Economic Modelling · Measures of investment risk
Value at Risk and Tail Value at Risk (VaR and TVaR)
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Value at Risk (VaR) at level α is the loss threshold that is exceeded with probability only 1 − α over a stated period. Tail Value at Risk (TVaR) is the expected loss given that the loss is at least the VaR. For a normal loss, VaR = μ + z·σ. TVaR is always at least as large as VaR.
Understand Value at Risk and Tail Value at Risk
A risk measure turns the uncertainty in a loss into a single number. Variance does this, but it treats gains and losses alike and says little about extreme outcomes. VaR and TVaR focus on the bad tail of the loss distribution.
Value at Risk at confidence level α (for example 95% or 99%) over a time horizon is the smallest loss x such that P(L ≤ x) ≥ α. In plain words: with probability α, the loss will not exceed the VaR. A one-day 99% VaR of ₹10 lakh means you expect to lose more than ₹10 lakh on only about 1 day in 100. You must always quote the level and the horizon. Here L is a loss, so a positive number means money lost.
Tail Value at Risk (also called expected shortfall) answers the question VaR ignores: when the loss does exceed the VaR, how bad is it on average? TVaR_α is the average of the VaR values from α to 1. That is the average loss in the worst (1 − α) share of probability. For a continuous loss this equals E[L | L ≥ VaR_α], which is the conditional tail expectation. For a discrete loss the two can differ, so state which definition you use. Because TVaR averages over the whole tail, it is never smaller than VaR.
Coherence. A risk measure ρ is coherent if it satisfies four properties: monotonicity, translation invariance, positive homogeneity and subadditivity. Subadditivity means combining two portfolios should not increase risk: ρ(X + Y) ≤ ρ(X) + ρ(Y). This captures diversification. VaR is not subadditive in general, so it can say a merged portfolio is riskier than the parts. TVaR defined as expected shortfall is coherent. The conditional tail expectation form E[L | L ≥ VaR] is coherent for continuous distributions, but it can fail subadditivity for discrete losses.
Strengths and weaknesses. VaR is simple, easy to communicate and easy to estimate, and it is used in regulation. Its weaknesses: it ignores losses beyond the threshold, it is not always subadditive, it can be unstable at high confidence levels, and it depends on the model and data used. TVaR captures tail severity and, as expected shortfall, is coherent, but it is harder to estimate because tail data are scarce, and it depends heavily on the assumed tail shape.
Key rules to remember
- Value at Risk
- VaR_α = smallest x such that P(L ≤ x) ≥ α
- L is the loss. For a continuous distribution, P(L ≤ VaR_α) = α. Always state α and the time horizon.
- VaR for a normal loss
- VaR_α = μ + z_α × σ
- L ~ N(μ, σ²). z_α is the standard normal value with Φ(z_α) = α. Common values: z = 1.645 (95%), z = 2.326 (99%).
- Tail Value at Risk
- TVaR_α = (1 ÷ (1 − α)) × ∫ from α to 1 of VaR_u du
- Average loss in the worst (1 − α) of probability (expected shortfall). For a continuous loss this equals E[L | L ≥ VaR_α]. For a discrete loss, E[L | L ≥ VaR_α] can differ from it (see the worked example).
- TVaR for a normal loss
- TVaR_α = μ + σ × φ(z_α) ÷ (1 − α)
- φ is the standard normal density, φ(z) = e^(−z²/2) ÷ √(2π). Applies to a normal loss.
- Scaling over time
- σ over n periods = σ × √n, mean over n periods = n × μ
- Valid only if period returns are independent and identically distributed with the same variance.
- Coherence conditions
- Monotonicity; ρ(X + c) = ρ(X) + c; ρ(kX) = kρ(X) for k > 0; ρ(X + Y) ≤ ρ(X) + ρ(Y)
- All four must hold. VaR fails subadditivity in general. TVaR defined as expected shortfall satisfies all four. The E[L | L ≥ VaR] form is coherent for continuous losses but can fail subadditivity for discrete losses.
How to solve Value at Risk and Tail Value at Risk questions
Use this method for any VaR or TVaR question, whether it asks you to calculate, compare or comment.
- 1Define the loss L clearly. Loss is positive when money is lost. If you are given returns, the loss is the negative of the return times the portfolio value.
- 2Note the confidence level α and the time horizon. Convert the mean and standard deviation to that horizon first, using n × μ and σ√n if returns are independent.
- 3Identify the distribution. If it is normal, use VaR = μ + zσ. If it is discrete or empirical, find the smallest value whose cumulative probability reaches α.
- 4Find the correct z-value or cumulative probability from tables. Check that you are using the upper tail for losses.
- 5For TVaR, average the losses at or beyond the VaR. For a discrete case, weight each tail loss by its probability and divide by the tail probability. For a normal, use μ + σφ(z) ÷ (1 − α).
- 6Check that TVaR ≥ VaR. If not, there is an error.
- 7For discussion parts, comment on the assumptions, tail behaviour, coherence and the data limits. Link comments to the numbers in your answer.
Quickest way: Normal VaR and TVaR in three lines
When to use it: Use when the loss is normal or the question gives mean, standard deviation, a confidence level and a horizon.
- Scale to the horizon: μ_n = nμ, σ_n = σ√n.
- VaR = μ_n + z × σ_n, with z = 1.645 for 95% or 2.326 for 99%.
- TVaR = μ_n + σ_n × φ(z) ÷ (1 − α). For 95% the multiplier is about 2.063; for 99% it is about 2.665.
Common mistakes in Value at Risk and Tail Value at Risk
Treating a return as a loss and getting the sign wrong.
Questions often give returns, but VaR is defined on losses.
Fix: Write L = −(return) × value first. For a normal return R, the loss is −R, and VaR at 95% is −μ_R + 1.645σ_R times the value.
Forgetting to scale mean and standard deviation to the horizon.
Students plug in one-day figures for a ten-day question.
Fix: Multiply the mean by n and the standard deviation by √n before using z. State the independence assumption.
Using the wrong tail, for example z = −1.645 for a loss VaR.
Mixing up the left tail of returns with the right tail of losses.
Fix: For losses, use the upper-tail z with Φ(z) = α, which is positive for α above 0.5.
Saying VaR is the maximum possible loss.
The word 'risk' suggests a worst case.
Fix: Say VaR is a threshold exceeded with probability 1 − α. Losses can be far larger.
Claiming VaR is always non-coherent or always coherent.
Memorising a slogan without the condition.
Fix: Say VaR fails subadditivity in general, though it is subadditive for some distributions such as the normal (for α ≥ 0.5). TVaR is coherent.
Computing a discrete TVaR by averaging only the loss values, ignoring probabilities.
Treating tail outcomes as equally likely.
Fix: Weight each tail loss by its probability and divide by the total tail probability.
Worked examples
Example 1
A portfolio worth ₹10,00,000 has annual returns that are normally distributed with mean 8% and standard deviation 15%. Calculate the one-year 95% VaR and TVaR of the loss in rupees. Use z = 1.645 and φ(1.645) = 0.1031.
Show the solution
- Loss L = −R × 10,00,000. So L is normal with mean −0.08 × 10,00,000 = −₹80,000 and standard deviation 0.15 × 10,00,000 = ₹1,50,000.
- VaR = μ + zσ = −80,000 + 1.645 × 1,50,000 = −80,000 + 2,46,750 = ₹1,66,750.
- TVaR = μ + σ × φ(z) ÷ (1 − α) = −80,000 + 1,50,000 × 0.1031 ÷ 0.05.
- 0.1031 ÷ 0.05 = 2.062. So 1,50,000 × 2.062 = 3,09,300.
- TVaR = −80,000 + 3,09,300 = ₹2,29,300.
Answer: One-year 95% VaR ≈ ₹1,66,750 and TVaR ≈ ₹2,29,300. TVaR exceeds VaR, as it must.
Example 2
A loss L (in ₹ lakh) has the distribution: 0 with probability 0.90, 10 with probability 0.06, 20 with probability 0.03 and 50 with probability 0.01. Find the 95% VaR and the 95% TVaR. Then explain why TVaR gives more information.
Show the solution
- Cumulative probabilities: P(L ≤ 0) = 0.90; P(L ≤ 10) = 0.96; P(L ≤ 20) = 0.99; P(L ≤ 50) = 1.
- The smallest x with P(L ≤ x) ≥ 0.95 is 10. So VaR = ₹10 lakh.
- For TVaR with a discrete loss, take the top 5% of probability. It consists of 0.01 at 50, 0.03 at 20 and 0.05 − 0.04 = 0.01 at 10, where 0.04 = 0.01 + 0.03 is the probability above 10.
- Tail expected loss = (0.01 × 50 + 0.03 × 20 + 0.01 × 10) ÷ 0.05.
- Numerator = 0.5 + 0.6 + 0.1 = 1.2. Then 1.2 ÷ 0.05 = 24.
- TVaR = ₹24 lakh, which is greater than VaR of ₹10 lakh.
Answer: 95% VaR = ₹10 lakh and 95% TVaR = ₹24 lakh, defined as the average of the top 5% of probability mass (expected shortfall). VaR only gives the threshold; TVaR shows the average size of losses beyond it, including the ₹50 lakh outcome that VaR hides. The conditional tail expectation E[L | L ≥ VaR] is a different quantity for this discrete loss: P(L ≥ 10) = 0.06 + 0.03 + 0.01 = 0.10, the numerator is 0.01 × 50 + 0.03 × 20 + 0.06 × 10 = 1.7, and 1.7 ÷ 0.10 = 17. State which definition you are using.
Exam tips
- State the confidence level, horizon and the sign convention for loss before calculating. Marks are often given for definitions.
- Write the formula in notation first, then substitute. In written answers, show the z-value you used and its source.
- For comparison questions, use a standard structure: definition, calculation, tail information, coherence, ease of estimation.
- When asked about coherence, name all four properties and say which ones VaR fails and why, ideally with a short diversification example.
- If you are asked to comment on a normal assumption, mention that real losses often have fat tails, so a normal model may understate both VaR and TVaR.
Practice questions from Measures of investment risk
- An investor in a pension fund is concerned only with the chance that the annual return falls below a target level of 6%. Which risk measure …
- Annual losses on a portfolio are normal with mean -₹2 crore (a gain) and standard deviation ₹5 crore. Using z=1.645 for 95%, what is the 95%…
- Returns on a fund have mean 8% and standard deviation 12% and are assumed normally distributed. A new fund has returns equal to 2 + 1.5 time…
- Asset X has a standard deviation of 20% and asset Y has a standard deviation of 10%. A portfolio holds 50% in each, and the correlation betw…
- An investor in a Mumbai-based mutual fund defines shortfall probability as the probability that the annual return falls below a chosen thres…
Value at Risk and Tail Value at Risk: frequently asked questions
What is the difference between VaR and TVaR?
VaR is a threshold: the loss that is exceeded with probability 1 − α. TVaR is the average loss in the worst (1 − α) of outcomes, beyond that threshold. TVaR therefore describes tail severity and is never below VaR.
How do I calculate VaR for a normal distribution?
Scale the mean and standard deviation to the horizon, then use VaR = μ + zσ for the loss. Use z = 1.645 for 95% and 2.326 for 99%. Check that you are working with losses, not returns.
Why is VaR not a coherent risk measure?
VaR can fail subadditivity: the VaR of a combined portfolio can exceed the sum of the individual VaRs. This contradicts the idea that diversification reduces risk. TVaR is coherent when defined as expected shortfall, or as E[L | L ≥ VaR] for continuous losses. The conditional tail expectation form can fail subadditivity for discrete losses.
What are the main limitations of VaR?
It ignores the size of losses beyond the threshold, may not be subadditive, and depends on the assumed distribution and data. Estimates at high confidence levels can be unstable because few observations lie in the tail.