CA Final · Indirect Tax Laws · Liability to Pay in Certain Cases
Ramesh was a guardian running a business for his ward Ishaan, a minor, and was registered under GST as the taxable person. The guardianship ended when Ishaan became a major on 1 January. In March, an order determined tax and interest for periods up to 31 December. Who is liable for these dues under the CGST Act?
Ishaan, the ward, is liable. When guardianship terminates, the ward becomes liable for the tax, interest or penalty due from the guardian-taxable person up to the time of termination, whether it was determined before termination or afterwards.
- ARamesh alone, because he was the registered taxable person
- BIshaan, the ward, is liable for dues up to the time guardianship terminated, even though determined laterCorrect
- CNeither, since the minor cannot be a taxable person
- DThe dues must be written off after termination of guardianship
Explanation
Where the taxable person is a guardian carrying on business for a ward, and the guardianship terminates, the ward is liable for tax, interest or penalty due up to termination. This applies even if determined after termination. Hence Ramesh-only liability is incorrect.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Liability to Pay in Certain Cases shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Liability to Pay in Certain Cases questions
- Kavya Textiles HUF, a registered taxable person, has a tax demand of ₹4,50,000 for the period up to 31 March. On 1 April the HUF property wa…
- M/s Sundaram Traders, a partnership firm with partners Anil, Bhaskar and Chitra, was dissolved on 31 March. A tax demand for supplies made u…
- A Hindu Undivided Family, Mehta HUF, registered under GST, partitioned its business property among its members Hari, Isha and Jay on 15 Dece…
- Sharma & Verma Traders, a partnership firm with partners Sharma, Verma and Gupta, was dissolved on 31 March. GST, interest and penalty of Rs…
- Ramesh Iyer, a sole proprietor registered under GST, died on 10 August leaving tax of Rs 4,00,000 unpaid for earlier periods. His son Karthi…
- Meena, a minor, was carrying on a trading business through her guardian Suresh, who was registered under GST on her behalf. Suresh owed tax …