Cost Accounting · Marginal Costing
Marginal vs Absorption Costing Profit Reconciliation
Updated 10 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Marginal costing charges only variable cost to products and treats all fixed cost as a period cost. Absorption costing also puts fixed production overhead into stock. When stock levels change, the two profits differ. Reconcile them by adjusting for the fixed overhead carried in closing stock minus that in opening stock.
Understand Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing Profit Reconciliation
Both methods use the same facts: the same sales, the same production and the same costs. They differ in one choice. Do you treat fixed production overhead as a cost of the product or as a cost of the period?
Marginal costing says fixed cost is a cost of the period. Only variable cost goes into the product. So stock is valued at variable production cost. All fixed cost of the year is charged against that year's contribution.
Absorption costing says every production cost belongs to the product. Stock is valued at variable cost plus a share of fixed production overhead. That share is charged to profit only when the units are sold. Fixed overhead sitting in closing stock is carried forward to the next period.
This is why profits differ. If you produce more than you sell, stock rises. Absorption costing parks some fixed overhead in that stock, so its profit is higher. If you sell more than you produce, stock falls. Old fixed overhead is released from opening stock, so absorption profit is lower. If opening and closing stock are equal in units (and the fixed overhead rate is the same), the profits are equal.
Only production overhead goes into stock under absorption costing. Selling, distribution and administration costs are period costs under both methods. The difference between the two profits is always about fixed production overhead in stock, nothing else.
Key rules to remember
- Marginal costing income statement
- Sales − Variable cost of sales − Variable selling cost = Contribution; Contribution − Total fixed costs = Profit
- Variable cost of sales = Opening stock + Variable production cost − Closing stock, all at variable cost. All fixed costs, including production, selling and administration, are charged in full.
- Absorption costing income statement
- Sales − Cost of goods sold ± Under/over absorption − Selling, distribution and administration costs = Profit
- Cost of goods sold = Opening stock + Production cost (variable + absorbed fixed) − Closing stock, at full production cost.
- Fixed overhead absorption rate
- Rate per unit = Budgeted fixed production overhead ÷ Budgeted (normal) production units
- Use units of production, not sales. Under/over absorption = Actual fixed overhead − Absorbed overhead (production units × rate).
- Stock valuation rule
- Marginal stock value per unit = Variable production cost; Absorption stock value per unit = Variable production cost + Fixed overhead rate
- Non-production costs are excluded from stock under both methods.
- Profit difference
- Absorption profit − Marginal profit = Fixed overhead in closing stock − Fixed overhead in opening stock
- If the rate is the same in both periods, this equals (Closing stock units − Opening stock units) × Fixed overhead rate per unit. If the rate differs, value each stock separately.
- Direction of the difference
- Stock rises: absorption profit higher. Stock falls: absorption profit lower. Stock unchanged in units at the same rate: profits equal.
- Use this as a quick check on the sign of your answer.
How to solve Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing Profit Reconciliation questions
Use the same layout every time. Do the unit working first, because most errors begin with wrong stock or production units.
- 1Write the unit working: Opening stock + Production − Sales = Closing stock. Check it ties with the figures given.
- 2Compute the fixed overhead absorption rate from budgeted fixed production overhead and budgeted production units. Then compute the variable and full production cost per unit.
- 3Value opening and closing stock twice: at variable cost for marginal costing, and at variable cost plus the fixed rate for absorption costing.
- 4Prepare the marginal costing statement. Find variable cost of sales, deduct variable selling cost to get contribution, then deduct all fixed costs to get profit.
- 5Prepare the absorption costing statement. Find cost of goods sold at full cost, adjust for under or over absorption, then deduct all selling and administration costs.
- 6Reconcile. Start with marginal profit, add the fixed overhead in closing stock, deduct the fixed overhead in opening stock. The result must equal absorption profit.
- 7State the reason in one line: stock increased or decreased, so absorption profit is higher or lower by a stated amount.
Quickest way: Reconcile first, then verify with one statement
When to use it: Use when the question asks for both profits and a reconciliation and time is short, or when you want a check on your answer.
- Prepare the marginal costing statement in full. It is shorter and has fewer adjustments.
- Compute fixed overhead in opening and closing stock: units × fixed overhead rate for each.
- Get absorption profit as Marginal profit + Closing stock fixed overhead − Opening stock fixed overhead.
- Prepare the absorption statement only if the question asks for it, and check that it matches the figure from step 3.
- If the figures do not match, recheck the units of production used for the rate and the under or over absorption entry.
Common mistakes in Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing Profit Reconciliation
Including fixed production overhead in stock under marginal costing
Students value stock once and use the same figure in both statements.
Fix: Keep two stock columns. Marginal stock carries only variable production cost. Absorption stock carries variable cost plus fixed overhead.
Including selling or administration costs in stock valuation
Students treat every fixed cost like production overhead.
Fix: Only production overhead goes into stock. Selling, distribution and administration costs are charged to the period under both methods.
Calculating the absorption rate on sales units
The rate is confused with a break-even style calculation.
Fix: Divide budgeted fixed production overhead by budgeted production units. Absorption happens when goods are produced.
Forgetting under or over absorption in the absorption statement
Actual production differs from budget, but students use the rate and stop.
Fix: Compare actual fixed overhead with production units × rate. Add under absorption as a cost, deduct over absorption. Do this whenever actual production differs from the normal level.
Reversing the sign in the reconciliation
Students memorise 'add closing, deduct opening' without knowing the starting point.
Fix: The formula starts from marginal profit. Add closing stock fixed overhead, deduct opening stock fixed overhead. Check against the rule that rising stock gives higher absorption profit.
Using change in units × rate when the rate changed between years
The shortcut works only when the rate is the same in both periods.
Fix: If the rate differs, compute opening stock fixed overhead at last year's rate and closing stock at this year's rate, then take the difference.
Worked examples
Example 1
Ranchi Plastics makes one product. Selling price is ₹50 per unit. Variable production cost is ₹20 per unit. Variable selling cost is ₹5 per unit sold. Fixed production overhead is ₹1,20,000 per year, absorbed on budgeted production of 12,000 units. Fixed selling and administration cost is ₹60,000. In Year 1 there is no opening stock. Production is 12,000 units and sales are 10,000 units. Prepare income statements under marginal and absorption costing and reconcile the profits.
Show the solution
- Units: Opening 0 + Production 12,000 − Sales 10,000 = Closing stock 2,000 units.
- Fixed overhead rate = ₹1,20,000 ÷ 12,000 = ₹10 per unit. Full production cost = ₹20 + ₹10 = ₹30 per unit. Actual production equals budget, so there is no under or over absorption.
- Marginal costing: Sales 10,000 × ₹50 = ₹5,00,000. Variable production cost 12,000 × ₹20 = ₹2,40,000. Less closing stock 2,000 × ₹20 = ₹40,000. Variable cost of sales = ₹2,00,000.
- Variable selling cost = 10,000 × ₹5 = ₹50,000. Contribution = ₹5,00,000 − ₹2,00,000 − ₹50,000 = ₹2,50,000.
- Fixed costs = ₹1,20,000 + ₹60,000 = ₹1,80,000. Marginal costing profit = ₹2,50,000 − ₹1,80,000 = ₹70,000.
- Absorption costing: Production cost 12,000 × ₹30 = ₹3,60,000. Less closing stock 2,000 × ₹30 = ₹60,000. Cost of goods sold = ₹3,00,000. Gross profit = ₹5,00,000 − ₹3,00,000 = ₹2,00,000.
- Less variable selling ₹50,000 and fixed selling and administration ₹60,000 = ₹1,10,000. Absorption costing profit = ₹2,00,000 − ₹1,10,000 = ₹90,000.
- Reconciliation: Marginal profit ₹70,000 + Fixed overhead in closing stock (2,000 × ₹10 = ₹20,000) − Fixed overhead in opening stock ₹0 = ₹90,000, which equals absorption profit.
Answer: Marginal costing profit is ₹70,000 and absorption costing profit is ₹90,000. Absorption profit is ₹20,000 higher because stock rose by 2,000 units, each carrying ₹10 of fixed production overhead.
Example 2
Continue with Ranchi Plastics for Year 2. All costs, the selling price and the ₹10 fixed overhead rate are unchanged. Opening stock is 2,000 units. Production is 9,000 units and sales are 11,000 units. Actual fixed production overhead is ₹1,20,000. Prepare both statements and reconcile the profits.
Show the solution
- Units: Opening 2,000 + Production 9,000 − Sales 11,000 = Closing stock 0.
- Opening stock value: marginal 2,000 × ₹20 = ₹40,000. Absorption 2,000 × ₹30 = ₹60,000. Closing stock is nil in both.
- Marginal costing: Sales 11,000 × ₹50 = ₹5,50,000. Variable cost of sales = ₹40,000 + (9,000 × ₹20 = ₹1,80,000) − 0 = ₹2,20,000. Variable selling = 11,000 × ₹5 = ₹55,000.
- Contribution = ₹5,50,000 − ₹2,20,000 − ₹55,000 = ₹2,75,000. Fixed costs = ₹1,80,000. Marginal costing profit = ₹95,000.
- Absorption costing: Cost of goods sold = ₹60,000 + (9,000 × ₹30 = ₹2,70,000) − 0 = ₹3,30,000.
- Fixed overhead absorbed = 9,000 × ₹10 = ₹90,000. Actual = ₹1,20,000. Under absorption = ₹30,000, charged as an extra cost.
- Gross profit = ₹5,50,000 − ₹3,30,000 − ₹30,000 = ₹1,90,000. Less variable selling ₹55,000 and fixed selling and administration ₹60,000 = ₹1,15,000. Absorption costing profit = ₹75,000.
- Reconciliation: Marginal profit ₹95,000 + Closing stock fixed overhead ₹0 − Opening stock fixed overhead (2,000 × ₹10 = ₹20,000) = ₹75,000, which equals absorption profit.
Answer: Marginal costing profit is ₹95,000 and absorption costing profit is ₹75,000. Absorption profit is ₹20,000 lower because stock fell by 2,000 units, releasing ₹20,000 of last year's fixed overhead into this year's cost.
Exam tips
- Show the unit working and the rate calculation at the top. Step marks are given for them even if a later figure is wrong.
- Use a two-column layout or two separate statements with the same line items so the examiner can see where the methods differ.
- Always end with the reconciliation and one sentence of explanation: stock rose or fell by so many units at ₹ per unit. ICMAI expects interpretation, not just numbers.
- In MCQs, test the direction first. Production above sales means absorption profit is higher. Then compute the amount as stock change × fixed overhead rate and eliminate options that fail either check.
- Read whether the question gives the fixed overhead rate or budgeted figures. If actual production differs from budget, include under or over absorption in the absorption statement.
Practice questions from Marginal Costing
- Gupta Industries makes components X and Y using the same machine, which is the limiting factor with 6,000 hours available. X: selling price …
- Aarav Plastics sells a product at Rs 80 per unit. Variable cost is Rs 52 per unit and fixed cost is Rs 2,80,000 per year. If sales are 12,00…
- A firm has spare capacity and is evaluating a special order priced below its normal selling price but above variable cost. According to marg…
- Sri Lakshmi Foods sells a snack at ₹50 per unit with variable cost of ₹30 per unit. Fixed costs are ₹2,40,000 per annum. What is the break-e…
- Which statement about the P/V ratio is correct, assuming selling price and variable cost per unit are constant?
Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing Profit Reconciliation in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing Profit Reconciliation: frequently asked questions
Why does profit differ under marginal and absorption costing?
The methods treat fixed production overhead differently. Marginal costing charges all of it to the period. Absorption costing includes it in stock value, so part of it moves to the next period when stock rises. Profits differ only when opening and closing stock values carry different amounts of fixed overhead.
When are marginal and absorption costing profits equal?
They are equal when the fixed production overhead in opening stock equals that in closing stock. With the same absorption rate in both periods, that means opening and closing stock are equal in units. Production and sales are then equal.
How do I prepare a marginal costing income statement?
Start with sales. Deduct variable cost of sales, which is opening stock plus variable production cost minus closing stock at variable cost. Deduct variable selling cost to get contribution. Then deduct all fixed costs to reach profit.
Do selling and administration costs go into stock under absorption costing?
No. Only production costs are included in stock valuation. Selling, distribution and administration costs are treated as period costs under both methods.