Skip to content

Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · General Principles of Drafting

Language, Style and Interpretation in Legal Drafting

Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Legal drafting language means choosing clear, precise, consistent words so a document has only one reasonable meaning. You use plain language, define key terms once, use shall, may and must carefully, punctuate with care, and know the rules courts use to interpret the text if a dispute arises.

Understand Language, Style and Interpretation in Drafting

A legal document is written for a reader who may be hostile. That reader may be the other party, a court or a tribunal. So the aim is not to sound learned. The aim is to leave no room for a second meaning.

Three qualities matter most: clarity, precision and consistency. Clarity means short sentences and ordinary words. Precision means the exact person, act, amount and date are named. Consistency means the same word always carries the same meaning. If you say "Purchaser" in clause 1, do not say "Buyer" in clause 7.

Definitions fix the meaning of a term once, so you need not repeat it. A recital is different. It is a statement of background facts or intent, usually under "WHEREAS", and it explains why the parties are contracting. A definition clause gives meaning and operates throughout. A recital explains context and does not normally create obligations. Courts look at recitals mainly when an operative clause is ambiguous.

Words of obligation need care. Shall usually imposes a duty. May gives a discretion or permission. Must states a strong requirement. Shall not is a prohibition. Courts may read "shall" as directory in some statutes, so in private documents state the consequence of breach if it matters. Punctuation also changes meaning. A misplaced comma can change who is bound or what a condition covers.

If words still turn out unclear, courts apply rules of interpretation. The main ones: read the document as a whole; give words their ordinary, natural meaning; read the intention of the parties from the document itself; prefer a reading that makes the document work rather than fail; read specific words over general ones; and in a doubtful case, the clause is read against the party who drafted it (contra proferentem). Your job as a drafter is to write so these rules are never needed.

Key rules to remember

Literal rule
Ordinary, natural meaning of words, unless absurd or contrary to the document
The starting point. Apply it first.
Whole-document (harmonious) rule
Read the document as a whole; no clause is to be treated as meaningless
Clauses are reconciled with each other, not read in isolation.
Ejusdem generis
General words after specific items are limited to the same kind (class)
Example: "cars, buses, trucks and other vehicles" covers road vehicles, not aircraft.
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
Express mention of one thing excludes others of the same kind
Use with caution; it is an aid, not an always-true rule.
Noscitur a sociis
A word is known by the company it keeps
Meaning of a doubtful word is drawn from the words around it.
Contra proferentem
Ambiguity is resolved against the party who drafted or relies on the clause
Applied only when real ambiguity remains after other rules.
Specific over general
Specific clause prevails over a general clause in case of conflict
Also: handwritten or typed additions generally prevail over printed standard terms.
Shall / may / must
shall = duty; may = discretion; must = strong requirement; shall not = prohibition
Use one word for one idea throughout the document.
Recital vs definition
Recital = background and intent; Definition = fixed meaning of a term
Recitals do not normally create rights; operative clauses do.

How to solve Language, Style and Interpretation in Drafting questions

Questions here ask you to explain a drafting principle, correct a clause, or apply an interpretation rule to facts. Use this order.

  1. 1Read the question and mark what is asked: explain, distinguish, redraft, or interpret.
  2. 2State the relevant principle in one or two lines, naming the rule or term.
  3. 3Explain why it matters: what ambiguity or dispute the rule prevents or solves.
  4. 4Apply it to the clause or facts given, quoting the key words from the question.
  5. 5If redrafting, rewrite the clause with defined terms, one meaning per word and a clear subject, duty and time.
  6. 6Note any competing rule or exception, such as specific over general, and say which prevails.
  7. 7Conclude in one sentence: the meaning adopted or the corrected clause.

Quickest way: Rule, apply, conclude

When to use it: When time is short and the question gives a clause and asks what it means or how to fix it.

  1. Underline the doubtful word or phrase.
  2. Ask: is it an ambiguity, an undefined term, a shall/may issue, or a punctuation issue?
  3. Name the matching rule (for example ejusdem generis for a general tail word).
  4. Write the meaning that follows, in one or two sentences.
  5. Add a one-line redraft that removes the doubt.

Common mistakes in Language, Style and Interpretation in Drafting

  • Treating recitals as binding operative terms

    Both appear at the start and use formal language.

    Fix: Say that recitals state background and intent and help only if an operative clause is ambiguous. Obligations belong in operative clauses.

  • Using shall, may and must interchangeably

    Students think they all sound formal and mean the same.

    Fix: Use shall for duty, may for discretion, shall not for prohibition. Keep one word for one idea.

  • Using different words for the same party or thing

    Students vary words to avoid repetition, as in essay writing.

    Fix: Define the term once and repeat it exactly. In legal drafting, repetition is a virtue.

  • Applying ejusdem generis when the list has only one specific item

    The rule is memorised as a catchphrase without its conditions.

    Fix: The rule needs a list of specific items forming a class, followed by general words. State that condition in the answer.

  • Reaching for contra proferentem first

    It sounds decisive.

    Fix: Use it as a last resort. First apply plain meaning, whole-document reading and intention.

  • Using archaic words such as hereinafter, aforesaid and witnesseth everywhere

    Students believe legal writing must sound old.

    Fix: Prefer plain words. Use a formal term only where it has a settled legal purpose, and keep sentences short.

Worked examples

Example 1

Distinguish between a recital and a definition clause in an agreement. Why does the distinction matter to a drafter?

Show the solution
  1. A recital is a statement of background facts and the intention of the parties, usually introduced by "WHEREAS". Example: that A owns the land and wishes to sell it.
  2. A definition clause fixes the meaning of a term used in the document. Example: "Property" means the land described in Schedule I.
  3. A definition applies wherever the term appears and works as part of the operative text. A recital does not normally create rights or duties.
  4. If an operative clause is clear, a recital cannot override it. If the clause is ambiguous, the recital may help show the parties' intention.
  5. For the drafter, obligations placed only in a recital may not be enforceable, and a term used without a definition may be read in more than one way.

Answer: A recital explains background and intent and generally does not create obligations, while a definition clause gives a term a fixed meaning throughout the document. A drafter puts obligations in operative clauses and defines key terms to avoid ambiguity.

Example 2

A lease says: "The tenant shall not keep cars, buses, trucks or other vehicles in the compound." The tenant parks a bicycle there. The landlord objects. Advise using the rules of interpretation, and suggest a redraft.

Show the solution
  1. The clause lists specific items: cars, buses and trucks. They are all motor vehicles.
  2. "Other vehicles" is a general phrase following these items, so ejusdem generis applies.
  3. The general words are limited to things of the same kind as the listed ones, that is, motor vehicles.
  4. A bicycle is not of that class, so it is likely not covered, unless the document shows a wider intention.
  5. Whole-document reading and the landlord's intention are checked; nothing in the facts shows that bicycles were meant to be barred.
  6. If the landlord did want to bar bicycles, the clause was loosely drafted. Ambiguity may also be read against the landlord as drafter, but only if doubt remains.
  7. Redraft: "The tenant shall not keep any vehicle, whether motorised or not, in the compound without the landlord's written consent."

Answer: The bicycle is probably not covered because "other vehicles" is read as motor vehicles of the same class as cars, buses and trucks. To include bicycles, the landlord should use the redraft with an express wide term and a consent exception.

Exam tips

  • For a distinction question, give three or four points and one example for each side; keep the layout in short paragraphs or bullets.
  • Always quote the exact words of the clause before applying a rule; markers reward application, not recitation.
  • When asked to redraft, show the corrected clause itself, not only an explanation.
  • State the condition for each interpretation rule, such as a class of specific words for ejusdem generis.
  • Keep Latin maxims to those you can explain in a line; always give the plain-English meaning beside them.

Practice questions from General Principles of Drafting

Language, Style and Interpretation in Drafting: frequently asked questions

What is the difference between shall and may in legal drafting?

Shall usually creates a duty that must be performed. May gives a choice or permission. In a private document, use them consistently and say what happens on breach where the duty matters.

Is a recital part of the contract?

A recital is part of the document but it normally states background and intent rather than creating obligations. It can help interpret an unclear operative clause. It cannot override a clear one.

Why should I use plain language in a legal document?

Plain language reduces the chance of two readings and so of disputes. It also helps non-lawyer parties understand what they are signing. Use technical terms only where they have a settled meaning.

What is the golden rule of interpreting documents?

Begin with the ordinary meaning of the words. Depart from it only if it leads to absurdity or conflicts with the rest of the document, and then adopt the least departure needed. Always read the document as a whole.