CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam
Guidance for Standard V: Investment Analysis, Recommendations, and Actions: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Core duty (V(A)(1))
- Exercise diligence, independence and thoroughness in analyzing investments, making recommendations and taking investment actions
- All three words matter. A rushed or biased analysis breaches the Standard even if the outcome is good.
- Reasonable basis (V(A)(2))
- Have a reasonable and adequate basis, supported by appropriate research and investigation, for any recommendation or action
- Depth of research scales with the complexity and risk of the investment and the client situation.
- Third-party research test
- Rely on others' work only after making reasonable efforts to confirm it is sound
- Review assumptions, methods, data quality and the provider's independence.
- Compliance idea
- Firm policy should set minimum due diligence, require documentation, and ensure research is reviewed and updated
- Written procedures support the reasonable basis. Quantitative models and ratings need understood limits.
- Standard V(A) core duty
- Diligence + Independence + Thoroughness → Reasonable and adequate basis
- Applies to analysis, recommendations and investment actions. Use the Standard's wording in answers.
- Test for relying on others' research
- Reliance is acceptable only after reasonable efforts to confirm the research is sound
- Check assumptions, rigor, thoroughness and independence of the provider.
- Quantitative model due diligence
- Understand inputs, assumptions, limits and stress behavior
- You need not rebuild the model, but you must know its limits.
- Responsibility rule
- Using outside research does not transfer accountability
- You remain responsible for recommendations and actions.
- Standard V(A) core duty
- Diligence, independence and thoroughness + reasonable and adequate basis (supported by research and investigation)
- Applies to analysis, recommendations and investment actions, including those made by groups.
- Disagreement with a sound basis
- Reasonable basis exists → member need not dissent or remove their name
- The standard does not require agreement with every group conclusion.
- Disagreement because basis is inadequate
- No reasonable basis → dissent, and consider removing name if dissent is not reflected
- Staying associated can imply endorsement and may also raise Standard I(C).
- Process disclosure
- Disclose: basic format + general principles of the process (analysis, security selection, portfolio construction)
- Applies to clients and prospective clients. Update them promptly when a change could materially affect the process.
- Limitations and risks
- Disclose: significant limitations and risks of the investment process
- Includes limits of models and assumptions that could materially affect results.
- Relevant factors
- Use reasonable judgment to identify important factors and include them in communications
- Do not omit a key factor or overstate a minor one.
- Fact vs opinion
- Distinguish fact from opinion in analysis and recommendations
- Label forecasts, views and judgments as opinion. Facts are verifiable.
- Standard V(C) core duty
- Develop and maintain appropriate records to support investment analyses, recommendations, actions and other investment-related communications with clients and prospects
- Applies to all of these, not only written research reports.
- Retention period
- Keep records for at least 7 years (longer if local law requires)
- The Handbook recommends at least seven years; if local law requires a longer period, follow the longer one.
- Ownership rule
- Records are generally the property of the firm
- Departing employees should not take originals; copies need firm permission.
- Recordkeeping responsibility
- Firm usually holds the records; where there is no firm, the member must retain them
- Independent practitioners and those without firm systems must retain records themselves.
- Standard V(A) Diligence and Reasonable Basis (official wording)
- Members and Candidates must: 1. Exercise diligence, independence, and thoroughness in analyzing investments, making investment recommendations, and taking investment actions. 2. Have a reasonable and adequate basis, supported by appropriate research and investigation, for any investment analysis, recommendation, or action.
- Applies to the work done before recommending or acting.
- Standard V(B) Communication with Clients (summary, not exact wording)
- Summary of four duties: (1) disclose to clients and prospective clients the basic format and general principles of the investment processes used; (2) promptly disclose any change that might materially affect those processes; (3) identify and include important factors in communications; (4) distinguish between fact and opinion.
- This is a summary of the Standard's duties. Applies to what clients are told and how.
- Standard V(C) Record Retention (summary)
- Members and Candidates must develop and maintain appropriate records to support their investment analysis, recommendations, actions and other investment-related communications with clients and prospective clients.
- Absent regulatory requirements, retain records for at least seven years; records are the firm's property.
- Quick test
- Work done poorly → V(A). Client told poorly → V(B). Evidence not kept → V(C).
- A single case can breach more than one part.
Quick revision
- V(A): exercise diligence, independence and thoroughness, and have a reasonable basis supported by research or investigation.
- V(B): disclose the basic format and general principles of your investment process, and any changes that could affect it.
- V(B): tell clients and prospects about significant limitations and risks of the process and the recommendation.
- V(B): use reasonable judgment on which factors to include, and separate fact from opinion.
- V(C): maintain records that support your analysis, recommendations, actions and communications.
- Where no regulation sets a retention period, the Guidance recommends keeping records for at least seven years. Seven years is a recommendation, not a rule. Follow a longer legal period where one applies, and keep records in a form that can be retrieved. Records belong to the firm, not the member.
- Using third-party research: you must check its quality and assumptions, not just trust the name of the provider.
- Group research: a member who believes the group view has a reasonable basis may stay associated with it. A member who believes it lacks a reasonable basis should ask to have their name removed from the report.
- Firms should have written policies for research review, so a reasonable basis does not depend on one person.
- Changing jobs: do not take records or files without the former employer's permission.
- Fact versus opinion: label forecasts and views clearly as such, so the client can judge them.
- Elimination tip: reject options that rely blindly on others, hide risks, or discard records.
Common mistakes
- Thinking a profitable recommendation proves compliance Fix: V(A) judges the process. Ask what research supported the decision at the time it was made.
- Believing a recommendation that later loses money breaches the Standard Fix: A loss alone is not a violation. If the basis was reasonable and adequate, the member complied.
- Believing a reputable provider removes the duty to check. Fix: Reputation helps, but you must still make reasonable efforts to confirm soundness.
- Thinking you must recreate all third-party research yourself. Fix: The Standard asks for reasonable efforts. Review assumptions, rigor and independence, not rebuild from scratch.
- Thinking every member must agree with the group conclusion. Fix: Remember the guidance: consensus work can differ from one member's view, and agreement is not required if the basis is reasonable.
- Saying a dissenting member must always remove their name. Fix: Name removal is for cases where the member believes the basis is inadequate and their dissent is not reflected. Mere disagreement does not trigger it.
- Thinking you must reveal every detail of a proprietary model. Fix: Remember the standard asks for the basic format and general principles only, plus significant limitations.
- Applying the duty only to existing clients. Fix: The standard names clients and prospective clients. Prospects are covered.
- Treating seven years as a legal requirement everywhere. Fix: Say 'at least seven years recommended; follow longer local requirements'.
- Thinking an analyst owns the models and notes they built. Fix: Remember that records are generally firm property. Leaving analysts need permission to take copies.
Exam tips
- Look for the process words: reviewed, verified, documented, copied, relied. They signal whether the answer is compliance or violation.
- Never pick an option saying a loss proves a violation or a gain proves compliance. V(A) is judged on the basis at the time.
- With third-party research, models and ratings, the best option usually involves making reasonable efforts to check them, not rejecting them or accepting them blindly.
- Separate V(A) from III(C) Suitability and V(B) Communication. If the question is about the quality of research, it is V(A).
- Name the Standard in your head as V(A) and use the phrase reasonable and adequate basis to anchor the answer.
- Look for the phrase 'without checking' or 'relied solely'. It usually signals a V(A) violation.
- Correct answers use 'reasonable efforts', not 'verify every figure' or 'rebuild the model'.
- Expect scenarios with a conflicted broker or vendor. Independence is the hidden clue.