Skip to content

Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · Assessment of Companies

Business Reorganisation: Effect of Tribunal or Court Orders

Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Under section 314, if a High Court, tribunal or Adjudicating Authority order on amalgamation, demerger or merger applies to a past tax year and a return was already filed, the successor must file a modified return within six months from the end of the month of the order. The Assessing Officer then modifies or completes the assessment in line with the order.

Understand Business Reorganisation: Effect of Tribunal or Court Orders

Companies often reorganise through a scheme approved by a High Court, tribunal or an Adjudicating Authority under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The order can apply from an earlier date. So a return filed earlier by the old entity may no longer match the legal position.

Section 314 fixes this. It overrides section 263 (the return-filing section) and requires the successor to file a modified return. The modified return is limited to what the order requires. You cannot use it to reopen unrelated items.

Business reorganisation means amalgamation, demerger or merger of the business of one or more persons. The successor means all resulting companies, whether or not they existed before the reorganisation.

The Assessing Officer's action depends on timing. If assessment or reassessment is already complete when the modified return is filed, the officer passes an order modifying the total income. If it is pending, the officer assesses or reassesses the total income as per the order, taking the modified return into account. In both cases, other provisions of the Act apply and tax is charged at the rates applicable to that tax year.

Section 116 is the related rule on losses. It decides whether accumulated loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating or demerged company pass to the other company, and on what conditions. Section 314 is about procedure; section 116 is about the loss benefit.

Key rules to remember

Time limit for modified return (s. 314(1))
Due date = end of the month in which the order was issued + 6 months
Applies only if a return was already furnished for a tax year to which the order applies. The return must be in the prescribed form and manner.
Who files
Successor = all resulting companies (s. 314(4)(c))
Includes a resulting company that did not exist before the reorganisation.
Order covered
Order of High Court, tribunal or Adjudicating Authority under s. 5(1) of the IBC, 2016
Only these orders trigger section 314.
Assessment already complete
AO passes order modifying total income (s. 314(2)(a))
Based on the order and the modified return.
Assessment pending
AO assesses or reassesses total income per the order (s. 314(2)(b))
Modified return is taken into account.
Rate of tax
Rates applicable to the relevant tax year (s. 314(3))
Not the rates of the year of the order.
Amalgamation loss conditions (s. 116(4))
Amalgamating co: business ≥ 3 years; holds ≥ 3/4 of book value of fixed assets held 2 years before. Amalgamated co: holds ≥ 3/4 of that book value for 5 years; continues business 5 years; meets prescribed conditions
Failing any condition means loss or depreciation set off is deemed income in the year of non-compliance (s. 116(5)).
Eligible amalgamations (s. 116(1))
Industrial undertaking, ship or hotel company; banking company with a specified bank; public sector companies; certain erstwhile public sector companies
Loss and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company are deemed to be those of the amalgamated company for the tax year of amalgamation.
Carry forward limit (s. 116(12))
Amalgamation or reorganisation on or after 1 April 2025: carry forward ≤ 8 tax years after the year the loss was first computed for the original predecessor entity
Applies to the loss portion forming part of accumulated loss.
Demerger losses (s. 116(6))
Directly relatable to transferred undertakings → resulting company. Otherwise → apportioned in the ratio of assets retained by demerged company to assets transferred
Unabsorbed depreciation follows the same rule.

How to solve Business Reorganisation: Effect of Tribunal or Court Orders questions

Use this sequence for any question on tribunal or court orders in a business reorganisation.

  1. 1Identify the order: is it from a High Court, tribunal or an Adjudicating Authority under the IBC? Note its date and the tax years it applies to.
  2. 2Check whether a return was already furnished for those years. If none, section 314(1) does not apply.
  3. 3Identify the successor (all resulting companies) and compute the due date: end of the month of the order plus six months.
  4. 4Check the status of assessment on the date the modified return is filed: complete (order modifying total income) or pending (assess per the order).
  5. 5Confirm the modified return stays within the order. Apply the rates of the relevant tax year.
  6. 6If losses or unabsorbed depreciation are involved, test section 116: type of amalgamation, the three-year and three-fourths conditions, five-year holding, eight-year limit.
  7. 7For a demerger, split loss as directly relatable or apportion by assets.
  8. 8State the conclusion clearly, with the consequence of any default.

Quickest way: Four-line check for section 314 questions

When to use it: Use in short-answer or MCQ questions where you must give a deadline or the AO's action.

  1. Order type valid? Return already filed?
  2. Deadline = end of order month + 6 months.
  3. Assessment done → modify. Pending → assess as per order.
  4. Losses mentioned → apply section 116 conditions and the eight-year limit.

Common mistakes in Business Reorganisation: Effect of Tribunal or Court Orders

  • Counting six months from the date of the order itself.

    Students read it like an appeal limit.

    Fix: Count from the end of the month in which the order was issued. An order on 10 March gives 30 September.

  • Applying section 314 when no return was filed earlier.

    Students skip the condition in the opening words.

    Fix: Section 314(1) applies only where a return was already furnished for a tax year to which the order applies.

  • Saying the modified return can revise any item.

    Confusion with a revised return.

    Fix: It is limited to the order. It is filed by the successor in the prescribed form and manner.

  • Using current-year tax rates for the reopened year.

    Students assume the year of the order governs.

    Fix: Section 314(3) says tax is chargeable at the rates applicable to the relevant tax year.

  • Allowing amalgamation losses without testing conditions, or ignoring the eight-year limit.

    Students recall only that losses are carried forward.

    Fix: Test section 116(4) conditions and, for reorganisations on or after 1 April 2025, the eight-year limit in section 116(12).

  • Splitting demerger losses by assets even when directly relatable.

    Students remember the ratio but not the priority.

    Fix: Directly relatable losses go to the resulting company. Only the rest is apportioned.

Worked examples

Example 1

A High Court sanctions an amalgamation by an order issued on 18 August. The order applies to tax year 2025-26, for which Target Ltd had already filed its return. Find the last date for the successor to file the modified return, and state the AO's action if the assessment is (a) complete, (b) pending.

Show the solution
  1. A return was already furnished for a tax year to which the order applies, so section 314(1) applies.
  2. The order is from a High Court, so it is a valid order in respect of business reorganisation.
  3. The month of the order is August. Its end is 31 August.
  4. Six months from 31 August is 28 February (29 in a leap year).
  5. (a) If assessment or reassessment is complete when the modified return is filed, the AO passes an order modifying total income in accordance with the order and the modified return.
  6. (b) If it is pending, the AO assesses or reassesses total income as per the order, taking the modified return into account.
  7. Tax is at the rates applicable to tax year 2025-26.

Answer: The successor must file by the last day of February following (28 February, or 29 in a leap year). Complete assessment: AO modifies total income. Pending assessment: AO assesses as per the order. Rates of 2025-26 apply.

Example 2

Rao Steels Ltd, which owns an industrial undertaking, amalgamates with Sagar Alloys Ltd. Rao Steels has accumulated business loss of ₹40,00,000 and has run the business for four years. It held its fixed assets continuously for the two years before amalgamation. The amalgamation takes effect in 2026-27. Sagar Alloys sells half of the acquired fixed assets (by book value) after three years. Discuss the loss treatment.

Show the solution
  1. Amalgamation of a company owning an industrial undertaking with another company falls under section 116(1)(a).
  2. Loss and unabsorbed depreciation are deemed to be the amalgamated company's for the tax year of amalgamation, 2026-27.
  3. Test the amalgamating company: business for three or more years (four years: met); held at least three-fourths of book value of fixed assets of two years earlier (held continuously: met).
  4. Test the amalgamated company: it must hold at least three-fourths of the book value of acquired fixed assets for five years from the date of amalgamation.
  5. Selling half leaves 50%, below 75%, within five years. Condition 116(4)(b)(i) fails.
  6. Under section 116(5), any loss set off in earlier years in the hands of Sagar Alloys is deemed to be its income, chargeable to tax in the year of non-compliance (the year of sale).
  7. As the amalgamation is after 1 April 2025, the loss could in any case be carried forward only up to eight tax years after the year it was first computed for the original predecessor entity.

Answer: The loss is initially available to Sagar Alloys, but the sale breaches the five-year three-fourths holding condition. The loss set off so far is deemed income of Sagar Alloys in the year of the sale, and the unabsorbed balance cannot be carried forward.

Exam tips

  • Quote the exact limit: six months from the end of the month in which the order was issued. Show the date calculation.
  • Always write the two AO outcomes separately: assessment complete (modify) and pending (assess as per order).
  • In scenario MCQs, check if a return was filed earlier and whether the order is from an eligible authority.
  • For loss questions, list each section 116(4) condition and tick or cross it before concluding.
  • Cite section 314 for procedure and section 116 for losses. Do not mix the two.

Practice questions from Assessment of Companies

Business Reorganisation: Effect of Tribunal or Court Orders in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Business Reorganisation: Effect of Tribunal or Court Orders: frequently asked questions

What does section 314 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 deal with?

It deals with the effect of an order of a tribunal or court on business reorganisation. If a return was filed before the order, the successor files a modified return limited to the order. The AO then modifies or completes the assessment accordingly.

Who is the successor under section 314?

The successor means all resulting companies in a business reorganisation. It does not matter whether the company existed before the reorganisation.

Which orders are covered?

Orders of a High Court, a tribunal, or an Adjudicating Authority as defined in section 5(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

Are losses of an amalgamating company always carried forward?

No. Section 116 allows it only for specified amalgamations and only if the conditions in section 116(4) are met. For reorganisations on or after 1 April 2025, carry forward is also limited to eight tax years from the year the loss was first computed for the original predecessor entity.