FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II
Liquidity Risk Management: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Bid-ask spread (relative)
- Relative spread = (Ask − Bid) ÷ Mid price, where Mid = (Ask + Bid) ÷ 2
- A wider relative spread means lower market liquidity. The cost of selling one unit is about half the spread.
- Leverage
- Leverage = Assets ÷ Equity
- A loss spiral raises leverage when equity falls faster than assets are cut.
- Margin or haircut and funding capacity
- Assets financeable = Equity ÷ Margin rate (haircut as a fraction of asset value)
- If the margin rises, the same equity supports fewer assets. This drives the margin spiral.
- Core linkage rule
- Funding stress → forced sales → lower prices and market liquidity → higher margins and weaker collateral → more funding stress
- Know the direction of each link. Questions often ask which step comes next.
- Relative bid-ask spread
- S = (Ask − Bid) ÷ Mid, where Mid = (Ask + Bid) ÷ 2
- Expressed as a fraction or percentage of the mid-price.
- Liquidation cost, constant spread
- Cost = 0.5 × S × P
- P is the position value at mid. Half the spread is paid on exit.
- LVaR, constant spread
- LVaR = VaR + 0.5 × S × P
- Add the cost to VaR. Use the same currency and the same horizon for VaR.
- LVaR, exogenous spread
- LVaR = VaR + 0.5 × (μ + k × σ) × P
- μ is the mean relative spread, σ its standard deviation, and k the multiplier for the confidence level (for example about 2.33 at 99% if the spread is assumed normal, or a value the question gives you).
- Normal VaR for a position
- VaR = z × σ_return × P
- z is 1.645 at 95% and 2.326 at 99% (one-tailed). Scale σ by √t for a t-day horizon.
- Linear temporary impact cost (equal slices)
- Cost per share = η × (shares per period ÷ period length)
- η is the temporary impact coefficient. Trading faster raises the cost per share in proportion to the trading rate.
- Permanent impact cost (linear)
- Permanent cost ≈ ½ × γ × X²
- X is total shares sold, γ is the permanent impact per share. It does not depend on the speed of selling. Applies in the linear Almgren-Chriss setup.
- Temporary cost of an even sale over T
- Temporary cost = η × X² ÷ T
- Even sale of X shares over time T. A longer T cuts this cost.
- Price risk of the unsold position
- Risk over horizon = σ × √T × (average unsold shares)
- For an even schedule the average unsold is about X ÷ 2. The variance of cost is σ² × X² × T ÷ 3 in the continuous version.
- Objective function
- Minimise E[cost] + λ × Var[cost]
- λ is risk aversion. Higher λ gives a faster liquidation.
- Time-horizon scaling of volatility
- σ(T days) = σ(1 day) × √T
- Assumes independent returns and constant volatility.
- Liquidity-adjusted VaR (exogenous spread)
- LVaR = VaR + ½ × spread × position value
- Adds half the proportional spread as a liquidation cost. Endogenous impact is added on top if the position is large.
- Net funding gap (per bucket)
- Gap = Cash inflows − Cash outflows
- Negative means a shortfall in that bucket.
- Cumulative gap
- Cumulative gap(t) = Σ Gap(i) for buckets i = 1 to t
- Compare with the buffer at each horizon, not just the last one.
- Stressed buffer
- Buffer = Σ [Market value of asset × (1 − haircut)]
- Include only unencumbered, readily saleable assets.
- Survival horizon
- Longest horizon t where Buffer + Cumulative gap(t) ≥ 0
- Cumulative gap is negative when outflows exceed inflows. Use stressed flows.
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio
- LCR = Stock of HQLA ÷ Total net cash outflows over 30 days ≥ 100%
- Net outflows = outflows − min(inflows, 75% of outflows).
- Loan-to-deposit ratio
- Loans ÷ Deposits
- A higher ratio means more reliance on wholesale funding.
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio
- LCR = Stock of HQLA ÷ Total net cash outflows over next 30 days ≥ 100%
- HQLA must be unencumbered and is measured after haircuts and caps.
- Net cash outflows
- Net outflows = Total outflows − min(Total inflows, 75% × Total outflows)
- Inflows are capped at 75% of outflows, so net outflows are at least 25% of gross outflows.
- Net Stable Funding Ratio
- NSFR = Available stable funding ÷ Required stable funding ≥ 100%
- Horizon is one year. ASF and RSF are each the sum of balances × factors.
- HQLA composition
- HQLA = Level 1 + Level 2A × (1 − 15%) + Level 2B × (1 − haircut)
- Level 2B haircuts are 25% to 50% depending on the asset. Level 2 ≤ 40% of HQLA; Level 2B ≤ 15%.
- Level 2 cap
- Max Level 2 = (2 ÷ 3) × Level 1
- Equivalent to Level 2 being 40% of total HQLA. Ignores adjustments for unwinding secured transactions.
- Funding gap
- Funding gap = Cash outflows − Cash inflows over a horizon
- A positive gap must be covered by the liquidity buffer or contingent sources.
- Survival horizon
- Survival horizon = time until cumulative net outflows exceed the liquidity buffer
- Longer is safer. Compare it to the stress period required by policy.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio
- Loan-to-deposit ratio = Loans ÷ Deposits
- A high ratio suggests reliance on wholesale funding.
- Repo cash raised
- Cash = Collateral market value × (1 − haircut)
- A higher haircut means less cash from the same collateral.
- Leverage
- Leverage = Total assets ÷ Equity
- Higher leverage means smaller price falls can force asset sales and margin calls.
Quick revision
- Funding liquidity is the ability to meet obligations; market liquidity is the ability to trade without moving price.
- The two types reinforce each other: funding stress forces asset sales, and falling prices tighten funding.
- Liquidation cost for a position is roughly its value × half the relative spread.
- LVaR = VaR + liquidity cost, so it is always at least as large as VaR.
- Endogenous liquidity comes from your own trades; exogenous liquidity is market-wide.
- Selling fast raises price impact; selling slowly adds price risk during the delay.
- Stress tests should combine market shocks with funding outflows and haircut increases.
- LCR = stock of HQLA ÷ total net cash outflows over 30 days, with a minimum of 100%.
- NSFR = available stable funding ÷ required stable funding, with a minimum of 100%, over a one-year horizon.
- LCR is a short-term stress buffer; NSFR limits structural maturity mismatch.
- Short-term wholesale funding and rollover reliance are classic crisis weak points.
- A contingency funding plan sets triggers, funding sources and responsibilities before stress occurs.
Common mistakes
- Treating market liquidity and funding liquidity as the same thing. Fix: Market liquidity concerns trading an asset. Funding liquidity concerns meeting cash and collateral needs. Ask which side the stem describes.
- Saying a wide bid-ask spread is funding liquidity risk. Fix: Spreads measure market liquidity. A funding problem appears as failed rollover, margin calls or a cash shortfall.
- Using the full spread instead of half the spread as the cost. Fix: Always multiply by 0.5 when the position is valued at mid and you liquidate once.
- Mixing percentage and decimal spreads, for example using 0.4 instead of 0.004. Fix: Convert 0.4% to 0.004 before multiplying.
- Treating liquidity cost as only the bid-ask spread. Fix: For large positions, add price impact from your own trading. That is the endogenous part.
- Saying a longer horizon always lowers total cost. Fix: Always compare both costs. Total cost has a minimum at an intermediate horizon.
- Using the unhaircut market value of assets in the buffer. Fix: Multiply each asset by (1 − haircut) before adding. Stress raises haircuts.
- Treating contractual flows as the stressed case. Fix: Always apply behavioural run-off and draw-down assumptions given in the question.
- Mixing up the horizons, using 1 year for LCR or 30 days for NSFR. Fix: Remember LCR = 30 days, liquidity under stress; NSFR = 1 year, funding structure.
- Counting Level 2 assets at full value or ignoring the 40% cap. Fix: Haircut first, then test Level 2 ≤ 40% of HQLA and Level 2B ≤ 15%.
Exam tips
- Start every question by labelling the risk as market or funding. Many wrong options swap the two.
- Know both Brunnermeier-Pedersen spirals and the trigger of each: losses versus higher margins.
- Expect link questions: which condition makes spirals stronger? Think crowded positions, high leverage and short-term funding.
- For margin arithmetic, compute assets before and after, then take the difference. Do not rush the division.
- Read whether the spread is a single number or has a mean and standard deviation. That tells you which approach to use.
- Check the answer options. If two options differ by exactly the cost, you probably need to decide between half and full spread.
- Know the conceptual split. Constant and exogenous approaches treat spread as independent of your trade size. Endogenous models allow your own liquidation to move prices.
- Expect a conceptual question on the limits: LVaR with spread cost ignores large-trade price impact and the time needed to liquidate.