Indirect Tax Laws · Liability to Pay in Certain Cases
Liability in Other Special Cases and Recovery Priorities (CA Final Indirect Tax)
Updated 5 October 2026 · Fact-checked
These provisions say who pays GST dues when the taxpayer cannot. A legal representative pays after a proprietor's death. HUF or AOP members pay jointly and severally after partition or disruption (Section 93). A Court of Wards or court-appointed manager is liable as the taxable person would be (Section 92). Government dues are also a first charge on property (Section 82).
Understand Liability in Other Special Cases and Recovery Priorities
GST dues do not vanish when the taxpayer dies, the group breaks up, or a court takes over the estate. The law names someone else to pay. Your job in the exam is to spot the situation, name the person liable, and state the limit of that liability.
Death of a person liable to tax (Section 93). Section 93 begins with the words 'Save as otherwise provided under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016'. Two cases arise on death. Under Section 93(1)(a), if the business is continued after death by the legal representative or any other person, that person is liable for the tax, interest and penalty due from the deceased. If the business is discontinued, before or after death, the legal representative is liable only out of the estate of the deceased, to the extent the estate can meet the dues. This applies whether the dues were determined before death or after it.
HUF or association of persons (Section 93). Section 93 also covers partition or disruption. If the person liable is a HUF or an AOP and it is partitioned or disrupted, each member or partner as it stood immediately before the partition or disruption is jointly and severally liable. The liability covers dues up to the time of partition or disruption, whether they are determined before or after it. Joint and several means the department can recover the whole amount from any one member. How the members share the burden among themselves is their private matter. Section 93 covers only these two situations: death, and partition or disruption of a HUF or AOP.
Court of Wards and court-managed estates (Section 92). Where the estate or business of a taxable person is under the Court of Wards, the Administrator-General, the Official Trustee, or a receiver or manager appointed by a court, that person is liable for the tax in the same manner and to the same extent as the taxable person would have been. The law treats the manager as running the business for the owner. Do not cite Section 93 for this. Section 91 is a separate provision: it deals with the liability of guardians, trustees and agents of incapacitated persons.
Priority of dues. Do not confuse these with the first charge. Under Section 82, any tax, interest or penalty payable to the Government is the first charge on the property of the taxable person or other person liable. Section 82 opens with 'Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any law for the time being in force, save as otherwise provided in the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016'. Both Section 82 and Section 93 are expressly subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. So Section 93 tells you who pays on death or partition, Section 92 tells you who pays when a court manages the estate, and Section 82 tells you that Government dues rank first against the property.
Key rules to remember
- Death, business continued (Section 93(1)(a))
- Legal representative or other person continuing the business = liable for the tax, interest and penalty due from the deceased
- Section 93(1)(a) makes the continuing person liable for the dues of the deceased.
- Death, business discontinued
- Liability of legal representative = lower of (dues) and (value of estate available to meet the charge)
- Discontinuance may happen before or after death. Dues determined after death are also covered.
- HUF or AOP partition or disruption (Section 93)
- Each member or partner immediately before partition = jointly and severally liable for dues up to the date of partition or disruption
- The department may recover the whole from any one member. Dues determined after the partition are covered.
- Court of Wards and court-appointed managers (Section 92)
- Court of Wards, Administrator-General, Official Trustee, receiver or manager = liable in the same manner and extent as the taxable person
- Applies where the estate or business is under their management. This is Section 92, not Section 93. Section 91 deals with guardians, trustees and agents of incapacitated persons.
- First charge on property (Section 82)
- Tax, interest and penalty payable to Government = first charge on the property of the person liable
- Section 82 is expressly subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. It overrides other laws that say otherwise.
How to solve Liability in Other Special Cases and Recovery Priorities questions
Use this order for any case question on special liability. Answer in provision, facts, conclusion form.
- 1Identify the person originally liable: proprietor, HUF, AOP, ward or an estate under management.
- 2Identify the event: death, partition or disruption, or court management.
- 3Match the event to the rule: death goes to the legal representative (Section 93), partition goes to members jointly and severally (Section 93), court management goes to the manager (Section 92).
- 4For death, check whether the business was continued or discontinued. This decides whether liability is full or limited to the estate.
- 5Check the period covered. For HUF or AOP it is dues up to the date of partition or disruption, whether determined before or after.
- 6If the facts mention insolvency, note that both Section 82 and Section 93 are subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, so the insolvency provisions must be considered.
- 7If the question asks about ranking against other creditors, add that the dues are the first charge on property under Section 82.
- 8Write the conclusion with the amount each person must pay or the cap on it.
Quickest way: Event, person, limit
When to use it: Use this when a case gives several facts and you have about five minutes for a 5-mark answer.
- Underline the event: died, partitioned, disrupted, court-appointed manager.
- Write the person who now pays next to it.
- Write the limit: full dues, estate only, or joint and several.
- Add one line: dues are a first charge on property under Section 82, if ranking is asked.
- Compute the amount only if figures are given, and state the conclusion in one sentence.
Common mistakes in Liability in Other Special Cases and Recovery Priorities
Saying the legal representative is always liable for the full dues after death.
Students remember the liability but forget the discontinuance limit.
Fix: Ask whether the business was continued. If discontinued, liability is only out of the estate to the extent it can meet the dues.
Limiting a HUF member's liability to his own share.
Students assume liability follows shares in the partition.
Fix: The liability is joint and several. The department can recover all dues from any one member. Shares matter only between the members themselves.
Excluding dues determined after the death or partition.
Students think the demand must exist before the event.
Fix: The law covers dues whether determined before or after the death, partition or disruption, as long as they relate to the period up to that event.
Attributing the first charge on property to Section 93.
The topic title groups priority with special liability, so the two provisions blur.
Fix: Section 93 decides who pays on death or partition. The first charge on property is Section 82. Cite each for its own purpose.
Citing Section 93 or Section 91 for the Court of Wards, Administrator-General, Official Trustee, receiver or manager.
Students lump all special-liability provisions under one section.
Fix: Cite Section 92 for court-managed estates. Section 91 deals with guardians, trustees and agents of incapacitated persons. Section 93 covers only death and partition or disruption of a HUF or AOP.
Assuming Section 82 is the only section subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Students remember the saving words in the first-charge section and assume the liability sections have no such saving.
Fix: Both Section 82 and Section 93 are expressly subject to the Code. If a case involves insolvency, consider the Code's provisions along with either section.
Worked examples
Example 1
Mohan, a sole proprietor and registered person, died on 10 August. GST dues of ₹4,00,000 (tax, interest and penalty) relating to his business are unpaid. Case A: his son Rohit continues the business. Case B: Rohit closes the business after Mohan's death. The estate left by Mohan is worth ₹2,50,000. State Rohit's liability in each case.
Show the solution
- Event: death of a person liable to pay tax. Section 93 applies.
- Case A: the business is continued by the legal representative. The continuing person is liable for the tax, interest and penalty due from the deceased.
- So in Case A, Rohit is liable for the full ₹4,00,000.
- Case B: the business is discontinued. The legal representative is liable only out of the estate of the deceased, to the extent the estate can meet the charge.
- Estate available is ₹2,50,000, which is less than the dues of ₹4,00,000. So Rohit's liability is capped at ₹2,50,000.
- The same holds even if the dues are determined only after Mohan's death. The balance of ₹1,50,000 cannot be recovered from Rohit personally.
Answer: Case A: Rohit is liable for the full ₹4,00,000. Case B: Rohit is liable only out of the estate, up to ₹2,50,000.
Example 2
Sharma HUF, a registered person, was partitioned among its three members A, B and C on 31 December. Before partition, GST dues of ₹6,00,000 had arisen. A demand order for this amount was passed in the following March. A had received half of the family property. The department proposes to recover the full amount from A. Is the proposal valid?
Show the solution
- The person liable is a HUF, and it has been partitioned. Section 93 applies.
- Each member immediately before the partition is jointly and severally liable for the dues up to the date of partition.
- The order was passed after the partition, but the provision covers dues determined before or after it. The dues relate to a period before 31 December, so they are covered.
- Joint and several liability means the department can recover the whole ₹6,00,000 from any one of A, B or C.
- A's share of the property does not limit what the department can recover. A may seek contribution from B and C, but that is a private matter among the members.
Answer: Yes. A is jointly and severally liable, so the department may recover the entire ₹6,00,000 from A. A can then claim contribution from B and C.
Exam tips
- Case questions on this topic usually test one trigger: death, partition or court management. Name the trigger in your first line.
- On death, always state both limbs: liability for the dues if the business is continued and estate-limited liability if it is discontinued.
- Use the words jointly and severally for HUF and AOP. Examiners look for these exact words.
- Keep Section 82, Section 92 and Section 93 separate in your answer. Cite 82 only when the question is about ranking of Government dues over other claims. Do not use Section 91 for court-appointed managers; it deals with guardians and trustees.
- Where figures are given, compare the dues with the estate value and state the capped amount in one clear line.
Practice questions from Liability to Pay in Certain Cases
- Mehta HUF, a registered taxable person, partitioned its property among members Raj, Sunil and a group comprising Tara and her son on 1 Janua…
- Ramesh was a guardian running a business for his ward Ishaan, a minor, and was registered under GST as the taxable person. The guardianship …
- Kapoor & Sons, a registered partnership with partners Dev and Esha, admitted Farhan as a new partner and Esha retired in the same reconstitu…
- Ramesh Agarwal, a sole proprietor registered under GST, died on 10 June leaving unpaid tax of ₹3,00,000 for earlier periods. His son Mahesh …
- M/s Sharma & Verma, a partnership firm, was dissolved on 31 March. Its partners were Anil, Bhavna and Chetan. In July, the proper officer de…
Liability in Other Special Cases and Recovery Priorities: frequently asked questions
Who pays GST dues after a proprietor dies?
If the business is continued after death, the legal representative or other person continuing it is liable for the dues of the deceased. If the business is discontinued, the legal representative pays only out of the estate, to the extent it can meet the dues. This is covered in Section 93.
Are members of a HUF or AOP liable after partition?
Yes. Each member or partner immediately before the partition or disruption is jointly and severally liable for the dues up to the date of partition or disruption. Dues determined after the partition are included. This is in Section 93.
Is Section 93 the section on first charge on property?
No. Section 93 deals with who pays on death, and on partition or disruption of a HUF or AOP. The first charge of tax dues on property is in Section 82, which is expressly subject to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
What is the liability of a Court of Wards or a court-appointed receiver?
Under Section 92, where the estate or business of a taxable person is under the Court of Wards, the Administrator-General, the Official Trustee, or a receiver or manager appointed by a court, that person is liable in the same manner and extent as the taxable person. The law treats the manager as running the business on the owner's behalf. Do not confuse this with Section 91, which deals with guardians, trustees and agents of incapacitated persons.