FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II
High-level Summary of Basel III Reforms: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Risk-based capital ratio
- Capital ratio = Regulatory capital ÷ Risk-weighted assets
- The finalisation reforms change the denominator, not the definition of capital.
- Leverage ratio
- Leverage ratio = Tier 1 capital ÷ Total exposure measure
- Non-risk-based backstop, which does not use RWAs.
- Output floor
- Total RWA = max(RWA from internal models, floor % × RWA from standardised approaches)
- The floor is 72.5% under the finalised Basel III framework. It applies to total RWAs, not each risk type separately.
- Risk-weighted assets
- RWA = Exposure (after CCF and credit risk mitigation) × Risk weight
- Minimum capital = capital ratio × RWA. For example, 8% of RWA is the total capital minimum before buffers.
- Loan-to-value ratio
- LTV = Loan amount ÷ Property value
- Property value must be prudently assessed and not raised except for modifications that improve the property. Higher LTV gives a higher risk weight.
- Whole-loan residential weights (not materially dependent on property cash flows)
- LTV ≤ 50%: 20%; 50–60%: 25%; 60–80%: 30%; 80–90%: 40%; 90–100%: 50%; > 100%: 70%
- Whole-loan approach applies the weight to the entire loan. Weights are for general residential exposures. Check your reading for the variants.
- Other key corporate and retail weights
- Unrated corporate: 100%; unrated corporate SME: 85%; regulatory retail: 75%; ADC: 150%
- Rated corporates use rating-based weights, such as 20% for AAA to AA-, 50% for A, 75% for BBB, 100% for BB, and 150% below BB-.
- Due diligence rule
- Risk weight after due diligence ≥ risk weight from external rating
- Due diligence can only raise the weight, never lower it.
- Output floor (aggregate)
- Floored RWA = max[ RWA(internal models) ; 72.5% × RWA(standardised approaches) ]
- Applied to total RWA across credit, market and operational risk, not exposure by exposure.
- Maximum capital benefit from models
- Maximum reduction = 1 − 72.5% = 27.5% of standardised RWA
- Models can never cut total RWA below 72.5% of the standardised total.
- Impact of the floor
- Add-on RWA = max[ 0 ; 72.5% × Standardised RWA − Internal-model RWA ]
- The floor binds only when the add-on is positive.
- Capital ratio after floor
- CET1 ratio = CET1 capital ÷ Floored RWA
- Use floored RWA as the denominator when the floor binds.
- Input floor reminder
- PD floor = 0.05% for corporate and bank exposures
- Input floors are minimums on PD, LGD and EAD inputs. Floored inputs raise RWA from the model.
- Business Indicator (BI)
- BI = ILDC + SC + FC (each a three-year average)
- BI is measured in euros in the Basel text. It is an average of the last three years, not a single year.
- Interest, leases and dividend component
- ILDC = min[ |Interest income − Interest expense| , 2.25% × Interest-earning assets ] + Dividend income
- The 2.25% cap limits the net interest part. Dividend income is added after the cap.
- Services component
- SC = max(Other operating income, Other operating expense) + max(Fee income, Fee expense)
- Take the larger of each pair. Income and expense do not net off.
- Financial component
- FC = |Net P&L trading book| + |Net P&L banking book|
- Use absolute values. A trading loss still adds to BI.
- BIC, bucket 1
- BI ≤ €1bn: BIC = 12% × BI
- ILM is set to 1 for banks in this bucket.
- BIC, bucket 2
- €1bn < BI ≤ €30bn: BIC = €120m + 15% × (BI − €1bn)
- The €120m is 12% of the first €1bn. Marginal rates apply only to the slice above each threshold.
- BIC, bucket 3
- BI > €30bn: BIC = €4,470m + 18% × (BI − €30bn)
- €4,470m = €120m + 15% × €29bn.
- Loss Component
- LC = 15 × average annual operational losses over the previous 10 years
- Losses are those above the data thresholds the bank applies.
- Internal Loss Multiplier
- ILM = ln[ e − 1 + (LC ÷ BIC)^0.8 ]
- e ≈ 2.71828, so e − 1 ≈ 1.71828. If LC = BIC, ILM = 1.
- Operational risk capital and RWA
- Capital = BIC × ILM; RWA = 12.5 × Capital
- The 12.5 is the reciprocal of the 8% minimum capital ratio.
- CVA (concept)
- CVA ≈ LGD × Σ EE(tᵢ) × PD(tᵢ₋₁, tᵢ) × discount factor
- Unilateral CVA is the discounted expected loss from counterparty default. Higher exposure, spread or LGD raises it.
- BA-CVA reduced version
- K_reduced = √[(ρ × Σ SCVA_c)² + (1 − ρ²) × Σ SCVA_c²], with ρ = 50%; SCVA_c = (1/α) × RW_c × Σ_NS (M_NS × EAD_NS × DF_NS), with α = 1.4
- SCVA_c is the stand-alone CVA of counterparty c. The counterparty risk weight RW_c sits outside the sum. The sum runs over the netting sets NS of that counterparty, using the effective maturity M_NS, the exposure EAD_NS and the supervisory discount factor DF_NS for each. The 1/α scaling (α = 1.4) is already inside SCVA_c. Do not confuse DF with the 0.65 scalar, which is applied later. ρ = 50% is the supervisory correlation of systematic parts.
- BA-CVA with hedges
- K_full = β × K_reduced + (1 − β) × K_hedged, with β = 0.25
- Hedging recognition is limited. Eligible hedges are single-name CDS, single-name contingent CDS and index CDS used to hedge counterparty credit spread risk. K_hedged also includes an indirect hedge component and a hedge-misalignment component.
- BA-CVA capital charge in the capital stack
- Capital requirement = DS_BA-CVA × K, with DS_BA-CVA = 0.65
- The discount scalar of 0.65 applies to the BA-CVA charge. It is separate from the supervisory discount factor DF inside SCVA.
- SA-CVA structure
- Charge = Delta + Vega risk across risk classes (IR, FX, counterparty credit spread, reference credit spread, equity, commodity), scaled by the CVA multiplier m_CVA = 1 by default
- No default risk charge or curvature charge in SA-CVA. The charge is scaled by the CVA multiplier m_CVA, which is 1 by default; supervisors may require a higher value. It is aggregated like the FRTB sensitivities-based method.
- Simplified option
- CVA capital = 100% × counterparty credit risk capital
- A bank may choose this option if its aggregate notional of non-centrally cleared derivatives is ≤ €100 billion. The supervisor keeps discretion to require a CVA calculation instead.
- Basel III leverage ratio
- Leverage ratio = Tier 1 capital ÷ Total exposure measure
- No risk weights. Minimum is 3%.
- G-SIB leverage ratio buffer
- Leverage buffer = 50% × G-SIB higher-loss-absorbency (HLA) risk-based buffer
- Met with Tier 1 capital. Applies only to G-SIBs.
- G-SIB minimum leverage requirement
- Requirement = 3% + 50% × HLA buffer
- Example: HLA of 2.5% gives 3% + 1.25% = 4.25%.
- Exposure measure components
- Exposure = On-balance-sheet + Derivatives + SFT + Off-balance-sheet (after CCFs)
- Off-balance-sheet items use CCFs, with a 10% floor for unconditionally cancellable commitments.
- Risk-based ratio (for contrast)
- Capital ratio = Capital ÷ Risk-weighted assets
- Sensitive to risk weights. The leverage ratio is not.
- Output floor test
- RWA = max(RWA under internal models; floor % × RWA under standardised approaches)
- Applied to total RWA, not to each risk type separately.
- Output floor phase-in schedule
- 2023: 50% | 2024: 55% | 2025: 60% | 2026: 65% | 2027: 70% | 2028: 72.5%
- Rises by 5 percentage points a year, then a final 2.5 points in 2028.
- Key dates (revised timetable)
- Finalised standards: 1 January 2023 | Output floor fully phased in: 1 January 2028
- Both were deferred one year in March 2020 (from 2022 and 2027).
- Transitional cap on floor impact
- Increase in RWA from the floor ≤ 25% × RWA before the floor
- Optional supervisory cap during the phase-in years (2023-2027). It falls away when the floor reaches 72.5% on 1 January 2028.
Quick revision
- The 2017 reforms aim to cut RWA variability and restore credibility in internal models.
- Output floor: total RWA must be at least 72.5% of RWA computed using the standardised approaches.
- The 2017 package began the output floor phase-in at 50% in 2022 and reached 72.5% in 2027. In 2020 the Committee deferred implementation by one year to 1 January 2023, with the 72.5% floor fully applying from 1 January 2028.
- The revised standardised approach for credit risk is more risk-sensitive and reduces mechanical reliance on external ratings.
- Real estate exposures in the standardised approach are risk-weighted by loan-to-value ratio.
- IRB: advanced IRB is no longer allowed for large corporates (consolidated revenues above €500 million) and for banks and other financial institutions, and the equity IRB approach is removed.
- IRB input floors limit how low model estimates can go. For example, the PD floor is 0.05% for corporate and bank exposures, with different floors for other exposure classes.
- The final framework is formally the revised operational risk standardised approach, commonly called the SMA. It replaces the basic indicator, standardised and advanced measurement approaches for operational risk.
- SMA capital = Business Indicator Component × Internal Loss Multiplier; marginal coefficients are 12%, 15% and 18% by BI band. For banks in the lowest bucket (BI up to €1 billion), the ILM is set to 1, so capital equals the BIC.
- Business Indicator bands: up to €1 billion, €1 billion to €30 billion, and above €30 billion.
- The revised CVA framework removes the internal model approach and uses SA-CVA or BA-CVA.
- The leverage ratio (Tier 1 capital ÷ exposure measure) must be at least 3%; the G-SIB leverage buffer is 50% of the G-SIB risk-weighted buffer.
Common mistakes
- Saying the finalisation reforms raised the definition or quality of capital. Fix: Remember the split: first package built capital, buffers, leverage and liquidity; the finalisation fixes RWA measurement.
- Claiming internal models are eliminated. Fix: Internal models remain for many exposures but face restrictions, input floors and the output floor.
- Assuming due diligence can lower a risk weight below the rating-based weight. Fix: Remember it is a one-way override. It can only increase the weight.
- Saying the revised approach removes external ratings entirely. Fix: Ratings remain in use where permitted. The change is that ratings are not used mechanically and non-rated alternatives exist.
- Applying the 72.5% floor to each exposure separately. Fix: The output floor applies to total RWA in aggregate. Compare two totals.
- Calculating the floor as 27.5% of standardised RWA instead of 72.5%. Fix: The floor level is 72.5%. The 27.5% is only the maximum benefit.
- Applying a single rate to the whole BI, for example 15% × BI for a €5bn bank. Fix: Apply 12% to the first €1bn, 15% to the next slice up to €30bn, and 18% above that. Use the €120m and €4,470m anchors.
- Netting income and expense in the services component, or using the net figure instead of the larger one. Fix: Take max(other operating income, other operating expense) plus max(fee income, fee expense). No netting.
- Saying CVA capital covers losses from counterparty default. Fix: Remember default losses sit in the counterparty credit risk charge. CVA capital covers mark-to-market losses from spread and exposure changes.
- Thinking the internal model approach is still available to banks with approval. Fix: The revised framework removed it. Choose between BA-CVA and SA-CVA.
Exam tips
- Know the two stated goals: credibility of RWAs and comparability of ratios.
- Be able to list the key elements: revised standardised credit approach, revised IRB, new operational risk approach, revised CVA, output floor and leverage ratio changes.
- Expect output floor calculations; always compare against the standardised total.
- Watch for absolute words like 'eliminates' or 'replaces'; they usually signal a wrong option.
- Memorise the anchor weights: unrated corporate 100%, SME 85%, retail 75%, ADC 150%.
- When the stem mentions due diligence, the answer is a weight at least as high as the rating-based one.
- In real estate questions, compute LTV first and check whether repayment depends on property cash flows.
- Link SA-CR to the output floor: internal model RWA is floored against standardised RWA, so SA-CR matters beyond standardised banks.