Skip to content

Tax Laws and Practice · Income under the Head Salary

Profits in Lieu of Salary and Accumulated Balances

Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Profits in lieu of salary are payments linked to a job that are not ordinary salary, such as termination compensation or payments before joining or after leaving. They are taxed as salary unless exempt. A recognised provident fund balance is excluded from total income only if the conditions in Schedule XI, Part A, paragraph 8 are met.

Understand Profits in Lieu of Salary and Accumulated Balances

Salary is not only the monthly pay. The law also taxes money that comes to you because of your job, even when it is not a normal wage. These receipts are called profits in lieu of salary. They are taxed under the head Salaries.

Typical cases are compensation paid when your employment ends or when its terms are changed, a payment due from a former employer, and a payment received from an employer before you join or after you leave. The test is the link with employment. If the payment exists because of the employer-employee relationship, think of it as salary-type income. Then check whether a specific exemption takes it out of tax. Retrenchment compensation, gratuity and approved voluntary retirement payments have their own exemption rules in your study material.

The second half of the topic is the accumulated balance of a provident fund. This is the balance an employee can claim on the day he ceases to be an employee. Schedule XI, Part A of the Income-tax Act, 2025 covers recognised provident funds. Recognition is granted by the approving authority (Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner), who can also withdraw it.

The balance paid out is excluded from your total income in four situations: continuous service of five years or more; service ended by ill-health, contraction or closure of the employer's business, or another cause beyond your control; transfer to a recognised fund of the new employer; or transfer of the entire balance to a notified pension scheme under section 124. If none applies, the balance is taxed under paragraphs 9 and 10.

Key rules to remember

Profits in lieu of salary: test
Payment because of employment (before, during, on ending or on changing terms) − specific exemption = taxable under Salaries
Always check whether a separate exemption applies, for example gratuity, retrenchment compensation or approved voluntary retirement payment. Taxable only to the extent not exempt.
Exclusion of RPF accumulated balance (Sch. XI Pt A, para 8(1))
Excluded if: (a) continuous service ≥ 5 years; or (b) service ended by ill-health / contraction or closure of business / other cause beyond employee's control; or (c) transferred to new employer's recognised PF (to the extent transferred); or (d) entire balance moved to a notified pension scheme under section 124
Clauses (a) and (b) are alternatives. Clause (c) excludes only the amount actually transferred.
Service period when balance is transferred (para 8(2))
Continuous service = service with present employer + service with earlier employers whose balances were transferred in
Use this when the balance includes amounts transferred from previous recognised funds.
Tax when exclusion fails (para 9)
Extra tax = Σ (tax for each year as if the fund were not recognised) − Σ (tax actually paid for those years)
The extra tax is payable in the tax year in which the balance becomes payable, in addition to other tax.
TDS on such balance (para 10)
Trustees or the authorised person deduct the para 9 amount at payment; Chapter XIX-B applies as if the balance were salary
Applies only where para 9 applies.
Interest above the notified rate (para 6)
Interest credited at a rate above the Central Government notified rate = deemed received by employee and taxable in that tax year
After the 2026 amendment, para 6 deals only with excess interest. The old 12% employer-contribution test is no longer in its text.
Employee's own contribution (para 7)
Deduction as determined under section 123
Relief is for the employee's contribution in the tax year, not for the balance paid out.

How to solve Profits in Lieu of Salary and Accumulated Balances questions

Use the same sequence for any question on profits in lieu of salary or on a provident fund balance.

  1. 1Identify the receipt: is it compensation, a payment before joining or after leaving, or a fund payout? Note who pays and why.
  2. 2For a non-fund payment, ask if it arises from employment or its termination or change in terms. If yes, treat it as profit in lieu of salary.
  3. 3Check for a specific exemption (gratuity, retrenchment compensation, approved voluntary retirement). Tax only the non-exempt part.
  4. 4For a provident fund, first confirm the fund is recognised. The para 8 rules are for recognised funds only.
  5. 5Test para 8 in order: five years of continuous service (add earlier service whose balance was transferred in), then ill-health or business closure or other cause beyond control, then transfer to a new recognised fund, then transfer to a notified pension scheme.
  6. 6If any test is met, state that the balance is excluded to that extent. If none is met, apply para 9 and mention TDS under para 10.
  7. 7Check for excess interest under para 6 and for the employee's own contribution deduction under para 7 if the facts mention them.
  8. 8Write the conclusion clearly: amount taxable, head of income and reason.

Quickest way: Four-gate check for the PF balance

When to use it: Use for short-answer or case-study questions that give service period, reason for leaving and what happened to the balance.

  1. Gate 1: service of 5 years or more, adding transferred service? If yes, excluded.
  2. Gate 2: ended by ill-health, business contraction or closure, or another cause beyond control? If yes, excluded.
  3. Gate 3: balance moved to the new employer's recognised fund? Excluded to the extent transferred.
  4. Gate 4: entire balance moved to a notified pension scheme under section 124? Excluded.
  5. If all four gates fail, the balance is taxable under para 9 with TDS under para 10. For other payments, ask only: linked to employment? Exempt by a specific rule? Then tax the rest as salary.

Common mistakes in Profits in Lieu of Salary and Accumulated Balances

  • Treating every termination payment as exempt.

    Students remember that retrenchment compensation and gratuity are exempt and extend this to all payments.

    Fix: Treat compensation as taxable profit in lieu of salary by default. Exempt only the part that a specific provision covers.

  • Applying the five-year rule to an unrecognised fund.

    Students recall the rule and forget that Schedule XI Part A applies to recognised funds.

    Fix: State first whether the fund is recognised. Then apply para 8.

  • Ignoring earlier service when the balance was transferred.

    Students count only service with the present employer.

    Fix: Under para 8(2), add service with previous employers whose balances were transferred into the account.

  • Taxing the whole balance in the year of payment at the normal rate.

    Students overlook the method in para 9.

    Fix: Recompute tax for each earlier year as if the fund were not recognised, deduct the tax already paid, and charge the difference.

  • Excluding the full balance when only part is transferred to the new employer's fund.

    Students read the transfer rule as all or nothing.

    Fix: For a transfer to a new recognised fund, only the amount actually transferred is excluded. For the pension scheme route, the entire balance must be transferred.

  • Forgetting that payments before joining or after leaving can be salary-type income.

    Students link salary only to the period of service.

    Fix: Look at the reason for the payment, not the date. Payments due or received from an employer or former employer because of the employment fall in this topic.

Worked examples

Example 1

Ravi Menon's employment with Kaveri Textiles Ltd was ended before the end of his contract. The company paid him ₹3,00,000 as compensation for termination. No specific exemption applies to this sum. Discuss the tax treatment.

Show the solution
  1. Provision: compensation due or received from an employer on termination of employment is a profit in lieu of salary and is taxed under the head Salaries.
  2. Facts: the payment is made by the employer, and only because the contract was ended early. It is clearly connected with employment.
  3. Exemption check: the facts say that no specific exemption applies. So no part is excluded.
  4. Conclusion on amount: the whole ₹3,00,000 is taxable.

Answer: The full ₹3,00,000 is taxable as profit in lieu of salary under the head Salaries, as no exemption applies.

Example 2

Four employees receive the accumulated balance from a recognised provident fund. (A) Anil resigns after 6 years of continuous service. (B) Bina has 3 years of service, and her service ends because the employer closes the business. (C) Chetan has 3 years of service, joins another employer and has the whole balance transferred to that employer's recognised fund. (D) Deepa has 2 years of service, resigns to take a better job and withdraws the balance without any transfer. State the tax treatment of each.

Show the solution
  1. Anil: continuous service is 5 years or more, so para 8(1)(a) applies. The balance is excluded from total income.
  2. Bina: service is under 5 years, but it ended due to closure of the employer's business, which para 8(1)(b)(ii) covers. The balance is excluded.
  3. Chetan: service is under 5 years and the reason is not covered. But he joined another employer and the balance is transferred to the new recognised fund, so para 8(1)(c) applies. The amount transferred is excluded. Because the whole balance is transferred, all of it is excluded.
  4. Deepa: service is under 5 years, the cause is a voluntary resignation, and nothing is transferred. None of the para 8 conditions is met.
  5. So Deepa's balance is included in her total income through para 9. The Assessing Officer finds the tax for each year as if the fund were not recognised, subtracts the tax already paid, and the difference is payable in the year the balance becomes payable. The trustees deduct this at payment under para 10.

Answer: Anil, Bina and Chetan: the balance is excluded from total income. Deepa: the balance is taxable under para 9, with tax deducted at source under para 10.

Exam tips

  • Write answers in the ICSI pattern: the provision, application to the facts, then a clear conclusion. Cite Schedule XI, Part A, paragraph 8, 9 or 10 where it applies.
  • In fund questions, underline the service period, the reason for leaving and what happened to the balance. These three facts decide the answer.
  • State whether the fund is recognised before applying the para 8 rules. This one line earns an easy mark.
  • For compensation questions, say that it is taxable as profit in lieu of salary and then name any exemption that reduces it.
  • Learn the para 9 method in words. A theory question often asks you to explain how the tax on a non-excluded balance is worked out.

Practice questions from Income under the Head Salary

Profits in Lieu of Salary and Accumulated Balances in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Profits in Lieu of Salary and Accumulated Balances: frequently asked questions

What does profits in lieu of salary mean?

It means payments connected with employment that are not ordinary salary, such as compensation on termination or change in terms, or payments from an employer before joining or after leaving. They are taxed under the head Salaries. Any part covered by a specific exemption is left out.

Is the accumulated balance of a recognised provident fund taxable?

Not if one of the conditions in Schedule XI, Part A, paragraph 8 is met. These are five years of continuous service, termination by ill-health or business closure or another cause beyond your control, transfer to a new employer's recognised fund, or transfer to a notified pension scheme. If none is met, paragraph 9 applies.

How is tax on the balance worked out if the exclusion does not apply?

The Assessing Officer calculates the tax for each year concerned as if the fund had not been recognised. The excess over the tax actually paid for those years is payable in the year the balance becomes payable. The trustees deduct it at the time of payment.

Does earlier service count towards the five-year rule?

Yes, where the balance includes amounts transferred from a previous employer's recognised fund. Paragraph 8(2) adds the service with those previous employers to the continuous service period.

Who can grant or withdraw recognition of a provident fund?

The approving authority can do both. It means the Principal Chief Commissioner, Chief Commissioner, Principal Commissioner or Commissioner. An employer who objects to a refusal or withdrawal can appeal to the Board within sixty days of the order.