Skip to content

Advanced Accounting · AS 23 Accounting for Investments in Associates in Consolidated Financial Statements

AS 23 Disclosures and Exclusion from Equity Method for CA Inter

Updated 4 October 2026 · Fact-checked

AS 23 excludes an associate from the equity method when the investment is held only for disposal in the near future, or the associate works under severe long-term restrictions on transferring funds to the investor. Such investments follow AS 13. For all others, apply the equity method, test the whole carrying amount for impairment under AS 28, and make the required disclosures.

Understand AS 23 Disclosures and Exclusion from Equity Method

AS 23 applies when an investor prepares consolidated financial statements and holds an associate. An associate is an enterprise in which the investor has significant influence and which is neither its subsidiary nor a joint venture. Significant influence means the power to take part in financial and operating policy decisions without controlling them. It is presumed when the investor holds 20% or more of the voting power, directly or through subsidiaries, unless you can clearly show otherwise.

The normal rule is the equity method. You record the investment at cost and then adjust the carrying amount for the investor's share of the associate's post-acquisition profits or losses. The equity method applies only in consolidated financial statements. In the investor's separate financial statements, the investment in an associate is accounted for under AS 13 on a cost basis.

In consolidated financial statements, AS 23 gives two exceptions. First, the investment is acquired and held exclusively with a view to disposal in the near future. Second, the associate operates under severe long-term restrictions that significantly impair its ability to transfer funds to the investor. In both cases the investment is accounted for under AS 13, as an investment, not under the equity method.

The equity method is also discontinued from the date the investor ceases to have significant influence, whether or not it keeps the shares. If the enterprise becomes a subsidiary, AS 21 applies and the investor consolidates it. Otherwise, the carrying amount on that date becomes its cost from then on, and AS 13 applies.

Impairment is a special point. Goodwill or capital reserve on acquisition sits inside the carrying amount of the investment and is not shown separately. So you test the whole carrying amount as a single asset under AS 28, comparing it with its recoverable amount. Any loss is not split to goodwill. If the recoverable amount later rises, the loss can be reversed as AS 28 allows.

For contingencies, the investor discloses its share of the associate's contingencies and capital commitments for which it is also contingently liable. It also discloses contingencies that arise because it is severally liable for all or part of the associate's liabilities. The disclosure rules sit alongside these.

Key rules to remember

Presumption of significant influence
Voting power ≥ 20% → presumed significant influence; < 20% → presumed none
Both presumptions can be rebutted, but only if clearly demonstrated. Disclose the reason when the investor holds 20% or more but concludes it has no significant influence, or holds under 20% but concludes it has.
Exclusions from equity method
(a) Held exclusively for disposal in near future; or (b) severe long-term restrictions on transfer of funds → account under AS 13
Learn both conditions. The standard wording is 'held exclusively with a view to disposal in the near future' and 'severe long-term restrictions'.
Carrying amount under equity method
Cost + Share of post-acquisition profits (or − losses) − Dividends received − Impairment loss
Cost includes goodwill, or is net of capital reserve, on acquisition. Dividends reduce the carrying amount.
Goodwill / capital reserve on acquisition
Cost of investment − Investor's share of net assets (equity) of associate at acquisition
A positive result is goodwill. A negative result is capital reserve. Both stay inside the carrying amount.
Impairment loss
Carrying amount − Recoverable amount, if carrying amount is higher
Recoverable amount is the higher of net selling price and value in use (AS 28). Test the whole investment, not goodwill alone.
Losses beyond carrying amount
Stop recognising losses when carrying amount reaches zero; resume only after share of profits equals unrecognised losses
The carrying amount is not taken below zero.

How to solve AS 23 Disclosures and Exclusion from Equity Method questions

Use this order for any question on exclusion, disclosure, impairment or contingencies under AS 23.

  1. 1Check that an associate exists: significant influence (20% or more presumed), and the enterprise is not a subsidiary or joint venture.
  2. 2Check the two exclusions. Is the shareholding exclusively for near-future sale? Are there severe long-term restrictions on remitting funds? Ordinary restrictions or a short delay do not qualify.
  3. 3If an exclusion applies, say that the investment is accounted for under AS 13 and that the equity method is not used. If neither applies, use the equity method in consolidated financial statements. In separate financial statements, use AS 13.
  4. 4Compute the carrying amount: cost, plus share of profit, less dividends, less losses. Show goodwill or capital reserve at acquisition inside cost.
  5. 5For impairment, compare the whole carrying amount with the recoverable amount. Charge the difference to profit and loss and do not allocate it to goodwill.
  6. 6For contingencies, state the investor's share of the associate's contingencies and capital commitments, and any several liability of the investor.
  7. 7List the disclosures: the associates, with the proportion of ownership interest and, if different, the proportion of voting power; the methods used to account for them; the goodwill or capital reserve included in the carrying amount; and the reasons for not using the equity method where an associate is excluded. Also disclose the reason when the investor holds 20% or more but concludes it has no significant influence, or holds under 20% but concludes it has.
  8. 8Write the conclusion as a clear sentence with the standard name.

Quickest way: Two-condition test and impairment single-line

When to use it: Use this for MCQs and for short theory or scenario answers where time is tight.

  1. Underline the facts: percentage held, purpose of holding, and any restriction on funds.
  2. Tick the exclusion test. Near-future disposal only, or severe long-term restriction. If either is ticked, write AS 13 and stop.
  3. If neither is ticked, write equity method (consolidated statements only) and compute the carrying amount in one line.
  4. For impairment, write: carrying amount − recoverable amount = loss, charged to profit and loss, not to goodwill.
  5. In MCQs, remove options that treat temporary control as an AS 23 exclusion, that allocate impairment to goodwill, or that show losses taking the investment below zero. In written answers, use the format: provision, facts, conclusion.

Common mistakes in AS 23 Disclosures and Exclusion from Equity Method

  • Treating any holding below 20% as outside AS 23 without checking facts.

    The 20% figure is learnt as a hard rule.

    Fix: It is only a presumption. Below 20% with clearly demonstrated significant influence, an associate exists. Disclose the reason in either direction: 20% or more with no significant influence, or under 20% with significant influence.

  • Excluding an associate because of any restriction on dividends.

    Students stop reading at the word restriction.

    Fix: Only severe long-term restrictions that significantly impair the transfer of funds qualify. A temporary or minor limit does not.

  • Allocating an impairment loss to goodwill first.

    This is how AS 28 treats a cash generating unit, and students carry it over.

    Fix: Under AS 23, goodwill is not separately recognised. Test the whole carrying amount as one asset and do not allocate the loss.

  • Accounting for an excluded investment under the equity method or AS 21.

    Students forget what replaces the equity method.

    Fix: Write that investments covered by the exclusions are accounted for under AS 13.

  • Applying the equity method in the investor's separate financial statements.

    Students forget that AS 23 applies to consolidated financial statements.

    Fix: In separate financial statements, account for the investment in an associate under AS 13 on a cost basis. Use the equity method only in consolidated statements.

  • Taking the carrying amount below zero when the associate keeps making losses.

    Share of loss is deducted mechanically.

    Fix: Stop recognising losses once the carrying amount is nil. Resume only when your share of later profits equals the unrecognised losses.

  • Forgetting to deduct dividends received from the carrying amount.

    Dividends are seen as income, as in cost-based accounting.

    Fix: Under the equity method, a dividend reduces the investment and is not income. Add share of profit, then deduct the dividend.

Worked examples

Example 1

X Ltd holds three investments. (i) 35% of B Ltd, acquired and held exclusively for sale in the near future. (ii) 40% of C Ltd, which operates in a country with severe long-term exchange restrictions that significantly impair its ability to transfer funds to X Ltd. (iii) 25% of D Ltd, with no restrictions, and X Ltd takes part in D Ltd's policy decisions. State the treatment of each in X Ltd's consolidated financial statements.

Show the solution
  1. Test (i): the holding is above 20%, but it is acquired and held exclusively for disposal in the near future. This is the first exclusion.
  2. Test (ii): the holding is above 20%, but the associate works under severe long-term restrictions that significantly impair fund transfers. This is the second exclusion.
  3. Test (iii): 25% is above 20%, and there is participation in policy decisions, so significant influence exists. Neither exclusion applies.
  4. Apply the treatment: (i) and (ii) follow AS 13; (iii) follows the equity method under AS 23.

Answer: B Ltd and C Ltd are accounted for under AS 13 as investments, not under the equity method. D Ltd is an associate and is accounted for under the equity method.

Example 2

On 1 April, P Ltd bought 30% of Q Ltd for ₹90,00,000. Q Ltd's net assets at that date were ₹2,50,00,000. For the year, Q Ltd's profit was ₹40,00,000 and it paid a dividend of ₹10,00,000. At year end, the recoverable amount of P Ltd's investment is ₹85,00,000. Compute the carrying amount at year end and the impairment loss.

Show the solution
  1. Share of net assets at acquisition = 30% × ₹2,50,00,000 = ₹75,00,000.
  2. Goodwill inside cost = ₹90,00,000 − ₹75,00,000 = ₹15,00,000. It is not shown separately.
  3. Share of profit = 30% × ₹40,00,000 = ₹12,00,000.
  4. Share of dividend = 30% × ₹10,00,000 = ₹3,00,000, deducted from the investment.
  5. Carrying amount before impairment = ₹90,00,000 + ₹12,00,000 − ₹3,00,000 = ₹99,00,000.
  6. Compare with the recoverable amount of ₹85,00,000. Impairment loss = ₹99,00,000 − ₹85,00,000 = ₹14,00,000.
  7. Charge the loss to profit and loss. Do not allocate it to the goodwill of ₹15,00,000. New carrying amount = ₹85,00,000.

Answer: The carrying amount before impairment is ₹99,00,000. The impairment loss is ₹14,00,000, charged to profit and loss, and the carrying amount becomes ₹85,00,000.

Exam tips

  • Write the two exclusions word for word in theory answers, and add that AS 13 applies instead.
  • In disclosure questions, give a bullet list: associates with proportion of ownership interest and, if different, voting power; methods used; goodwill or capital reserve included in the carrying amount; reasons for non-equity accounting where an associate is excluded; the reason where the 20% presumption is overridden in either direction; and the share of contingencies and capital commitments.
  • In impairment problems, show goodwill inside the carrying amount, then one comparison with recoverable amount. State clearly that nothing is allocated to goodwill.
  • In RTP and MTP-style scenarios, check each restriction for severity and duration before excluding.
  • Where the associate's reporting date differs, note that adjustments are made for significant transactions in the gap. Also state that, where policies differ, adjustments are made and, if impracticable, the fact is disclosed.

Practice questions from AS 23 Accounting for Investments in Associates in Consolidated Financial Statements

AS 23 Disclosures and Exclusion from Equity Method: frequently asked questions

When is an associate excluded from the equity method under AS 23?

There are two cases. The investment is acquired and held exclusively for disposal in the near future, or the associate operates under severe long-term restrictions that significantly impair its ability to transfer funds to the investor. In both cases the investment is accounted for under AS 13.

How is impairment of an investment in an associate tested?

You test the whole carrying amount of the investment, which includes goodwill, as one asset under AS 28. If the recoverable amount is lower than the carrying amount, the difference is an impairment loss charged to profit and loss. It is not allocated to goodwill.

What contingencies must the investor disclose about an associate?

The investor discloses its share of the associate's contingencies and capital commitments for which it is also contingently liable. It also discloses contingencies arising because it is severally liable for all or part of the associate's liabilities.

What happens if the investor stops having significant influence?

The investor stops using the equity method from the date it ceases to have significant influence, whether or not it keeps the shares. If the enterprise becomes a subsidiary, AS 21 applies. Otherwise the carrying amount on that date becomes the cost and the investment is accounted for under AS 13. Remember that the equity method applies only in consolidated financial statements; in separate statements the investment is under AS 13 throughout.