ACCA Applied Skills · Performance Management
Performance Analysis for ACCA Performance Management
Performance analysis in ACCA PM is about judging how well a business, division or manager is doing. You pick suitable measures, such as ROI, residual income, balanced scorecard indicators, value for money or ratios, calculate them correctly, and then interpret the results in the scenario's context.
What this chapter covers
This chapter covers how organisations measure and judge performance. You start with responsibility centres and the idea that a manager should be judged only on what they control. You then move to financial measures (ROI and residual income), broader frameworks such as the balanced scorecard, and non-financial indicators. You also look at not-for-profit bodies, where profit is not the goal, and at transfer pricing between divisions.
The chapter ends with ratio analysis used as a performance tool. This is where calculation and comment come together. You compute profitability, liquidity, efficiency and gearing ratios, then explain what they say about the business.
The chapter links to the rest of PM in several ways. Budgeting and variances tell you how a manager performed against plan. Costing gives you the profit figures that feed ROI and RI. Decision-making topics, such as relevant costs, appear again in transfer pricing. Section C questions often combine these, so this chapter is rarely tested alone.
Performance analysis can appear in all three sections of the PM exam: as single objective questions, as part of an objective test case, and as a written Section C question that asks you to calculate and then comment. Calculations such as ROI, RI and transfer prices are short and score reliably once you know the method. The discussion parts reward clear, scenario-based comment, which many students skip. Objective questions are marked all or nothing, so precise definitions and exact method matter. Time spent here pays back because the techniques are used across the paper.
Performance analysis: topics in the order to study them
- 1Performance Measurement and Responsibility CentresIt sets the foundation: what is being measured, who controls it, and the idea of controllable versus uncontrollable items.
- 2Return on Investment and Residual IncomeThese are the core divisional financial measures and the most calculation-heavy part, so learn them while the responsibility centre ideas are fresh.
- 3Balanced ScorecardIt shows the limits of purely financial measures and gives a structure you can reuse for non-financial indicators.
- 4Other Performance Frameworks and Non-Financial IndicatorsIt builds on the scorecard by adding other models and examples of indicators you can apply to a scenario.
- 5Value for Money and Not-for-Profit PerformanceIt applies the same thinking where profit is not the objective, using economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
- 6Transfer PricingIt needs responsibility centres and divisional performance first, because the price set affects each division's reported results.
- 7Ratio Analysis in Performance EvaluationIt pulls everything together: calculate, compare and comment, which is the pattern of a Section C answer.
How to prepare Performance analysis
Treat this chapter as a mix of short calculations and structured comment. Practise both, and practise them together.
- Learn each definition and formula in your own words, then write them from memory until they are automatic.
- Work through ROI and RI examples with different investment decisions, and check whether each decision helps or harms the division and the group.
- Build a scorecard for a few different scenarios. For each of the four perspectives, write one measure and one reason it fits the business.
- Practise value for money using economy, efficiency and effectiveness, and always tie each point to the facts given.
- Do transfer pricing questions with spare capacity and with no spare capacity. Compare the minimum and maximum acceptable prices.
- Calculate a full set of ratios from sample accounts, then write three or four comments that give a reason, not just a direction.
- Finish with timed objective questions and at least one full Section C style question, writing the comment parts in full.
Common mistakes in Performance analysis
Using inconsistent profit or capital figures in ROI and RI
Fix: Write down your definition of profit and capital employed before calculating, and apply it to every option you compare.
Concluding that a higher ROI always means accept the project
Fix: Compare the project's return with the division's current ROI and with the cost of capital, and also compute RI. Say which decision benefits the group.
Listing the four scorecard perspectives without applying them
Fix: Pick measures that fit the business given, explain what each shows, and say why it matters to the strategy.
Confusing economy, efficiency and effectiveness
Fix: Economy is low cost of inputs, efficiency is output per unit of input, and effectiveness is achieving objectives. Test each with a simple example.
Setting a transfer price without considering capacity
Fix: First check whether the seller has spare capacity. Then add any lost contribution to marginal cost to find the minimum price.
Writing ratio comment that only states the movement
Fix: Give a likely cause, say whether it is good or bad, and note what more information you would need.
Last-day revision: Performance analysis
- Judge a manager on controllable items only; separate manager performance from division performance.
- ROI = profit ÷ capital employed × 100%. Define profit and capital employed the same way each time.
- RI = profit − (capital employed × required rate of return).
- ROI can make managers reject projects that are good for the group; RI is less likely to do so.
- The balanced scorecard has four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, and innovation and learning.
- Every non-financial indicator should link to a strategic aim and be measurable.
- Value for money = economy, efficiency and effectiveness.
- Not-for-profit bodies need measures linked to their objectives, which are often hard to quantify.
- Minimum transfer price = marginal cost + opportunity cost to the group.
- With spare capacity in the selling division, the opportunity cost is nil, so the minimum price is marginal cost.
- Ratios mean little alone; compare with prior years, targets or competitors.
- In written answers, state the point, give the reason, and link it to the scenario.
Performance analysis practice questions
- In Fitzgerald and Moon's Building Block model, which of the following is a 'dimension' rather than a 'standard' or 'reward' block?
- A hospital uses the Balanced Scorecard. Which of the following measures would normally be classified under the 'internal business process' p…
- A division has sales of $900,000, a net profit margin of 10% and capital employed of $600,000. What is the division's return on capital empl…
- A hospital trust adopts a balanced scorecard. Which measure is most appropriate for its customer perspective?
- Which type of responsibility centre is a department whose manager is accountable for both revenues and costs, and also for decisions on inve…
- A manufacturer's balanced scorecard includes the following measure: percentage of revenue generated from products launched in the last two y…
- Which of the following statements about the Performance Prism is correct?
- Division Q has operating profit of $270,000 and capital employed of $1,500,000. Its manager is considering a project that costs $200,000 and…
Performance analysis in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Performance analysis: frequently asked questions
Is performance analysis only tested in written questions?
No. It can appear in objective questions, objective test cases and constructed response questions. Calculations such as ROI, RI and transfer prices suit objective questions, while the frameworks and ratios often appear in written answers.
Should I learn ROI or residual income first?
Learn ROI first, then residual income. RI builds directly on the same profit and capital figures, and comparing the two is a common exam point.
How do I score well on the discussion parts?
Make each point short and complete: state it, explain why, and link it to the scenario. Generic textbook lists score poorly compared with comment that uses the facts given.
How much of this chapter is calculation?
A fair share, mainly ROI, RI, transfer pricing and ratios. Even so, the interpretation matters in written questions, so practise explaining what each result means for the business.