CS Professional · Arbitration, Mediation and Conciliation
Conceptual Framework of International Commercial Arbitration: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Definition test
- International commercial arbitration = commercial legal relationship (under Indian law) + at least one party from the four foreign categories
- Both conditions must be met. Section 2(1)(f).
- Four foreign categories
- (i) foreign national or habitual resident individual; (ii) body corporate incorporated abroad; (iii) association or body of individuals with central management and control abroad; (iv) Government of a foreign country
- Only one party needs to fit. The word "company" was omitted from clause (iii).
- Meaning of Court
- ICA: High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction, or High Court hearing appeals from subordinate courts' decrees. Other arbitration: principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction in a district (includes High Court with ordinary original jurisdiction)
- Section 2(1)(e). The forum differs for international commercial arbitration.
- Substance of dispute in ICA seated in India
- Rules of law designated by parties; if none, rules the tribunal considers appropriate
- Section 28(1)(b). In other arbitrations, substantive Indian law applies (Section 28(1)(a)).
- Nature of award made in India
- Award under Part I = domestic award
- Section 2(7). Applies even where the arbitration is international and the place is India.
- Part I applicability
- Part I applies where the place of arbitration is in India. Sections 9, 27 and 37(1)(a) and 37(3) also apply to an ICA seated outside India, unless the parties agree otherwise
- Section 2(2) and its proviso.
- Ad hoc arbitration
- Parties design and run the process; no institution administers it
- Parties fix appointment, procedure, place, language and fees themselves.
- Institutional arbitration
- Institution + its rules + administration of the case
- Rules referred to in the agreement form part of the agreement (Section 2(8)).
- Parties may authorise an institution
- Section 2(6): freedom to determine an issue includes the right to authorise any person, including an institution
- Does not apply to Section 28, which deals with the rules applicable to the substance of the dispute.
- Fallback appointment in ad hoc cases
- Section 11(4), (5), (6): appointment by the Supreme Court or High Court, or its designate
- Under Section 11(12)(a), in an international commercial arbitration the reference is to the Supreme Court.
- Timing under Section 11
- 30 days to appoint or agree; court to endeavour to dispose of the application within 60 days of service of notice
- Section 11(4), (5) and (13).
- Court's scope at appointment
- Section 11(6A): confine to examining the existence of an arbitration agreement
- Applies to applications under Section 11(4), (5) or (6).
- Arbitration agreement (Section 7)
- Agreement to submit defined disputes (present or future) + defined legal relationship + in writing
- It may be a clause or a separate agreement. Section 7(3) requires writing.
- Writing under Section 7(4)
- Signed document OR exchange of communications (including electronic) recording the agreement OR claim-and-defence exchange without denial
- Section 7(5): reference to a document with an arbitration clause counts if the contract is in writing and the reference makes the clause part of it.
- International commercial arbitration (Section 2(1)(f))
- Commercial relationship + at least one party foreign (individual national or habitual resident; foreign body corporate; association with foreign central management and control; foreign government)
- A company is covered through the body corporate limb. Central management and control applies to associations or bodies of individuals.
- Seat vs venue
- Seat = legal home deciding supervisory courts and procedural law; Venue = physical place of hearings
- A venue does not by itself become the seat. The agreement read as a whole decides.
- Territorial rule (Section 2(2))
- Part I applies where place of arbitration is in India
- Proviso: Sections 9, 27 and 37(1)(a), 37(3) also apply to ICA seated abroad unless the parties agree otherwise.
- Substance of dispute in ICA seated in India (Section 28(1)(b))
- Parties' designated rules of law; else rules the tribunal considers appropriate
- Designation of a country's law means its substantive law, not its conflict rules, unless otherwise expressed.
- Court in ICA (Section 2(1)(e)(ii))
- High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction, or otherwise a High Court hearing appeals from subordinate courts
- The Court must have jurisdiction as if the subject-matter were a suit.
- Domestic arbitration seated in India
- Place in India + not international commercial → Indian substantive law in force
- Section 28(1)(a). The tribunal decides in accordance with the substantive law for the time being in force in India.
- International commercial arbitration, law designated
- Place in India + ICA + parties designate → tribunal applies the designated rules of law
- Section 28(1)(b)(i). Parties may designate rules of law, not only a national law.
- Designation of a country's law
- Designated country's law = its substantive law, not its conflict of laws rules
- Section 28(1)(b)(ii). Applies unless the parties have expressed otherwise.
- No designation
- No designation → rules of law the tribunal considers appropriate given all circumstances
- Section 28(1)(b)(iii). The tribunal chooses; it need not apply a conflict rule.
- Equity decisions
- Ex aequo et bono / amiable compositeur only if parties expressly authorise
- Section 28(2). Silence or implied consent is not enough.
- Contract and usages
- In all cases: take into account contract terms + trade usages
- Section 28(3), as substituted by Act 3 of 2016 (from 23-10-2015). It applies to domestic and international cases.
- Four layers of governing law
- Law of contract + law of arbitration agreement + lex arbitri (seat) + law of substance
- Each can differ. Name the layer before you answer.
- Domestic-seat, non-international case: Section 28(1)(a)
- Place in India, not international commercial arbitration → substantive law in force in India
- Parties cannot pick a foreign law for this category under this clause.
- International commercial arbitration, party choice: Section 28(1)(b)(i)
- Tribunal decides per rules of law designated by the parties
- Applies where the place of arbitration is in India. 'Rules of law' is wider than the law of one country.
- Designation of a country's law: Section 28(1)(b)(ii)
- Designated law = substantive law of that country, not its conflict of laws rules
- Unless the parties express otherwise. This excludes renvoi.
- No designation: Section 28(1)(b)(iii)
- Tribunal applies rules of law it considers appropriate given all circumstances
- The tribunal chooses; a particular conflict rule is not prescribed.
- Equity decisions: Section 28(2)
- Ex aequo et bono / amiable compositeur only if parties expressly authorise
- Silence means strict law.
- Contract terms and usages: Section 28(3)
- In all cases, take into account contract terms and applicable trade usages
- Applies to every award.
- Validity of arbitration agreement
- Law chosen by parties; failing indication, Indian law (s. 34) or law of country where award was made (s. 48)
- Used in set-aside and foreign award enforcement tests.
- Default three-member tribunal
- Each party appoints 1 arbitrator; the two appointed arbitrators appoint the third (presiding)
- Applies only if the parties have not agreed a procedure (Section 11(3)).
- Thirty-day triggers
- Party fails to appoint within 30 days of request, or two arbitrators fail to agree on the third within 30 days of their appointment → court appointment on request
- Section 11(4). For a sole arbitrator, 30 days from receipt of a request to agree (Section 11(5)).
- Who appoints in international commercial arbitration
- Supreme Court (or person or institution designated by it)
- Section 11(12)(a). In other arbitrations, the High Court (Section 11(12)(b)).
- Scope of court's examination
- Confined to the existence of an arbitration agreement
- Section 11(6A).
- Disposal of application
- Endeavour to dispose of within 60 days from service of notice on opposite party
- Section 11(13).
- Award time limit
- 12 months from completion of pleadings under Section 23(4); extendable by consent by up to 6 months
- Section 29A(1) and (3). For international commercial arbitration, the proviso makes this an endeavour.
- Additional fees for early award
- Award within 6 months of tribunal entering upon reference → additional fees as parties agree
- Section 29A(2).
- Fee reduction on court-extended delay
- Reduction not exceeding 5% per month of delay attributable to the tribunal
- Section 29A(4) proviso; arbitrator must be heard first.
Quick revision
- International commercial arbitration needs a commercial relationship and at least one foreign-linked party under Section 2(1)(f).
- A body corporate counts if it is incorporated outside India; an association counts if its central management and control is exercised outside India.
- Arbitral tribunal means a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.
- Part I applies where the place of arbitration is in India, subject to the proviso for Sections 9, 27 and 37(1)(a) and 37(3).
- Section 28(1)(a): in a domestic arbitration seated in India, the tribunal applies the substantive law in force in India.
- Section 28(1)(b): in international commercial arbitration, the tribunal applies the rules of law designated by the parties.
- A designated country's law means its substantive law, not its conflict of laws rules, unless otherwise expressed.
- With no designation, the tribunal applies the rules of law it considers appropriate.
- The tribunal decides ex aequo et bono or as amiable compositeur only if the parties expressly authorise it.
- In every case the tribunal must take into account the contract terms and applicable trade usages (Section 28(3)).
- Section 11: the default for three arbitrators is one by each party and a presiding arbitrator chosen by the two; the 30-day periods trigger a court request.
- In international commercial arbitration, the Supreme Court acts under Section 11; in other arbitrations, the relevant High Court acts.
Common mistakes
- Treating an arbitration as international because it is held abroad or the contract has foreign law. Fix: The test in Section 2(1)(f) is about the parties and the commercial nature of the relationship, not the seat or governing law.
- Treating an Indian company controlled by foreigners as a party under clause (iii). Fix: An Indian-incorporated company is not incorporated abroad, so clause (ii) fails, and clause (iii) does not name companies. Apply the text as written.
- Saying ad hoc arbitration has no rules at all. Fix: Say parties set their own rules or adopt rules like UNCITRAL, but no institution administers the case.
- Treating institutional arbitration as always faster and cheaper. Fix: Say it usually adds certainty and support, but adds administrative fees and gives less flexibility.
- Treating venue and seat as the same thing. Fix: Ask where the legal home of the arbitration is. Hearings in a city do not by themselves make it the seat. Read the whole agreement.
- Saying Part I never applies to foreign-seated arbitrations. Fix: State the rule and the exception: Sections 9, 27 and 37(1)(a), 37(3) can still apply to an international commercial arbitration seated abroad, unless the parties agreed otherwise.
- Saying parties can choose a foreign law in every arbitration seated in India. Fix: Party choice of law is in section 28(1)(b), which covers only international commercial arbitration. A domestic arbitration follows Indian substantive law.
- Applying the conflict of laws rules of the designated country. Fix: Under section 28(1)(b)(ii), the designation is a reference to substantive law, unless the parties expressed otherwise.
- Treating the law of the contract as automatically the law of the arbitration agreement. Fix: Treat the arbitration agreement as a separate layer. Look for a separate choice or the implied law before concluding.
- Confusing seat law (lex arbitri) with the law of the substance. Fix: Lex arbitri governs procedure and court supervision. Substantive law decides the merits. Label each one separately.
Exam tips
- Quote Section 2(1)(f) with the four clauses by number. Examiners reward exact structure.
- Write the commercial test and foreign element test as two separate lines in every answer.
- Do not state that the word company appears in clause (iii). Mention that it was omitted in 2015.
- Close case answers with a consequence: Court meaning, Section 28(1)(b), or Section 2(7), to show analysis beyond the definition.
- Where the seat is abroad, mention the Section 2(2) proviso on Sections 9, 27 and 37(1)(a) and (3).
- Answer in comparison form: define, contrast on set heads, apply the Act, then conclude.
- Quote Section 2(8), Section 2(6) and Section 11 only as far as you are sure; link them to the facts.
- For clause-based questions, first classify the clause as ad hoc or institutional, then decide what happens on a failure.