Corporate Financial Reporting · Accounting of Financial Instruments
Derecognition of Financial Assets and Liabilities under Ind AS 109
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Derecognition is removing a financial asset or liability from the balance sheet. For an asset, you first check whether the cash flow rights expired or the asset was transferred. If transferred, test risks and rewards: transferred means derecognise, retained means keep, neither means test control. If control is kept, recognise only to the extent of continuing involvement.
Understand Derecognition of Financial Instruments
Recognition puts a financial instrument on your balance sheet. Derecognition takes it off. The big question is when. Ind AS 109 does not use legal title alone. It looks at the economics: who still bears the risks and enjoys the rewards of the asset.
An entity derecognises a financial asset when, and only when, (a) the contractual rights to its cash flows expire, or (b) it transfers the asset and the transfer qualifies for derecognition under paragraph 3.2.6. So a transfer is a necessary first step, but it is not enough by itself.
Once there is a transfer, paragraph 3.2.6 gives a three-way test. If substantially all risks and rewards are transferred, derecognise the asset and recognise separately any rights and obligations created or retained. If substantially all are retained, keep recognising the asset. If neither, test control. No control retained means derecognise. Control retained means keep the asset only to the extent of your continuing involvement.
Factoring is the usual exam setting. If a company sells receivables with full recourse for bad debts, it keeps the credit risk, so it usually keeps the receivable and shows a financial liability for the cash received (paragraph 3.2.15). If the sale is without recourse and no risk stays with the seller, the receivable goes off the books.
For liabilities, the logic is simpler. A financial liability is removed when it is extinguished, that is, discharged, cancelled or expired. If you settle it by issuing your own shares, the difference between the liability's carrying amount and the consideration paid goes to profit or loss. A substantial modification of terms is treated as extinguishment of the old liability and recognition of a new one.
Key rules to remember
- When to derecognise a financial asset (para 3.2.3)
- Derecognise only when (a) cash flow rights expire, or (b) the asset is transferred and the transfer qualifies under 3.2.6
- Both limbs are 'when, and only when'. A transfer that fails 3.2.6 gives no derecognition.
- Risks and rewards test (para 3.2.6)
- Substantially all transferred → derecognise | Substantially all retained → continue to recognise | Neither → test control
- Control test: control not retained → derecognise; control retained → recognise to extent of continuing involvement.
- Transfer not qualifying (para 3.2.15)
- Continue to recognise the asset in full + recognise a financial liability for consideration received
- Later, show income on the asset and expense on the liability separately. Do not net them.
- Continuing involvement: guarantee (para 3.2.16(a))
- Extent = lower of (asset amount, maximum consideration received that could be required to be repaid)
- The second amount is the guarantee amount.
- Continuing involvement: options (para 3.2.16(b))
- Extent = amount of the transferred asset that the entity may repurchase
- For a written put on an asset measured at fair value, extent is limited to the lower of fair value of the asset and option exercise price.
- Part-asset continuing involvement (para 3.2.20)
- Gain/loss = Consideration received for part no longer recognised − carrying amount allocated to that part
- Allocate the previous carrying amount between the parts on the basis of relative fair values at the transfer date. The difference goes to profit or loss.
- Liability settled with equity (Appendix D, para 9)
- P&L = Carrying amount of liability extinguished − fair value of equity instruments issued (consideration paid)
- Equity is measured at the date the liability is extinguished. A positive result is a gain.
- Option moneyness (B3.2.16)
- Deeply in the money → keep asset | Deeply out of the money → derecognise | Fair value exercise price → derecognise
- Applies to deeply in-the-money call or put options. Readily obtainable asset with an option neither deep in nor out: derecognise.
How to solve Derecognition of Financial Instruments questions
Use the same sequence for every derecognition question on a financial asset. Write each step as a heading in your answer so the examiner can award marks for the logic.
- 1Identify the instrument and ask whether the contractual cash flow rights have expired. If yes, derecognise and stop.
- 2If not, check whether there is a transfer of the asset (paragraph 3.2.4). No transfer means continue to recognise.
- 3Assess risks and rewards: look at recourse, guarantees, options, repurchase terms, and who bears credit, late-payment and price risk.
- 4Classify the outcome: substantially all transferred, substantially all retained, or neither. Use the option guidance, such as deeply in or out of the money, if options exist.
- 5If neither, test control. Ask whether the transferee can sell the asset freely. If it cannot without restrictions, the transferor has retained control.
- 6Pass the entries. Full derecognition: remove the asset, record proceeds, recognise any retained right or obligation separately, and take the difference to profit or loss. Retained: keep the asset and credit a financial liability. Continuing involvement: recognise an asset and an associated liability to the extent of involvement.
- 7For liabilities, check extinguishment or substantial modification, then take the difference between carrying amount and consideration paid to profit or loss.
- 8Add the Ind AS 107 disclosure points if the question asks for them (para 42D for assets not derecognised in their entirety).
Quickest way: Three-question shortcut for transfers
When to use it: Use in MCQs and short case scenarios on factoring, securitisation or sale with options.
- Ask: has the buyer taken over the loss risk? Full recourse, deeply in-the-money options or a guarantee covering most losses means keep the asset.
- Ask: does the seller have no real exposure left, or only a fair value or deeply out-of-the-money option? Then derecognise.
- If the answer is in between, ask who can sell the asset. If the buyer cannot, the seller keeps control and recognises only to the extent of continuing involvement.
- For continuing involvement with a guarantee, take the lower of asset amount and maximum guarantee.
Common mistakes in Derecognition of Financial Instruments
Derecognising a receivable simply because it has been legally sold or factored.
Students follow legal form and ignore the risks and rewards test.
Fix: Always test risks and rewards first. With full recourse for credit losses, the seller usually keeps the asset and records a liability under paragraph 3.2.15.
Skipping the control test when risks and rewards are neither transferred nor retained.
Students treat the test as only two outcomes.
Fix: Remember there are three outcomes. The third needs a control assessment under paragraph 3.2.6(c).
Measuring continuing involvement at the full asset value for a guarantee.
Students forget the 'lower of' rule.
Fix: Take the lower of the asset amount and the maximum consideration that could be required to be repaid (paragraph 3.2.16(a)).
Treating a deeply in-the-money call option as allowing derecognition.
Students focus on the option giving the right, not an obligation to the buyer, and miss that the seller benefits from gains.
Fix: A deeply in-the-money call or put means substantially all risks and rewards are retained. The asset stays on the books (B3.2.16(f)).
Netting the retained asset against the liability for proceeds.
Students think the cash received settles the receivable.
Fix: Show the full asset and a separate financial liability. Income and expense are also recognised separately.
Applying the extinguishment gain on equity settlement using the face value of shares issued.
Students use nominal value of shares instead of the consideration measured at extinguishment date.
Fix: Measure the equity instruments at the date the liability is extinguished, then take the difference from the carrying amount to profit or loss (Appendix D).
Worked examples
Example 1
Alpha Ltd factors trade receivables of ₹50,00,000 (carrying amount) to a bank and receives ₹46,00,000 in cash. Alpha will reimburse the bank for any credit losses on the receivables and for any late payment, so it keeps substantially all risks and rewards. Show the accounting treatment.
Show the solution
- Step 1: There is a transfer of the receivables to the bank for cash.
- Step 2: Alpha bears credit loss and late-payment risk, so it retains substantially all risks and rewards.
- Step 3: Under paragraph 3.2.6(b), Alpha continues to recognise the receivables in full. Under paragraph 3.2.15, it recognises a financial liability for the consideration received.
- Step 4: Entry on receipt: Dr Bank ₹46,00,000; Cr Financial liability (borrowing from factor) ₹46,00,000.
- Step 5: The ₹4,00,000 difference is not a loss on sale. It is the finance cost recognised over time as expense on the liability. Interest or collection income on the receivables is recognised separately.
Answer: Receivables of ₹50,00,000 stay on the balance sheet, with a financial liability of ₹46,00,000. No derecognition and no loss on sale at transfer.
Example 2
Beta Ltd sells a loan portfolio with carrying amount ₹100 lakh to a bank for ₹95 lakh. The bank can freely sell the portfolio. Beta gives a guarantee covering losses up to ₹20 lakh. Beta neither transfers nor retains substantially all risks and rewards. Beta has not retained control. Next, suppose the bank cannot sell the portfolio without Beta's consent so that Beta retains control. State the treatment for each case and the extent of continuing involvement in the second case.
Show the solution
- Step 1: Neither transferred nor retained substantially all risks and rewards, so go to the control test (paragraph 3.2.6(c)).
- Case A: The bank can freely sell the portfolio, so Beta has not retained control. Under 3.2.6(c)(i), derecognise the portfolio and recognise separately any rights and obligations created or retained, here the guarantee obligation. Record the difference between ₹95 lakh proceeds and the ₹100 lakh carrying amount in profit or loss, adjusted for the guarantee recognised.
- Case B: Beta has retained control. Under 3.2.6(c)(ii), it continues to recognise the asset to the extent of continuing involvement.
- Step 2: Continuing involvement for a guarantee is the lower of (i) the asset amount, ₹100 lakh and (ii) the maximum consideration received that Beta could be required to repay.
- Step 3: The guarantee covers losses up to ₹20 lakh, and the question gives no larger amount of consideration at risk. Taking the maximum amount that could be required to be repaid as ₹20 lakh, the lower is ₹20 lakh.
Answer: Case A: derecognise the portfolio and separately recognise the guarantee obligation. Case B: continue to recognise an asset of ₹20 lakh (lower of ₹100 lakh and ₹20 lakh), with an associated liability recognised alongside it.
Exam tips
- In case scenarios, underline words like recourse, guarantee, repurchase and call option. They decide the risks and rewards conclusion.
- Write the three-way test in full in 6-mark and 14-mark answers, even if the answer is obvious. Marks go to the structure.
- For MCQs on options, remember: deeply in the money keeps the asset, deeply out of the money allows derecognition, fair value exercise price allows derecognition.
- Always show a separate liability when an asset stays on the books. Examiners look for it.
- If a question asks for disclosure, link it to Ind AS 107 paragraph 42D for assets not derecognised in their entirety, such as nature of assets, risks and rewards, and carrying amounts of assets and associated liabilities.
Practice questions from Accounting of Financial Instruments
- Which statement about disclosure of the gain or loss arising when equity instruments are issued to extinguish a financial liability under In…
- Bharat Textiles Ltd renegotiated a loan with its lender. The loan has a carrying amount of Rs 50 lakh. Bharat issued equity shares to the le…
- Meera Pharma Ltd extinguishes part of a loan, carrying amount Rs 80 lakh in total, by issuing shares. The portion extinguished has a carryin…
- Sagar Foods Ltd settles part of a loan only. The loan's total carrying amount is Rs 120 lakh. For Rs 30 lakh of the carrying amount, the com…
- Under Ind AS 109 Appendix D, how must an entity present the gain or loss arising from extinguishing a financial liability by issuing equity …
Derecognition of Financial Instruments in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Derecognition of Financial Instruments: frequently asked questions
What is the risks and rewards test in Ind AS 109?
When a financial asset is transferred, you assess whether the entity has transferred substantially all, retained substantially all, or neither. The result decides whether to derecognise, keep the asset, or move to a control test.
Does factoring of receivables always lead to derecognition?
No. If the seller keeps substantially all risks and rewards, for example through full recourse for credit losses, the receivable stays on the balance sheet with a financial liability for the cash received. Derecognition happens only if the transfer qualifies under paragraph 3.2.6.
What is continuing involvement?
It applies when the entity neither transfers nor retains substantially all risks and rewards but retains control. The entity keeps recognising the asset to the extent it remains exposed to changes in the asset's value, for example through a guarantee or option.
When is a financial liability derecognised?
A financial liability is removed when it is extinguished. If its terms are substantially modified, the modification is accounted for as extinguishment of the original liability and recognition of a new one. Settling with equity instruments gives a profit or loss equal to the carrying amount less the consideration paid.