FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II
Margin (Collateral) and Settlement: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Credit support amount (one-way view)
- Call = max(0, Exposure − Threshold − Collateral already held)
- Exposure is the receiver's mark-to-market. Include any independent amount if the CSA requires it.
- Minimum transfer amount test
- Transfer only if |Call| ≥ MTA
- If the call is below the MTA, nothing moves. Some CSAs round the transfer to a set unit.
- Haircut collateral value
- Collateral value = Market value × (1 − haircut)
- Needed to find how much market value must be posted: Market value required = Value needed ÷ (1 − haircut).
- Uncollateralised exposure left
- Residual ≈ Threshold + MTA gap + price change over margin period of risk
- A rule of thumb for what stays unsecured, not an exact formula.
- Variation margin call
- Call = max(0, V − Collateral held − Threshold), subject to the MTA and rounding
- V is the net portfolio value to the caller. The call is made only if it exceeds the MTA.
- Collateralized exposure at default
- Exposure ≈ max(V(t + MPOR) − C, 0)
- C is collateral held at the start of the MPOR. Collateral is not updated during the MPOR.
- Volatility over the MPOR
- σ(MPOR) = σ(daily) × √(MPOR in days)
- Assumes independent, identically distributed daily changes. Use business days consistently.
- Approximate residual exposure (normal model)
- Residual exposure at confidence c ≈ z(c) × σ(daily) × √MPOR + Threshold
- Applies when the portfolio is fully covered up to the threshold. Add MTA effects if relevant.
- Components of MPOR
- MPOR ≈ remargining period + call, dispute and settlement time + close-out and replacement time
- Use this to explain changes in MPOR. The Basel floor is 10 business days for daily-margined OTC netting sets.
- Scaling between MPORs
- Exposure(new) ≈ Exposure(old) × √(MPOR new ÷ MPOR old)
- Fast comparison when only the MPOR changes.
- Uncleared margin IM calibration
- IM ≈ 99% one-tailed VaR over a 10-day horizon, stress-calibrated
- BCBS-IOSCO standard for non-centrally cleared derivatives; netting is allowed only within a legally enforceable netting set.
- Scaling VaR to a margin period
- VaR(T days) = VaR(1 day) × √T
- Valid under i.i.d. returns and normality; a rough approximation only. Example: √10 ≈ 3.162.
- Parametric IM for a position
- IM = z × σ(daily) × √T × Position value
- z = 2.326 for 99% one-tailed under normality.
- SIMM aggregation within a bucket
- K = √( Σ WSᵢ² + ΣΣ(i≠j) ρᵢⱼ × WSᵢ × WSⱼ )
- WS = risk weight × sensitivity; ρ = prescribed correlation. Results then aggregate across buckets and risk classes.
- Net IM exposure to the poster
- Loss to poster on collector default = IM posted − recovery of segregated IM
- If segregated and bankruptcy-remote, recovery should be full; if not segregated or rehypothecated, the poster may be an unsecured creditor.
- Collateral value after haircut
- Adjusted value = Market value × (1 − H)
- H is the haircut as a decimal. Use it for each asset separately.
- Net exposure after collateral
- Net exposure = max(0, Exposure − Σ adjusted collateral)
- Exposure cannot be negative for the receiver. Ignores threshold and minimum transfer amount unless given.
- Gross-up for a required haircut
- Market value needed = Required value ÷ (1 − H)
- Use when asked how much collateral to post to cover a given amount.
- Combined haircut (price and FX)
- Adjusted value = Market value × (1 − H_price) × (1 − H_FX)
- Basel treats these as separate adjustments. Some questions simply add them, so follow the stated method.
- Haircut from volatility
- H ≈ z × σ × √T
- σ is the volatility per unit time, T is the margin period of risk in the same unit, z is the normal quantile (for example 2.33 at 99%). It is an approximation that assumes normal returns.
- Novation
- Trade A–B → A–CCP and CCP–B
- The CCP becomes buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer. Original counterparties no longer face each other.
- Variation margin
- VM payment = change in mark-to-market value of the position
- Paid at least daily. It resets current exposure and covers losses already incurred, not future ones.
- Initial margin
- IM ≈ loss at a high confidence level (VaR or ES) over the margin period of risk
- Covers potential future exposure between the last margin call and close-out. Longer close-out periods and higher volatility raise IM.
- Default waterfall order (typical)
- Defaulter's IM → defaulter's default fund → CCP capital → non-defaulters' default fund → further recovery tools
- Defaulter pays first. Always check the order given in the question, as CCP rules vary.
- Cover-N standard
- Default fund sized to cover default of the largest member (Cover 1) or two largest (Cover 2) under extreme but plausible conditions
- Cover 2 applies to CCPs that are systemically important or have complex risk profiles under international standards.
- Netting benefit
- Net exposure = Σ(MtM across netting set), floored at zero
- Positive and negative values within a netting set offset. Multilateral netting at a CCP extends this across all members.
- Settlement risk exposure
- Exposure = full principal of the leg you have paid and not yet received
- The loss can be the whole amount, not just replacement cost.
- Pre-settlement risk exposure
- Exposure = max(MTM replacement cost, 0)
- Applies from trade date to settlement date. Much smaller than principal.
- Settlement risk window
- Window = time between irrevocable payment of your leg and confirmed receipt of the other leg
- Time zone differences in FX widen this window.
- DvP and PvP rule
- DvP: security ↔ cash. PvP: currency A ↔ currency B. Each leg final only if the other is final
- Both remove principal risk; neither removes market risk before settlement.
- Multilateral netting of pay-ins
- Net pay-in per currency = Σ amounts to pay − Σ amounts to receive
- Used by CLS to lower funding needs. Gross trade value is much larger than net pay-in.
Quick revision
- Collateral reduces exposure to a counterparty but does not remove it.
- Variation margin settles current mark-to-market changes; initial margin covers potential future moves during close-out.
- The margin period of risk is the time from the last successful margin exchange to close-out and replacement of the position.
- A longer margin period of risk means larger potential exposure, even with daily margining.
- Thresholds and minimum transfer amounts leave uncollateralised exposure.
- Segregation protects posted initial margin if the collateral taker fails; rehypothecation reuses collateral and adds risk for the poster.
- A haircut cuts the credit given for collateral to allow for price and FX volatility; riskier or more volatile assets get larger haircuts.
- Wrong-way risk arises when collateral value or exposure moves adversely with the counterparty's credit quality.
- Margin calls in stress can drain liquidity and create procyclical funding pressure.
- A CCP becomes buyer to every seller and seller to every buyer through novation, and relies on margin and default resources.
- Settlement risk includes principal risk, where one leg is paid and the other is not; payment-versus-payment arrangements reduce it in foreign exchange.
- Delivery-versus-payment links the transfer of securities to the transfer of cash and cuts principal risk.
Common mistakes
- Treating the threshold as a deductible that is paid only once Fix: The threshold is the exposure left unsecured at all times. The call is exposure minus threshold, every time.
- Applying the MTA to the exposure instead of the call Fix: Compute the call first. The MTA is tested against the call amount.
- Assuming daily margining means zero exposure. Fix: Always think of residual exposure over the MPOR. Collateral is fixed while the portfolio keeps moving.
- Scaling exposure linearly with the MPOR. Fix: Use √time for volatility under the standard model. Doubling MPOR multiplies exposure by about 1.41.
- Treating IM and VM as the same thing. Fix: IM covers potential future loss over the MPOR; VM tracks current mark-to-market and is exchanged to remove current exposure.
- Saying IM is netted between the two counterparties. Fix: Under the uncleared rules, both parties post IM to each other on a gross basis. Netting applies only within a netting set to compute each side's amount.
- Multiplying by H instead of (1 − H). Fix: The haircut is the cut. Value kept = (1 − H). A 10% haircut on 100 gives 90.
- Adding the FX haircut to the price haircut when the question gives a multiplicative rule, or the reverse. Fix: Use the method the question states. If none is stated, multiply the two (1 − H) factors and say so.
- Saying a CCP eliminates counterparty risk. Fix: Say it replaces many bilateral exposures with one exposure to the CCP and concentrates risk.
- Mixing up initial and variation margin. Fix: VM settles current gains and losses. IM protects against future losses during close-out.
Exam tips
- Always list threshold, MTA and haircut before calculating. Questions often hide one of them in the text.
- Watch the direction of the haircut. Divide to size a posting, multiply to value holdings.
- For concept questions, link IM to the margin period of risk and VM to current mark-to-market.
- Expect interpretation questions on residual risk. Name the threshold, MTA, gaps in timing and wrong-way risk.
- Read the MPOR components in the stem. Dispute time and close-out time are often added to the remargining interval.
- If a question changes the MPOR, reach for square-root scaling first, then add any fixed threshold.
- Name the concept precisely: variation margin covers current exposure, while the MPOR creates the residual exposure.
- Remember the Basel floor of 10 business days for daily-margined non-cleared OTC netting sets, and that it increases in stress or for illiquid portfolios.