significant influence presumed
- Can be rebutted, for example by board representation.
- Control indicator
- Voting power > 50% → control usually exists (subsidiary)
- Control under IFRS 10 depends on power, exposure to returns and ability to use power. Over 50% is the usual sign, not the full test.
- Classification summary
- Control → subsidiary (consolidate). Significant influence → associate (equity method). Neither → IFRS 9 investment.
- Always decide the classification before choosing the accounting.
- Definition of significant influence
- Power to participate in financial and operating policy decisions, without control or joint control
- Learn this wording for multiple choice questions.
- Investment in associate at year end
- Cost + share of post-acquisition profit (and OCI) − dividends received from the associate − impairment
- Use the associate's profit after tax. Share = group % held.
- Share of post-acquisition profit
- Associate's profit after tax since acquisition × group %
- For a full year after acquisition, use the whole year's profit. For a part year, time-apportion unless told otherwise.
- Alternative proof
- Group % × associate's net assets at year end + unimpaired goodwill, ignoring any unrealised profit adjustment
- Use this only as a check. It assumes the associate's net assets are at fair value.
- Associate in the statement of profit or loss
- Group % × associate's profit after tax for the period of ownership
- Shown as one line below group operating profit and finance costs. Dividends received are not shown as income.
- Significant influence indicator
- Holding of 20% or more of voting power is presumed to give significant influence
- It is a presumption, not a rule. Other evidence such as board representation can rebut it.
- Share of profit of associate
- Group % × associate's profit after tax for the year
- Shown as one line. Use profit after tax, and time-apportion if the holding was acquired part-way through the year.
- Adjusted share where unrealised profit exists
- Group % × associate's profit after tax − group share of unrealised profit (where the associate sold goods to the group)
- The adjustment for associate sales is usually made against the share of profit line and against inventory in the statement of financial position. Check the question wording.
- Position in the statement
- Group operating profit − finance costs + share of profit of associate = group profit before tax
- Group tax is then deducted. No associate revenue, costs or tax are added line by line.
- Dividend from associate
- Dividend received from associate = not included in group profit
- Remove it from the parent's investment income to avoid counting the profit twice.
- Significant influence
- Holding usually 20% to 50% of voting power
- This is a presumption, not an absolute rule. Other evidence of influence matters.
- Profit in closing inventory (mark-up on cost)
- Unrealised profit = inventory at transfer price × mark-up ÷ (100 + mark-up)
- Example: 25% mark-up means profit is 25/125 = 1/5 of the transfer price.
- Profit in closing inventory (margin on selling price)
- Unrealised profit = inventory at transfer price × margin %
- Example: a 20% margin means profit is 20% of the transfer price.
- Group share of unrealised profit (PUP)
- PUP = unrealised profit in inventory × group's % holding in the associate
- Never 100%. Use only the percentage the investor owns.
- Parent sells to associate
- Dr Group retained earnings (or parent's profit) ; Cr Investment in associate
- The inventory is held by the associate, so the investment is reduced.
- Associate sells to parent
- Dr Share of profit of associate (or retained earnings) ; Cr Group inventory
- The inventory is held by the group, so inventory is reduced.
- Associate balances
- Receivables and payables with the associate are not cancelled
- Show them as normal balances. Do not offset them against each other.
Quick revision
- An associate is an entity over which the investor has significant influence but not control.
- Holding 20% or more of voting power normally indicates significant influence, unless evidence shows otherwise.
- Over 50% voting power with control means a subsidiary, not an associate.
- Use the equity method: do not add the associate's assets and liabilities line by line.
- Carrying amount = cost + share of post-acquisition profit − dividends received − impairment.
- Dividends from the associate reduce the investment. They are not group income.
- In the consolidated statement of profit or loss, show the share of the associate's profit after tax as one line.
- Time apportion the associate's profit if you acquired it part-way through the year.
- There is no non-controlling interest for an associate.
- Intragroup sales to or from an associate are not eliminated in full. Only the group's share of unrealised profit is removed.
- If the parent sells to the associate, reduce the parent's profit and the investment. If the associate sells to the parent, reduce the associate profit share and group inventory.
- Check what is still in closing inventory. Only that part carries unrealised profit.
Common mistakes
- Treating 20% as an absolute rule that always makes an associate. Fix: Say 'presumed' every time. Check the scenario for evidence that rebuts the presumption.
- Saying a holding below 20% can never be an associate. Fix: A holding below 20% with board representation and policy involvement can still give significant influence.
- Adding the associate's assets and liabilities line by line Fix: Remember an associate is one line only. Ask whether the investor has control. If not, use one line.
- Using the whole of the associate's profit instead of the group share Fix: Always multiply the associate's profit by the group percentage. There is no non-controlling interest for an associate.
- Adding the associate's revenue and expenses line by line. Fix: Ask if there is control. If not, use one line only: share of profit of associate.
- Using profit before tax instead of profit after tax. Fix: Always take profit after tax for the associate. Its tax is already inside the line.
- Eliminating 100% of the unrealised profit instead of the group share. Fix: For an associate always multiply by the holding percentage. Write the percentage next to your working.
- Using the mark-up as if it were a margin, such as taking 25% of the transfer price. Fix: Mark-up is on cost, so use mark-up ÷ (100 + mark-up). Margin is on selling price, so multiply by the margin %.
Exam tips
- Learn the exact IAS 28 definition of significant influence. Multiple choice options often change one word.
- Use the words 'presumed' and 'rebutted'. Options that say '20% always means associate' are traps.
- Rule out subsidiary first. Control comes before significant influence in the classification order.
- Watch for clues such as board seats, technical help or interchange of managers. They point to influence below 20%.
- Remember the treatment: associates use the equity method, not line-by-line consolidation.
- In objective tests, check whether the question gives profit for the whole year or since acquisition before multiplying.
- Write the four-line working on scrap paper even for a quick question. It prevents missed dividend or OCI adjustments.
- For multiple response questions about associates, remember that the equity method does not include line-by-line consolidation or non-controlling interest.