CMA Intermediate · Corporate Accounting and Auditing
Audit Report and Reporting under CARO: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Minimum elements of the report (SA 700, para 49)
- Title; Addressee; Opinion section (with framework); Identification of financial statements audited; Independence and Code of Ethics statement; Going concern section where applicable; Basis for Qualified/Adverse Opinion where applicable; Key audit matters or prescribed additional information where applicable; Other information section where applicable; Management's responsibilities and those charged with oversight; Auditor's responsibilities with reference to SAs and law; Signature; Place; Date
- Para 49(a)-(n). These are the minimum if law prescribes a specific layout and the report still refers to the Standards on Auditing. Remember the order a to n for a list answer.
- Choosing the opinion
- Material, not pervasive misstatement → Qualified | Material and pervasive misstatement → Adverse | Material, not pervasive inability to get evidence → Qualified | Material and pervasive inability to get evidence → Disclaimer | No material matter → Unmodified
- This is the logic of SA 705 para 2: nature of the matter and pervasiveness. Use it for every opinion-type question.
- Heading change (SA 705, para 20)
- "Basis for Opinion" → "Basis for Qualified Opinion" / "Basis for Adverse Opinion" / "Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion"
- The section must also describe the matter giving rise to the modification.
- No contradiction rule (SA 705, para 15)
- Adverse opinion or disclaimer on the financial statements as a whole → no unmodified opinion on a single statement or element under the same framework in the same report
- Such an unmodified opinion would contradict the adverse opinion or disclaimer.
- Decision grid: misstatement
- Material but not pervasive → Qualified opinion; Material and pervasive → Adverse opinion
- Used when the auditor disagrees with management on the financial statements.
- Decision grid: inability to obtain evidence
- Material but not pervasive → Qualified opinion; Material and pervasive → Disclaimer of opinion
- Used for scope limitations where possible effects could be material.
- Opinion wording
- Qualified (misstatement): 'except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph'; Qualified (scope limitation): 'except for the possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph'; Adverse: 'do not give a true and fair view'
- Disclaimer: 'we do not express an opinion'. The heading of the opinion section also changes to match.
- Report structure
- Opinion → Basis for (Qualified / Adverse) Opinion or Basis for Disclaimer of Opinion
- The basis paragraph must state the reasons and, where practicable, quantify the effect.
- Conditions for an EOM paragraph (SA 706, para 8)
- EOM allowed only if: (a) no modification of opinion is needed under SA 705 (Revised) AND (b) when SA 701 applies, the matter is not a KAM
- The matter must be presented or disclosed in the financial statements and be fundamental to users' understanding.
- EOM vs OM test
- Matter presented or disclosed in financial statements → EOM; matter not presented or disclosed → OM
- Both are used to draw attention. Neither changes the opinion.
- KAM definition (SA 701)
- KAMs = matters of most significance in the audit of the current period, selected from matters communicated with those charged with governance
- Mandatory for complete sets of general purpose financial statements of listed entities (SA 700 para 30).
- EOM is not a substitute for KAM
- When SA 701 applies: EOM ≠ replacement for describing individual KAMs
- A matter determined to be a KAM must be communicated as a KAM.
- Placement of EOM with KAM section
- EOM may sit directly before or after the Key Audit Matters section
- Choose by relative significance. Adding context to the heading, e.g. "Emphasis of Matter – Subsequent Event", helps tell it apart from KAMs.
- EOM on reporting framework
- EOM about the applicable framework may be placed immediately after the Basis of Opinion section
- This gives context to the opinion.
- General rule
- CARO 2020 applies to every company, including a foreign company, unless an exception in paragraph 1(2) applies
- Start from 'applicable' and then test exemptions.
- Fully exempt company types
- Banking company; insurance company; section 8 company; One Person Company; small company
- No further test is needed for these categories.
- Small private company exemption
- Private limited company, not a subsidiary or holding company of a public company, AND paid up capital + reserves and surplus ≤ ₹1 crore AND no borrowings from bank or financial institution > ₹1 crore at any point in the year AND total revenue ≤ ₹10 crore
- All conditions must hold together. Failing one means CARO applies. Borrowings are tested at any point during the year; capital and reserves on the balance sheet date.
- Consolidated financial statements
- CARO 2020 does not apply to the report on consolidated financial statements, except clause (xxi) of paragraph 3
- Clause (xxi) deals with qualifications or adverse remarks in CARO reports of group companies.
- Period covered
- Auditor's reports for financial years commencing on or after 1 April 2019
- The matters in paragraphs 3 and 4 are reported in addition to the section 143 report, as applicable.
- Clause 3(i)(a)
- Proper records: PPE (full particulars, quantitative details, situation); intangibles (full particulars)
- Reported separately: (A) for PPE and (B) for intangible assets.
- Clause 3(i)(b)
- PPE physically verified by management at reasonable intervals; material discrepancies properly dealt with in books
- Physical verification of PPE is by management. The auditor reports whether it was done and how discrepancies were treated.
- Clause 3(i)(c)
- Title deeds of all immovable properties held in company's name; if not, give details in prescribed format
- Excludes properties where the company is lessee and lease agreements are duly executed in its favour. Format covers description, gross carrying value, name held in, whether promoter/director/relative/employee, period held, reason (and whether in dispute).
- Clause 3(i)(d)
- Revaluation of PPE (including Right of Use assets) or intangibles: based on Registered Valuer? Specify change if 10% or more in aggregate of net carrying value of each class
- The 10% test is applied class by class, on net carrying value.
- Clause 3(i)(e)
- Benami property proceedings initiated or pending under the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988; disclosure in financial statements
- Report whether details are appropriately disclosed.
- Clause 3(ii)(a)
- Inventory verified by management at reasonable intervals; coverage and procedure appropriate in auditor's opinion; discrepancies of 10% or more in aggregate for each class of inventory properly dealt with
- The 10% test is for each class of inventory.
- Clause 3(ii)(b)
- Working capital limits sanctioned above ₹5 crore in aggregate at any point in the year, on security of current assets: do quarterly returns or statements agree with books of account?
- Applies to limits from banks or financial institutions. If they do not agree, give details.
- Clause 3(iii)
- Investments made, guarantees or security provided, loans or advances in the nature of loans granted to companies, firms, LLPs or other parties: report sub-clauses (a) to (f)
- Sub-clauses (a) and (e) are not applicable to companies whose principal business is to give loans.
- Clause 3(iii) details
- (a) amounts during year and outstanding, to subsidiaries/JVs/associates and to others; (b) not prejudicial to company's interest; (c) repayment schedule stipulated and regular; (d) overdue more than ninety days and recovery steps; (e) renewals or fresh loans to settle overdues; (f) loans repayable on demand or with no terms
- Under (f), give aggregate amount, percentage to total loans granted, and amount granted to Promoters and related parties as defined in section 2(76) of the Companies Act, 2013.
- Clause 3(iv)
- Loans, investments, guarantees and security: sections 185 and 186 complied with? If not, give details
- Short clause, but a qualification here needs the details of the breach.
- Clause 3(v)
- Deposits accepted or deemed deposits: RBI directives and sections 73 to 76 or other relevant provisions and rules complied with? If not, state nature of contraventions; if an order has been passed by Company Law Board, NCLT, RBI, a court or tribunal, has it been complied with?
- Applies where applicable.
- Clause 3(vii)(a): undisputed statutory dues
- Report arrears outstanding on the last day of the year for more than six months from the date payable
- Applies to undisputed dues including GST, provident fund, ESI, income-tax, sales-tax, service tax, customs, excise, VAT, cess and other statutory dues.
- Clause 3(vii)(b): disputed dues
- Disclose amount involved and forum where dispute is pending
- A mere representation to the department is not a dispute.
- Clause 3(ix)(a): default in repayment
- Report period and amount of default, in the prescribed format
- Format covers nature of borrowing, lender name, amount not paid, principal or interest, days of delay and remarks. Lender-wise details are needed for banks, financial institutions and Government.
- Clause 3(xi): fraud and whistle-blowers
- (a) fraud noticed or reported, with nature and amount; (b) ADT-4 filed under section 143(12); (c) whistle-blower complaints considered
- Covers fraud by the company and fraud on the company.
- Clause 3(xiv): internal audit
- System commensurate with size and nature; internal audit reports considered by statutory auditor
- Two separate sub-clauses, (a) and (b).
- Clause 3(xvii): cash losses
- Cash loss in current year and in immediately preceding year; state amount
- Report whether cash losses were incurred in the current year and in the immediately preceding year. State the amount for each year in which they were incurred.
- Source of CARO
- CARO 2020 = Order made under Section 143(11) of the Companies Act, 2013 (S.O. 849(E), 25 February 2020)
- It supersedes CARO 2016, except for things done or omitted before supersession.
- IFC reporting location
- Main report, Section 143(3) matters: IFC clause refers to separate "Annexure A"
- The SA 700 illustration places this under the Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements.
- What the IFC report covers
- IFC report = adequacy of IFC over financial reporting + operating effectiveness of such controls
- Both limbs must be addressed.
- CARO clause 3(xxi)
- Consolidated FS: report whether any qualifications or adverse remarks exist in the CARO reports of included companies; if yes, give company names and paragraph numbers
- Reported by the auditor of the consolidated financial statements.
- Where CARO appears
- CARO statement = Annexure to the audit report, on matters in the Order, to the extent applicable
- Do not mix it with the IFC Annexure A.
Quick revision
- After the title and addressee, the report begins with the Opinion section, followed by the Basis for Opinion.
- There are four opinion types: unmodified, qualified, adverse and disclaimer.
- Qualified: the matter is material but not pervasive.
- Adverse: misstatements are material and pervasive.
- Disclaimer: the auditor cannot obtain sufficient appropriate evidence and the possible effects are material and pervasive.
- Key audit matters (SA 701) are mandatory for listed entities, and are not communicated when the auditor disclaims an opinion.
- Emphasis of Matter draws attention to a matter already disclosed; it does not modify the opinion.
- Other Matter paragraph refers to a matter not presented or disclosed but relevant to users' understanding of the audit or the report.
- CARO 2020 applies to companies only if they are not specifically exempt, so always check applicability first.
- CARO clauses are reported in a separate annexure to the auditor's report.
- Internal financial controls reporting is a separate requirement and is not a CARO clause.
- If a CARO clause does not apply, state that it is not applicable instead of leaving it blank.
Common mistakes
- Treating qualified and adverse as differing only in severity words, without pervasiveness. Fix: State the test: both involve material misstatement, but adverse applies when the effect is also pervasive.
- Giving an adverse opinion when the auditor could not get evidence. Fix: Inability to get evidence that is material and pervasive leads to a disclaimer. Adverse relates to misstatement.
- Giving an adverse opinion when the auditor could not get evidence on a pervasive matter. Fix: Adverse is only for misstatement. A pervasive scope limitation gives a disclaimer of opinion.
- Calling a qualified opinion a 'partial disclaimer' or mixing the two terms. Fix: Qualified expresses an opinion 'except for' the matter. A disclaimer expresses no opinion at all.
- Using an EOM paragraph to deal with a material misstatement. Fix: SA 706 allows EOM only if the opinion need not be modified under SA 705. A misstatement needs a qualified or adverse opinion.
- Saying an EOM paragraph is a qualification of the opinion. Fix: EOM does not modify the opinion. The opinion stays unmodified; the paragraph only highlights a disclosed matter.
- Treating any private company with low revenue as exempt. Fix: Check all three limits and the holding or subsidiary link. Exemption needs every condition to be met.
- Ignoring the holding or subsidiary condition. Fix: Ask first: is it a subsidiary or holding company of a public company? If yes, no exemption.
- Saying the auditor physically verifies PPE or inventory under clause 3(i)(b) or 3(ii)(a). Fix: The clause asks whether verification was done by management. For inventory, the auditor also gives an opinion on whether coverage and procedure are appropriate.
- Applying the 10% inventory discrepancy test to total inventory. Fix: The text says discrepancies of 10% or more in the aggregate for each class of inventory. Test class by class.
Exam tips
- For "differentiate" questions, give pervasiveness as the core point, then add nature of the matter and wording of the opinion.
- In MCQs, check the cause first. If the stem says "unable to obtain evidence" and the effect is pervasive, the answer is disclaimer, not adverse.
- For contents questions, follow the para 49 order and mention that these are minimum elements where law prescribes a layout.
- Write a one-line reason for the opinion type in scenario answers, because step marks go to the reasoning.
- Link the opinion to the Basis section heading change to show you know SA 705.
- Draw the 2×2 grid at the start of your answer. It earns step marks and keeps you from mixing opinions.
- In MCQs, check whether the facts describe a disagreement or a lack of evidence before looking at the options.
- Quote the figures from the question when judging materiality and pervasiveness, and do it in a line or two.