Skip to content

Financial Reporting · Financial Instruments: Equity and Financial Liabilities

Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments (Ind AS 109 Appendix D)

Updated 5 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Appendix D to Ind AS 109 covers a debt-for-equity swap, where a debtor issues its own equity instruments to a creditor to settle a financial liability. Equity issued is consideration paid. Measure it at fair value, derecognise the liability, and take the difference to profit or loss. If equity fair value is unreliable, use the liability's fair value.

Understand Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments

A company that cannot repay a loan in cash may renegotiate. The lender agrees to take shares instead. This is a debt-for-equity swap. The debtor's liability goes away and its equity increases. Appendix D (the Ind AS equivalent of IFRIC 19) tells you how to account for it.

Appendix D deals with the debtor's books only. It applies when a debtor and creditor renegotiate terms and the creditor accepts the debtor's equity instruments to extinguish all or part of a financial liability. It does not apply where the creditor is also a direct or indirect shareholder acting in its capacity as an existing shareholder. It also does not apply where the creditor and entity are controlled by the same party before and after the swap and the substance is a capital distribution or contribution by the controlling party. It does not apply where extinguishing the liability follows the original terms of the contract, for example a conversion option in a compound instrument.

The issues the Appendix answers are: (1) Are the entity's equity instruments issued 'consideration paid' under the derecognition rules of Ind AS 109? (2) How should the entity measure the equity issued? (3) How should it account for the difference between the liability's carrying amount and the equity measured? (4) How should it treat a partial settlement?

The answers are as follows. Equity instruments issued are consideration paid, so the liability is derecognised (fully or partly) when this consideration is given. The equity is measured at its fair value on the date the liability is extinguished. If that fair value cannot be reliably measured, measure the equity by reference to the fair value of the liability extinguished. The difference between the carrying amount of the liability extinguished and the measured equity is recognised in profit or loss.

If only part of the liability is extinguished, the entity must judge whether some of the consideration relates to a modification of the remaining liability. If so, it splits the consideration between the part extinguished and the part that modifies the remainder. Any such modification is then assessed under the derecognition and modification rules for the remaining liability.

Key rules to remember

Measurement of equity issued
Equity issued = fair value of equity instruments on the date the liability is extinguished
Primary measurement. Use the fair value of the liability extinguished only if the equity's fair value cannot be reliably measured.
Gain or loss on extinguishment
Gain/(loss) = carrying amount of liability extinguished – fair value of equity issued
Positive means gain in profit or loss. Negative means loss in profit or loss. The amount is not taken to equity.
Journal entry (full settlement)
Dr Financial liability (carrying amount); Cr Equity (fair value of shares issued); Cr/Dr Profit or loss (balancing figure)
Credit share capital for face value and securities premium for the rest, as per the Companies Act.
Partial settlement
Consideration paid is allocated between the part of the liability extinguished and the part that is retained
If part of the consideration relates to a modification of the remaining liability, allocate it and assess that modification separately.
Scope exclusion
No Appendix D where the creditor acts as an existing shareholder, or where the transaction is a capital transaction between parties under common control, or where the settlement is under the original contract terms
State the exclusions with their conditions. Do not say that shareholder-creditors are always excluded.

How to solve Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments questions

Use this order for any question on debt-for-equity swaps. It protects you from picking the wrong measurement basis.

  1. 1Check scope. Is the debtor issuing its own equity to a creditor to settle a financial liability under renegotiated terms? Rule out creditor acting as shareholder, common-control capital transactions and settlement under original terms such as a conversion option.
  2. 2Fix the extinguishment date. This is the date the equity is issued and the liability is settled. Use the fair value on this date, not the date of agreement.
  3. 3Find the carrying amount of the liability extinguished. Include accrued interest and use amortised cost where the liability is so measured.
  4. 4Measure the equity issued at fair value (number of shares × fair value per share). Use the liability's fair value only if the equity's fair value is not reliably measurable.
  5. 5Compute the difference: carrying amount minus equity measured. Recognise it in profit or loss, as gain or loss.
  6. 6Split the equity into share capital (face value) and securities premium. Pass the journal entry.
  7. 7If settlement is partial, decide whether part of the consideration relates to modification of the remaining liability. Allocate it, then account for the remainder under the rules for modification.
  8. 8Disclose the gain or loss separately if it is material, as the standards on presentation require.

Quickest way: Three-line swap check

When to use it: Use it for a short MCQ or a 5-mark question where the numbers are simple.

  1. Write the liability carrying amount. Write the fair value of shares issued on the settlement date.
  2. Subtract: carrying amount minus fair value of shares. Positive is a gain, negative is a loss, both in profit or loss.
  3. Credit equity at fair value, not at the amount of debt. Face value goes to share capital and the rest to securities premium.

Common mistakes in Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments

  • Crediting equity with the carrying amount of the debt and showing no gain or loss.

    Students assume the swap is a simple transfer from liability to equity.

    Fix: Measure equity at fair value and take the difference to profit or loss. Equity issued is consideration paid.

  • Using the fair value of shares on the date of the agreement.

    The question gives several dates, and the first one looks natural.

    Fix: Use the fair value on the date the liability is extinguished, which is when the equity is issued.

  • Recognising the gain directly in equity or other comprehensive income.

    Students think a transaction with a lender in its capacity as investor is an equity transaction.

    Fix: Under the Appendix, the difference goes to profit or loss. Equity transactions with owners in that capacity are outside scope.

  • Applying Appendix D to a conversion option exercised under the original terms.

    Both situations involve issuing shares against debt.

    Fix: Appendix D covers renegotiated settlement. Conversion under original terms follows the compound instrument rules.

  • Ignoring accrued interest when finding the carrying amount.

    Only the principal is highlighted in the question.

    Fix: Include accrued interest and amortised cost adjustments in the liability's carrying amount before computing the difference.

  • Treating the whole transaction as an extinguishment when only part of the debt is settled.

    Students overlook the partial settlement guidance.

    Fix: Check whether part of the consideration relates to modification of the remaining liability. Allocate the consideration and assess the remaining liability.

Worked examples

Example 1

Case: Kaveri Ltd (an Ind AS company) owes ₹50,00,000 to Bharat Bank, which is the carrying amount of a term loan including accrued interest. Kaveri is in distress and the bank agrees to accept 4,00,000 equity shares of ₹10 face value in full settlement. The shares are issued on 31 March 2027 when their fair value is ₹11 per share. The bank holds no shares in Kaveri. Show the accounting.

Show the solution
  1. Scope: the debtor issues its own equity to a creditor under renegotiated terms, and the bank is not acting as an existing shareholder. Appendix D applies.
  2. Fair value of equity issued = 4,00,000 × ₹11 = ₹44,00,000.
  3. Carrying amount of liability extinguished = ₹50,00,000.
  4. Gain = ₹50,00,000 – ₹44,00,000 = ₹6,00,000, recognised in profit or loss.
  5. Share capital = 4,00,000 × ₹10 = ₹40,00,000. Securities premium = 4,00,000 × ₹1 = ₹4,00,000.
  6. Entry: Dr Term loan ₹50,00,000; Cr Share capital ₹40,00,000; Cr Securities premium ₹4,00,000; Cr Profit or loss (gain on extinguishment) ₹6,00,000.

Answer: Kaveri Ltd recognises a gain of ₹6,00,000 in profit or loss. Equity increases by ₹44,00,000 (share capital ₹40,00,000 and securities premium ₹4,00,000), and the loan of ₹50,00,000 is derecognised.

Example 2

Case: Meru Ltd has a debenture liability with a carrying amount of ₹30,00,000. It issues 2,00,000 shares of ₹10 each to the debenture holder in full settlement. The shares are unlisted and their fair value cannot be reliably measured. The fair value of the debenture liability extinguished is ₹27,00,000. Show the accounting and explain the measurement basis.

Show the solution
  1. Scope: this is a renegotiated settlement through issue of the debtor's own equity, so Appendix D applies.
  2. The fair value of the shares cannot be reliably measured. Appendix D then requires the equity to be measured by reference to the fair value of the liability extinguished.
  3. Equity measured = ₹27,00,000.
  4. Gain = ₹30,00,000 – ₹27,00,000 = ₹3,00,000, in profit or loss.
  5. Share capital = 2,00,000 × ₹10 = ₹20,00,000. Securities premium = ₹27,00,000 – ₹20,00,000 = ₹7,00,000.
  6. Entry: Dr Debentures ₹30,00,000; Cr Share capital ₹20,00,000; Cr Securities premium ₹7,00,000; Cr Profit or loss ₹3,00,000.

Answer: Equity is measured at ₹27,00,000, the fair value of the liability extinguished, because the share value is not reliably measurable. Meru Ltd recognises a gain of ₹3,00,000 in profit or loss.

Exam tips

  • Open every answer with the scope test. Marks are often given for stating that creditor-as-shareholder and common-control capital transactions are excluded.
  • Write the measurement hierarchy clearly: fair value of equity first, fair value of liability only as a fallback.
  • Always show the gain or loss as a separate line in profit or loss. Never put it in equity.
  • In case-scenario MCQs, check the date given for the share price. The correct one is the extinguishment date.
  • For part-settlement questions, state that you must assess whether part of the consideration relates to modification of the remaining liability.

Practice questions from Financial Instruments: Equity and Financial Liabilities

Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments: frequently asked questions

What is Appendix D to Ind AS 109?

It is the Ind AS equivalent of IFRIC 19 and deals with the debtor's accounting when it issues its own equity to a creditor to settle a financial liability. It covers whether the equity is consideration paid, how to measure it and where to recognise the difference.

Where is the gain on a debt-for-equity swap recognised?

It is recognised in profit or loss. It equals the carrying amount of the liability extinguished minus the measured value of the equity issued.

At what value are the shares recorded in a debt-for-equity swap?

At their fair value on the date the liability is extinguished. Only if that fair value cannot be reliably measured do you use the fair value of the liability extinguished.

Does Appendix D apply when a lender who is already a shareholder takes shares?

Not where the creditor is acting in its capacity as an existing shareholder. Check the capacity in which it acts. The same applies to common-control capital transactions and to settlement under the original contract terms.