FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II
The Failure Mechanics of Dealer Banks: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Leverage ratio (balance sheet)
- Leverage = Total assets ÷ Equity
- Higher leverage means a smaller asset price fall wipes out equity.
- Equity loss from asset decline
- Equity loss % = Asset fall % × Leverage
- Valid before any new capital raised or assets sold; wipe-out occurs when asset fall % = 1 ÷ Leverage.
- Repo haircut
- Haircut = (Collateral value − Cash lent) ÷ Collateral value
- The haircut is the dealer's own funding per unit of collateral.
- Cash raised in repo
- Cash lent = Collateral value × (1 − Haircut)
- A rise in haircut cuts cash raised from the same collateral.
- Funding gap from haircut increase
- Gap = Collateral value × (New haircut − Old haircut)
- Dealer must fund this gap from other sources or by selling assets.
- Leverage ratio (balance sheet)
- Leverage = Total assets ÷ Equity
- Higher leverage means a smaller asset fall wipes out equity.
- Equity loss threshold
- Fall in assets that wipes out equity = Equity ÷ Total assets = 1 ÷ Leverage
- With leverage of 25, a 4% fall in asset value eliminates equity.
- Repo haircut and cash raised
- Cash borrowed = Collateral value × (1 − haircut)
- A higher haircut means less cash for the same collateral, so the dealer needs more own funding.
- Funding gap from a haircut increase
- Extra funding needed = Collateral value × (new haircut − old haircut)
- The dealer must replace this cash immediately or sell assets.
- Solvency vs liquidity test
- Insolvent: assets < liabilities. Illiquid: cannot pay obligations when due, even if assets ≥ liabilities.
- A run can turn illiquidity into insolvency through fire sales.
- Haircut
- Haircut = (Market value of collateral − Cash lent) ÷ Market value of collateral
- The haircut is the borrower's equity in the trade. A rise in haircut is a loss of funding even if the repo rolls.
- Cash raised in repo
- Cash = Collateral market value × (1 − haircut)
- Use the same collateral value and the new haircut to find funding lost.
- Funding shortfall from a haircut rise
- Shortfall = Collateral value × (new haircut − old haircut)
- Assumes the repo rolls and collateral value is unchanged. If prices also fall, recompute cash raised from scratch.
- Leverage from haircut
- Maximum asset-to-equity multiple on repo-funded assets = 1 ÷ haircut
- This applies to a position funded entirely by repo at that haircut, with the haircut portion funded by equity. A 2% haircut allows 50 times; at 10% it falls to 10 times. This is why haircut shocks force deleveraging.
- Liquidity survival check
- Liquidity buffer − (repo not rolled + extra haircuts + client withdrawals + collateral calls) ≥ 0
- A negative result means the bank cannot survive the stress horizon without outside help.
- Leverage ratio (simple)
- Leverage = Total assets ÷ Equity
- Higher leverage means a small asset fall wipes out equity. Dealers ran very high leverage before 2008.
- Liquidity pool adequacy
- Survival horizon = Liquidity pool ÷ Daily net stressed outflow
- Use unencumbered, liquid assets after haircuts. This is a simple approximation, not a regulatory formula.
- Haircut and funding
- Cash raised = Market value of collateral × (1 − haircut)
- Higher haircuts in a stress mean less cash per unit of collateral, so the dealer must fund the gap.
- Equity wipe-out
- Asset fall that wipes out equity = 1 ÷ Leverage
- At 30 times leverage, a fall of about 3.3% in asset value eliminates equity.
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
- LCR = Stock of high-quality liquid assets ÷ Total net cash outflows over the next 30 days ≥ 100%
- Short-term resilience under a 30-day stress. Net outflows = outflows − min(inflows, 75% of outflows).
- Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR)
- NSFR = Available stable funding ÷ Required stable funding ≥ 100%
- Structural, one-year horizon. Targets reliance on short-term wholesale funding.
- Loss absorption order in resolution
- Equity first → then TLAC-eligible long-term debt (written down or converted) → operating liabilities protected
- Under SPOE, losses at subsidiaries are passed up to the parent's equity and debt holders.
- Key rule: why bankruptcy is disorderly
- Safe harbours for repo and derivatives → immediate termination and collateral sale → fire sales and funding freeze
- Contrast with the automatic stay, which normally delays creditor action.
Quick revision
- Dealers hold large trading inventories funded mostly by short-term secured borrowing and thin equity.
- High leverage means a small fall in asset value causes a large loss relative to equity.
- Maturity mismatch: assets may be hard to sell quickly, while funding rolls over daily or in days.
- A repo is a secured loan; a higher haircut means the dealer must put up more of its own funding for the same assets.
- Rising haircuts force asset sales, which push prices down and cause more losses and more haircut increases.
- Prime brokerage clients can withdraw cash balances and free credits quickly when they worry about the dealer.
- A run can happen even when the collateral is good, because lenders only need to doubt the dealer's survival.
- Bear Stearns lost secured funding access quickly and was sold with central bank support.
- Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy and its failure spread stress through counterparties and funding markets.
- Dealer failure creates fire sales, counterparty losses and frozen collateral for other firms.
- Reforms target the failure points: higher capital, liquidity rules, stronger resolution tools and better repo practices.
- In an exam scenario, identify the funding channel first, then the feedback loop, then the policy remedy.
Common mistakes
- Treating repo as unsecured borrowing Fix: Remember repo is a collateralised loan. Lender risk depends on collateral value and haircut, not only on dealer credit.
- Confusing haircut with the interest rate Fix: The haircut is the equity-funded part of the collateral. The repo rate is the cost on the cash lent.
- Treating a dealer run like a retail deposit run. Fix: Remember that dealer runs involve professional lenders, repo haircuts and collateral calls, with no deposit insurance.
- Saying a liquidity failure means the firm is insolvent. Fix: Define each by its test. Insolvency compares assets with liabilities. Illiquidity is about meeting payments on time. Fire sales can link them.
- Treating the haircut as the amount the lender loses. Fix: The haircut is the borrower's own funding in the trade. The lender is protected by it.
- Assuming secured funding cannot run. Fix: Secured lenders run by not rolling or by raising haircuts. They do not need to wait for default.
- Saying Lehman was rescued like Bear Stearns. Fix: Remember Bear was sold to JPMorgan with Fed support; Lehman filed for Chapter 11.
- Treating the liquidity pool as a fixed safe buffer. Fix: Check whether assets are unencumbered and how quickly stressed outflows can drain them.
- Saying bankruptcy is disorderly because creditors are paid too slowly. Fix: For dealers the problem is the opposite: repo and derivative counterparties can act immediately, causing fire sales.
- Treating LCR and NSFR as the same rule. Fix: LCR is a 30-day stress ratio on liquid assets. NSFR is a one-year structural funding ratio.
Exam tips
- Expect short case vignettes that give assets, equity and a haircut. Do the arithmetic first, then interpret.
- Know the loop: haircut rise, forced sale, price fall, further haircut rise. Questions often ask which step amplifies the run.
- Distinguish funding liquidity risk from market liquidity risk, and say how they reinforce each other.
- Read options carefully. Wrong options often describe repo as unsecured or ignore the haircut.
- Link the topic to Bear Stearns and Lehman: both relied on short-term secured funding that lenders stopped rolling.
- Expect case-style questions describing a dealer's funding mix. Name the feature (maturity mismatch, leverage, wholesale funding, opacity) before looking at the options.
- Know the liquidity versus solvency definitions precisely. Distractors often swap them.
- Use equity ÷ assets for loss thresholds. Check that you did not use the leverage multiple as a percentage.