Economic, Commercial and Intellectual Property Laws · Law relating to Special Economic Zones
Establishment of SEZ and Approval Procedure under the SEZ Act
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
A Special Economic Zone is set up when a developer (a person or State Government) makes a proposal, the Board of Approval approves it, the Central Government grants a letter of approval, and the Central Government then notifies the identified area. Units later apply to the Development Commissioner, and the Approval Committee decides.
Understand Establishment of SEZ and Approval Procedure
An SEZ is a specially notified area for manufacture of goods, rendering of services, or both, or a Free Trade and Warehousing Zone. Section 3(1) says it can be established jointly or severally by the Central Government, a State Government or any person.
The law works in two layers. First, the zone is created: someone proposes it, the Board approves it, the Central Government grants a letter of approval to the Developer, and the area is notified. Second, units are set up inside the notified zone: each unit applies to the Development Commissioner and the Approval Committee decides.
There are three ways a proposal can start. A person may go to the State Government (Section 3(2)); a person may go directly to the Board (Section 3(3)); or a State Government may forward its own proposal directly to the Board (Section 3(4)). The Central Government can also set up and notify a zone on its own, after consulting the State Government and identifying the area, without referring the proposal to the Board.
The Board does not simply say yes or no. It can approve with terms and conditions, modify, or reject (Section 3(7)). Each outcome has a set communication path under Section 3(9). Only after approval does the Central Government grant the letter of approval under Section 3(10), and only after that does the Developer submit exact particulars for notification under Section 4(1).
Others can join in. A person or State Government that wants to provide infrastructure or undertake authorised operations enters an agreement with the Developer, gets Board approval and a letter of approval, and becomes a Co-Developer (Section 3(11) and (12)).
Key rules to remember
- Who may establish an SEZ
- Central Government / State Government / any person, jointly or severally (Section 3(1))
- Purpose: manufacture of goods, rendering services, both, or a Free Trade and Warehousing Zone.
- Three proposal routes
- Person → State Government (s.3(2)); Person → Board directly (s.3(3)); State Government → Board (s.3(4))
- Under the direct route in s.3(3), the Board may approve and the person must then obtain State Government concurrence within the prescribed period.
- Suo motu route
- Central Government may, after consulting the State Government and identifying the area, set up and notify an SEZ without referring to the Board (proviso to s.3(4))
- All three conditions apply together: consultation, no Board reference, area identified.
- Role of State Government on a s.3(2) proposal
- State Government may forward the proposal with its recommendations to the Board within the prescribed period (s.3(6))
- The word is 'may'. Board then acts under s.3(7).
- Board's powers
- Approve with conditions / modify / reject (s.3(7))
- Central Government may prescribe minimum land area and conditions, and Developer's terms, obligations and entitlements (s.3(8)). Different minimum areas may be prescribed for classes of SEZs.
- Board's communication
- Approve without modification → tell Central Government; approve with modifications → tell person/State, and once accepted tell Central Government; reject → record reasons, tell Central Government, which informs the person/State (s.3(9))
- Rejection needs recorded reasons.
- Letter of approval to Developer
- Central Government grants within prescribed time, on terms approved by Board (s.3(10))
- More than one Developer is allowed where one lacks the prescribed minimum contiguous land; each is a Developer for the land in its possession.
- Notification
- After letter of approval, Developer submits exact particulars of the area; Central Government notifies if s.3(8) and other prescribed requirements are met (s.4(1))
- Additional area may be notified later. Existing SEZs are deemed notified and established.
- Setting up a unit
- Proposal → Development Commissioner → Approval Committee → letter of approval by Development Commissioner (s.15(1), (2), (3), (9))
- Appeal against the Approval Committee's order lies to the Board (s.15(4)).
How to solve Establishment of SEZ and Approval Procedure questions
Most questions ask you to trace a process or advise a person. Use a fixed sequence so you cover every stage and cite the right sub-section.
- 1Identify what is being set up: the zone itself (Section 3 and 4) or a unit inside a notified zone (Section 15).
- 2Identify who is proposing: a person, a State Government, or the Central Government acting on its own. This decides the route.
- 3State the route and the section: person to State Government (s.3(2)), person direct to Board (s.3(3)), State to Board (s.3(4)), or suo motu by Centre.
- 4Describe the Board's decision under s.3(7) and the communication under s.3(9), including the effect of modification or rejection.
- 5State the letter of approval under s.3(10), then the Developer's submission of exact particulars and notification under s.4(1). For units, state the Development Commissioner, Approval Committee, hearing and appeal steps.
- 6Check special points in the facts: minimum land area, more than one Developer, Co-Developer, existing zone or unit.
- 7Close with a clear conclusion that answers the exact question asked.
Quickest way: Zone ladder and unit ladder
When to use it: Use when you have a few minutes and the question asks for the procedure or the next step.
- Write the zone ladder: Proposal → (State recommendation) → Board → Central Government letter of approval → Developer's particulars → Notification.
- Write the unit ladder: Proposal → Development Commissioner → Approval Committee → Letter of approval by Development Commissioner → appeal to Board if aggrieved.
- Mark the section next to each rung: s.3(2)-(4), s.3(7), s.3(10), s.4(1); s.15(1), (2), (3), (9), (4).
- Circle the special rule the facts test: direct Board route, suo motu, multiple Developers, Co-Developer or hearing before rejection.
- Write one line of provision, one of application, one of conclusion.
Common mistakes in Establishment of SEZ and Approval Procedure
Saying the Board grants the letter of approval.
Students merge the Board's approval with the grant that follows it.
Fix: The Board approves; the Central Government grants the letter of approval under s.3(10), on terms approved by the Board.
Treating State Government recommendation as compulsory for every proposal.
Students remember s.3(2) and forget s.3(3) and s.3(4).
Fix: A person may apply directly to the Board under s.3(3). The Board may approve, and the person then obtains State concurrence within the prescribed period.
Stating a fixed minimum land area in hectares or acres.
Students recall figures from rules or notes and attribute them to the Act.
Fix: The Act only empowers the Central Government to prescribe minimum area and conditions (s.3(8)), and different areas for classes of SEZs. Say so, and give figures only if you are certain of the Rules.
Confusing Developer, Co-Developer and unit entrepreneur.
All three invest in the zone.
Fix: Developer holds the letter of approval for the zone. Co-Developer provides infrastructure or authorised operations under agreement with the Developer (s.3(11), (12)). A unit carries on authorised operations under a Development Commissioner's letter of approval (s.15(9)).
Sending a unit proposal to the Board or the Approval Committee first.
Students mix the zone and unit procedures.
Fix: A unit proposal goes to the Development Commissioner, who submits it to the Approval Committee (s.15(1), (2)).
Forgetting natural justice and appeal for units.
Students stop at approval.
Fix: Before modifying or rejecting, the Approval Committee must give a reasonable hearing and record reasons (s.15(3) proviso). An aggrieved person may appeal to the Board within the prescribed time (s.15(4)); late appeals need sufficient cause (s.15(5) proviso).
Worked examples
Example 1
Sunrise Infra Ltd, a company, has identified land in Gujarat and wants to set up an SEZ for IT services. Explain the procedure it must follow under the SEZ Act, 2005, up to notification of the zone.
Show the solution
- Provision: under s.3(1), any person may establish an SEZ for manufacture, services or both. Under s.3(2) it makes a proposal to the State Government after identifying the area, in the prescribed form and manner (s.3(5)).
- The State Government may forward the proposal with its recommendations to the Board within the prescribed period (s.3(6)). Alternatively, under s.3(3), Sunrise may apply directly to the Board; if the Board approves, Sunrise must obtain State Government concurrence within the prescribed period.
- The Board may approve with conditions, modify or reject (s.3(7)), subject to the minimum area and conditions the Central Government prescribes (s.3(8)). If it approves with modifications, Sunrise must accept them before approval goes to the Central Government (s.3(9)(b)). If it rejects, it records reasons.
- On approval, the Central Government grants Sunrise a letter of approval within the prescribed time, on the terms the Board approved (s.3(10)).
- Sunrise then submits exact particulars of the identified area to the Central Government, which may notify it as an SEZ once s.3(8) and other prescribed requirements are met (s.4(1)).
- The Board may then authorise Sunrise to undertake the operations the Central Government allows (s.4(2)).
Answer: Sunrise proposes to the State Government (or directly to the Board), the Board approves, the Central Government grants a letter of approval, and after Sunrise submits exact particulars the Central Government notifies the area as an SEZ under s.4(1).
Example 2
Meera Exports Pvt Ltd applied to set up a manufacturing unit in a notified SEZ. The Approval Committee rejected the proposal without hearing the company. Advise Meera.
Show the solution
- Provision: under s.15(1), a person intending to set up a unit submits a proposal to the Development Commissioner, who submits it to the Approval Committee (s.15(2)).
- The Approval Committee may approve, approve with modifications, or reject (s.15(3)). The proviso requires that for modification or rejection it must afford a reasonable opportunity of being heard and record reasons.
- Application: the committee rejected without hearing Meera. This breaches the proviso to s.15(3).
- Remedy: Meera, being a person aggrieved by an order under s.15(3), may appeal to the Board within the prescribed time (s.15(4)). The appeal must be in the prescribed form with a copy of the order and prescribed fees (s.15(6)). If late, the Board may admit it on sufficient cause (s.15(5) proviso). The appellant must be heard before disposal (s.15(7) proviso).
- If the proposal is finally approved, the Development Commissioner grants a letter of approval stating each authorised operation (s.15(9)).
Answer: The rejection is procedurally defective for want of a hearing. Meera should appeal to the Board within the prescribed time under s.15(4), attaching the order and fees.
Exam tips
- Draw the zone ladder and unit ladder at the start of a procedure answer. It earns structure marks and keeps you from mixing the two.
- Cite sub-sections: s.3(2), s.3(3), s.3(4), s.3(10) and s.4(1) are the ones examiners expect.
- For minimum area, say the Central Government prescribes it (s.3(8)) and that it can differ by class of SEZ. Avoid quoting numbers unless sure.
- In case-based questions, spot the trigger: direct-to-Board route, multiple Developers, Co-Developer, or missing hearing for a unit.
- End every answer with a one-line conclusion that names the authority and the next step.
Practice questions from Law relating to Special Economic Zones
- The Board under the SEZ Act, 2005 wishes to reduce its workload by letting officers on the ground exercise some of its functions for effecti…
- Meridian Infra Ltd. wants approval for a proposed Special Economic Zone near Pune and also wants its proposal to be modified before approval…
- Meera Textiles Ltd. proposes a processing activity in an SEZ, and there is doubt whether the activity counts as 'manufacture'. Under the SEZ…
- Aarav Infra Ltd. wants to set up a multi-product SEZ and a question arises as to who decides whether the proposal for establishing the SEZ i…
- The Central Government proposes a notification under section 49(1) modifying a Central Act in its application to all SEZs. Which statement i…
Establishment of SEZ and Approval Procedure in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Establishment of SEZ and Approval Procedure: frequently asked questions
Who grants the letter of approval to an SEZ Developer?
The Central Government grants it under Section 3(10), on the terms, obligations and entitlements approved by the Board. This happens after the Board communicates its approval to the Central Government.
Can a person apply directly to the Board of Approval for an SEZ?
Yes. Section 3(3) allows a person to make a proposal directly to the Board. If the Board approves, the person must obtain the State Government's concurrence within the prescribed period.
Can there be more than one Developer in an SEZ?
Yes. Under the proviso to Section 3(10), the Central Government may approve more than one Developer where one Developer lacks the prescribed minimum contiguous land. Each is a Developer for the land in its possession.
How does a company set up a unit in an SEZ?
It submits a proposal to the Development Commissioner, who sends it to the Approval Committee. After approval, the Development Commissioner grants a letter of approval stating the authorised operations (Section 15).
What can I do if the Approval Committee rejects my unit proposal?
You can appeal to the Board within the prescribed time under Section 15(4). The Committee must have heard you and recorded reasons before rejecting. A late appeal can be admitted if you show sufficient cause.