ACCA Strategic Professional · Advanced Audit and Assurance (International)
Money laundering: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Three stages of laundering
- Placement → Layering → Integration
- Placement puts cash in the system. Layering hides the trail. Integration returns the money as apparently clean wealth. Stages can overlap or be skipped.
- Concealing offence
- Concealing = hiding, disguising, converting, transferring or removing criminal property
- Applies where the person knows or suspects the property is criminal property.
- Assisting offence
- Assisting = being involved in an arrangement that helps another person retain, use or control criminal property
- The person must know or suspect that the arrangement does this. The auditor can commit it by continuing work that facilitates the arrangement.
- Failure to report
- Know or suspect (or reasonable grounds to) + information came in the course of regulated work → report
- Report internally to the nominated officer. Exact tests vary by jurisdiction, so state the principle.
- Tipping off
- Tipping off = disclosing a report or investigation in a way likely to prejudice it
- Applies to the existence of a report or investigation, not to the underlying client transaction itself.
- Risk-based approach
- Assess risk (client, service, country, channel) → apply CDD or EDD in proportion → monitor
- Higher risk means deeper checks. Low risk may allow simplified checks, but never no checks.
- Core CDD elements
- Identify + Verify + Beneficial owner + Purpose of relationship + Ongoing monitoring
- Use this list to structure any CDD answer.
- Firm AML controls
- Risk assessment + Policies + CDD + Records + Training + MLRO + Reporting + Review
- A gap in any one of these is a weakness to report in a scenario.
- Internal reporting chain
- Staff member → MLRO → national authority (if suspicion is justified)
- Report suspicion promptly. Do not tip off the client.
- When EDD applies
- PEP, high-risk country, complex structure, unusual transactions, no face-to-face contact
- Typical triggers. Under EDD, add senior approval and source of funds and wealth checks.
- Record keeping
- Keep CDD evidence and transaction records for the period the local law requires
- Do not quote a number of years unless the question gives one. Say 'the statutory period'.
- Trigger for internal report
- Knowledge OR suspicion OR reasonable grounds for suspicion → report to MLRO
- Exact wording depends on local law. Proof is not needed. Report as soon as practicable.
- Reporting chain
- Engagement team → MLRO → authority (SAR)
- The MLRO decides whether to file. The team does not contact the authority or client directly.
- Tipping off rule
- Disclosure to client that a report was made or an investigation exists, likely to prejudice it = offence
- Applies to the SAR, the investigation and the content. Check the exact local offence.
- Confidentiality override
- Legal requirement to disclose > duty of confidentiality
- Disclosure under law is permitted. Do not disclose beyond what the law requires.
- Documentation
- Record the facts, the report date and the MLRO's decision on a restricted file
- Keep SAR details out of the normal audit file that the client or others could see.
Quick revision
- Money laundering turns proceeds of crime into apparently legitimate funds.
- Three stages: placement, layering, integration.
- Placement puts criminal cash into the financial system.
- Layering hides the source through complex transactions.
- Integration returns the funds as apparently clean wealth.
- Firms need risk-based procedures, including client due diligence and ongoing monitoring.
- Keep records of identification and of decisions taken.
- Staff report suspicions internally to the nominated officer.
- Tipping off a client about a report or investigation is an offence in many jurisdictions.
- Consider the effect on client acceptance, continuance and the audit opinion.
- Link suspicion to ISA 250 on laws and regulations, and to fraud risk.
- Apply every point to the scenario facts and finish with a recommendation.
Common mistakes
- Mixing up layering and integration. Fix: Ask where the money is in the process. Layering is still hiding the trail. Integration is when the money comes back as apparently legitimate wealth or income.
- Saying the auditor needs proof or certainty before reporting. Fix: State that knowledge or suspicion is enough. Auditors report suspicion internally and the nominated officer decides next steps.
- Listing AML steps with no link to the scenario. Fix: Tie every point to a fact in the case. Name the client, the owner or the transaction.
- Telling the client about the suspicion or the report. Fix: State that tipping off is an offence in most regimes. Take advice from the MLRO before saying anything.
- Saying the auditor reports the SAR directly to the authority. Fix: Write the chain: team member to MLRO, then MLRO to authority. Say the MLRO decides.
- Waiting for proof before reporting. Fix: State that suspicion or reasonable grounds is enough. The authorities investigate.
Exam tips
- Always apply the stage or offence to the scenario facts. Definitions alone score few marks.
- Use the exact words: placement, layering, integration, concealing, assisting, failing to report, tipping off.
- In advice questions, say who the auditor reports to (the nominated officer) and that suspicion is enough.
- Never recommend raising a report or investigation with the client. Make the tipping off risk explicit.
- Write the answer as a short recommendation to a manager or partner to earn professional skills marks.
- Always link AML points to the facts. Generic lists earn few marks.
- Use the word 'MLRO' in the right place: staff report to the MLRO, and the MLRO reports externally.
- Mention tipping off whenever a suspicion arises in a scenario.