Actuarial Mathematics for Modelling · Non-unit reserves for unit-linked contracts (zeroisation)
Non-Unit Reserves and Negative Cash Flows in Unit-Linked Contracts
Updated 11 October 2026
A non-unit reserve is money held from the insurer's own funds so that future negative non-unit cash flows can be paid without strain. You find it by working backwards from the end of the term. Each year you hold just enough to make the reserve-adjusted profit zero when it would otherwise be negative.
Understand Non-Unit Reserves and Negative Cash Flows
A unit-linked policy has two parts. The unit fund holds the policyholder's money, invested in units. The non-unit fund holds the insurer's own money: charges taken from the policy, less expenses, less the cost of benefits above the unit fund.
The non-unit cash flow in a year is the charges taken from the policy, less expenses and the extra cost of benefits above the unit fund, plus interest on the non-unit money. In early years, expenses such as commission are high and charges are low. So the non-unit cash flow is often negative. In later years it can turn positive.
A negative cash flow in year t has to be paid from somewhere. If the insurer has nothing set aside, it must find the cash from other sources at that time. A non-unit reserve is held so that a negative cash flow in a later year can be paid. The reserve required at the end of a year must be funded from that year's positive cash flow. Where that cash flow is not enough, the shortfall is met from shareholder capital. This shortfall, which usually arises at the start of the policy because of initial expenses, is called new business strain. The reserve is not what covers the strain. Setting up the reserve at time 0 is what creates it.
Reserves carry money forward in time. Earlier positive cash flows are held back to pay later negative ones. A later positive cash flow cannot fund an earlier negative one. You find the reserves by working backwards from the end of the term, because each reserve depends on the reserve needed at the next date. At each date you ask: what must I hold now so that, with interest, and allowing for survival, I can pay next year's negative cash flow after the reserve I need then?
The aim of zeroisation is to hold the smallest reserves that make every future reserve-adjusted cash flow at least zero. Any positive cash flow that is left becomes profit. Negative cash flows are removed by the reserve.
Key rules to remember
- Non-unit cash flow in year t
- NUCF_t = charges received − expenses − extra benefit costs + interest on the non-unit money held
- Build it from your table: charges less expenses, add interest, then deduct expected death and surrender costs in excess of the unit fund. Check the contract's timing.
- Zeroisation condition (cash flow at start of year)
- (tV + CF_{t+1}) × (1 + i) − p_{x+t} × t+1V ≥ 0
- tV is the reserve held at the start of year t+1, per policy in force at that time. CF_{t+1} is the non-unit cash flow at the start of year t+1, per policy in force at the start of the year. Reserves are set at the smallest values, never below zero, that satisfy this condition. It holds with equality whenever tV is positive. If tV is zero, it can hold with a strict inequality, and the excess is profit.
- Zeroisation condition (cash flow at end of year)
- tV × (1 + i) + CF_{t+1} − p_{x+t} × t+1V ≥ 0
- Use this when CF_{t+1} arises at the end of the year. tV is held at the start of the year, per policy in force at that time. The worked examples on this page use this end-of-year form.
- Backward recursion for the reserve (cash flow at start of year)
- tV = max(0, p_{x+t} × t+1V ÷ (1 + i) − CF_{t+1})
- Use this only when CF_{t+1} is at the start of the year and is per policy in force at that time. Here i is the reserving interest rate and t+1V is the reserve needed at the end of the year. The cash flow already includes the expected cost of decrements. Read the question's timing first.
- Backward recursion for the reserve (cash flow at end of year)
- tV = max(0, (p_{x+t} × t+1V − CF_{t+1}) ÷ (1 + i))
- Use this when CF_{t+1} arises at the end of the year, per policy in force at the start of the year. This is the form used in the worked examples. The reserve is floored at zero. A positive cash flow in a later year cannot reduce a reserve needed earlier. It only reduces the reserve needed at the start of its own year.
- Reserve-adjusted cash flow (cash flow at start of year)
- Adjusted CF_{t+1} = (tV + CF_{t+1}) × (1 + i) − p_{x+t} × t+1V
- Use this for cash flows at the start of the year. Zeroisation makes the adjusted cash flow zero whenever tV is positive. Otherwise it is zero or positive.
- Reserve-adjusted cash flow (cash flow at end of year)
- Adjusted CF_{t+1} = tV × (1 + i) + CF_{t+1} − p_{x+t} × t+1V
- Use this for cash flows at the end of the year. Zeroisation makes the adjusted cash flow zero whenever tV is positive. Otherwise it is zero or positive.
How to solve Non-Unit Reserves and Negative Cash Flows questions
Use the same sequence for any question. Write the timing assumptions first, because the formula depends on them.
- 1Write down the non-unit cash flows for each future year, with the timing used in the question: start of year, end of year or mid-year.
- 2Note the reserving interest rate and the survival probabilities for each year. Check whether the cash flows are already per policy in force or per policy at the start.
- 3Find the last year with a negative cash flow. Years after the last negative cash flow need no reserve.
- 4Start at the end of the term. Set the reserve at the end of the final year to zero.
- 5Work back one year. Reserve at start of year t = (p × reserve at end of year − cash flow at the right date, brought to the same date) ÷ (1 + i), using the question's timing. If the result is negative, set the reserve to zero.
- 6Repeat for each earlier year until you reach time 0.
- 7Check by working forward: the reserve-adjusted cash flow must be zero or positive each year, and zero in the years that needed a reserve.
- 8Form the profit vector from the reserve-adjusted cash flows, then multiply each element by the probability of being in force at the start of that year (from policy inception) to get the profit signature.
Quickest way: Backward table method
When to use it: Use it when the question gives a table of non-unit cash flows with a reserving rate and survival probabilities and asks for the reserves at the start or end of each year.
- Draw a row for each year with columns for cash flow, reserve at start, reserve at end.
- Fill the last year first. Put 0 in the end reserve for the final year.
- Compute the start reserve using the formula that fits the timing. Floor it at zero.
- Move up one row. The start reserve of this year becomes the end reserve target for the previous year.
- Forward-check one year. If the adjusted cash flow is not zero where a reserve exists, find the error.
Common mistakes in Non-Unit Reserves and Negative Cash Flows
Working forwards from time 0.
Valuation questions usually look forward from a date, so students apply the same habit.
Fix: Start from the last year, where the end reserve is zero, and work back.
Holding a negative reserve in a year when later cash flows are positive.
Students see a positive future and let it offset the present.
Fix: Floor each reserve at zero. A negative reserve would be borrowing against future profit, which zeroisation does not allow.
Discounting at the wrong date or using the wrong interest rate.
The reserving rate can differ from the rate in the profit test, and the cash flows may fall at different points in the year.
Fix: Mark the timing of each cash flow on a time line and use the reserving rate given for the reserve calculation.
Forgetting to multiply by the survival probability.
Students treat the reserve as certain, not as held only for survivors.
Fix: The reserve at the end of year t is held only for policies still in force, so weight it by p_{x+t}, unless the cash flows are already per policy in force.
Reserving for the whole of future negative cash flows rather than only the strain.
Students forget that positive cash flows in the same year already cover part of the strain.
Fix: Reserve only the shortfall after that year's own cash flow and interest.
Confusing unit reserves with non-unit reserves.
Both appear in the same contract and both are reserves.
Fix: The unit reserve equals the unit fund and backs the policyholder's units. The non-unit reserve is the insurer's extra money and is the only one found by zeroisation.
Worked examples
Example 1
A three-year unit-linked policy has non-unit cash flows at the end of each year, per policy in force at the start of that year, of −₹300, +₹100 and +₹500 for years 1, 2 and 3. The reserving interest rate is 5% a year. Survival probability is 0.98 in each year. Find the non-unit reserves at the start of each year using zeroisation. Take the reserve at the end of year 3 as zero. Reserves are per policy in force at the date they are held.
Show the solution
- The condition for each year is: reserve at start × 1.05 + cash flow − 0.98 × reserve at end ≥ 0. Take the smallest reserve at the start that is not below zero.
- Year 3: the cash flow is +₹500 and the end reserve is 0. No strain, so the start reserve at time 2 is 0.
- Year 2: the cash flow is +₹100 and the end reserve at time 2 is 0. No strain, so the start reserve at time 1 is 0.
- Year 1: the cash flow is −₹300 and the end reserve at time 1 is 0. The condition is V0 × 1.05 − 300 − 0.98 × 0 = 0, so V0 = 300 ÷ 1.05 = ₹285.71.
- The survival probability does not change V0 here, because no reserve is carried to the end of year 1. It would matter if the end reserve were above zero.
- Check: 285.71 × 1.05 = 300.00, so the adjusted cash flow at the end of year 1 is zero.
Answer: Reserves at the start of years 1, 2 and 3 are ₹285.71, ₹0 and ₹0. Only year 1 needs a reserve.
Example 2
A two-year policy has non-unit cash flows at the end of each year of +₹200 in year 1 and −₹400 in year 2. Each cash flow is per policy in force at the start of that year. Reserving interest is 4% a year and the probability of surviving each year is 0.95. Find the reserve needed at time 1 and at time 0, taking the reserve at the end of year 2 as zero. Reserves are per policy in force at the date they are held.
Show the solution
- Year 2: the cash flow is −₹400 at the end of year 2 and the end reserve is 0, so the strain is ₹400 per policy in force at time 1.
- Reserve needed at time 1: V1 × 1.04 − 400 = 0, so V1 = 400 ÷ 1.04 = ₹384.62.
- Year 1: the cash flow at the end of year 1 is +₹200 per policy in force at time 0. The reserve needed at the end of year 1 is V1 = ₹384.62 for each survivor.
- Per policy at time 0, the reserve needed at the end of year 1 is 0.95 × 384.62 = ₹365.38.
- Resources at the end of year 1 per policy at time 0 are V0 × 1.04 + 200. Set equal to 365.38.
- V0 × 1.04 = 165.38, so V0 = 165.38 ÷ 1.04 = ₹159.02.
- Check: 159.02 × 1.04 = 165.38 and 165.38 + 200 = 365.38, which funds the reserve for survivors.
Answer: The reserve at time 1 is ₹384.62 and the reserve at time 0 is ₹159.02.
Exam tips
- Write the timing of each cash flow beside the table before you calculate anything. Most lost marks come from timing slips.
- State your assumption that reserves are floored at zero, and show the floor when it applies.
- Do the forward check in the margin. It takes under a minute and catches most arithmetic errors.
- In multiple-choice questions, first decide which years have negative cash flows. Reserves are usually zero in the later years, which cuts the options quickly.
- For written answers, show the formula in words and symbols, the working, and the result with rupee units.
Practice questions from Non-unit reserves for unit-linked contracts (zeroisation)
- In a profit test of a unit-linked contract, the non-unit cash flows are projected and non-unit reserves are set by zeroisation. What does ze…
- A unit-linked policy has non-unit cash flows (before reserves, per policy in force at the start of the year, at year end) of CF2 = -50, CF3 …
- In calculating non-unit reserves for a unit-linked contract by zeroisation, which statement describes the reserve requirement correctly?
- For a unit-linked policy, which item below is normally part of the non-unit cash flow rather than the unit cash flow?
- A unit-linked policy has non-unit reserves of Rs 40 at time 1 and Rs 30 at time 2, each per policy in force at that time. During year 2 the …
Non-Unit Reserves and Negative Cash Flows: frequently asked questions
Why are non-unit reserves needed for unit-linked contracts?
Early non-unit cash flows are often negative because of high initial expenses. Without a reserve the insurer would have to fund that strain from other money at the time. A reserve sets aside funds in advance so the contract does not strain the company.
What does zeroisation mean?
Zeroisation means holding the smallest reserve that makes every future reserve-adjusted cash flow at least zero. Negative cash flows are removed, and any positive amount left is profit. It is found by working backwards.
Why do I work backwards when finding the reserve?
The reserve at each date depends on what is needed at the next date. The end of the term is known to need zero, so you start there. Each earlier reserve then follows from the one after it.
Can a non-unit reserve be negative?
Not under zeroisation. If the calculation gives a negative value, the reserve is set to zero. A negative reserve would mean counting on future profits to pay for present costs.