Skip to content

Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Corporate Tax Planning · Assessment, Audit, Scrutiny, Demand and Recovery, Advance Ruling, Appeals and Revision

Demand and Recovery of Tax under GST

Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Demand and recovery is the process by which the proper officer issues a show cause notice for unpaid tax, wrongly availed ITC or erroneous refund, passes an order, and then collects the dues. For FY 2023-24 and earlier, Section 73 covers non-fraud cases and Section 74 covers fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression cases.

Understand Demand and Recovery of Tax

Tax can go unpaid, be short paid, be refunded by mistake, or ITC can be taken or used wrongly. When the proper officer finds this, the law does not let him simply demand money. He must first serve a show cause notice, hear the taxpayer, and then pass a reasoned order. Recovery starts only after the order.

The Act splits cases by the taxpayer's intent. Section 73 applies where the default is for any reason other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. Section 74 applies where it is by reason of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax. Fraud cases get a longer time limit and a much heavier penalty.

Both sections, as they stand in the text, apply to tax pertaining to the period up to Financial Year 2023-24. For later periods, the Act has a separate provision (Section 74A) that replaced this two-section split. Read the question for the financial year before you pick the section.

The taxpayer always has a way out. He can pay tax and interest on his own ascertainment before notice, and the officer then does not issue a notice for the amount paid. He can also pay within 30 days of the notice and, in Section 73 cases, avoid penalty altogether, subject to Section 73(11). In Section 74 cases he pays a reduced penalty, and the penalty rises the later he pays.

Once the order is passed, the later sections of the chapter deal with collection. The Act provides for the general provisions on orders (Section 75), tax collected but not paid to the Government (Section 76), recovery proceedings and their initiation, payment in instalments, the tax as a first charge on property, provisional attachment, the modes of recovery (Section 79), and the continuation and validation of certain recovery proceedings (Section 84). Learn the modes of recovery as a list of steps the officer can take against a defaulter.

Key rules to remember

Section 73 notice: time limit
Notice ≥ 3 months before the order deadline; order within 3 years from the due date of the annual return for the relevant financial year (or from the date of erroneous refund)
Applies to non-fraud cases for periods up to FY 2023-24. Count the 3 years from the annual return due date, not from the end of the year.
Section 73 penalty on order
Penalty = 10% of tax or ₹10,000, whichever is higher
Charged in the order under Section 73(9), along with tax and interest under Section 50.
Section 73 no-penalty route
Pay tax + interest within 30 days of the show cause notice → no penalty; proceedings deemed concluded
Penalty still applies if self-assessed tax or tax collected was not paid within 30 days from its due date of payment (Section 73(11)), even if you pay within 30 days of the notice.
Section 73 voluntary payment
Pay tax + interest before notice, on own or officer's ascertainment, and inform the officer in writing
The officer shall not serve notice for the tax so paid or any penalty on it, subject to Section 73(11). If the payment falls short, notice can be issued for the shortfall.
Section 74 notice: time limit
Notice ≥ 6 months before the order deadline; order within 5 years from the due date of the annual return (or from the date of erroneous refund)
Applies to fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression cases for periods up to FY 2023-24.
Section 74 penalty ladder
Before notice: 15% of tax | Within 30 days of notice: 25% of tax | Within 30 days of order: 50% of tax | Order after contest: penalty = 100% of tax
In each case, tax and interest under Section 50 are also paid. The 100% penalty is the penalty equivalent to the tax specified in the notice.
Statement for other periods
Section 73(3) and (4): a statement for other periods is deemed to be a notice under Section 73(1) if the grounds are the same as in the earlier notice | Section 74(3) and (4): a statement for other periods is deemed to be a notice under Section 73(1) of the Act if the grounds, except the ground of fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts to evade tax, are the same as in the earlier notice
Under Section 73, the grounds must be the same as in the earlier notice. Under Section 74, the fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression ground need not be the same, but the other grounds must be.
Section 79 modes of recovery
Deduction from money owed to defaulter | Detention and sale of goods | Recovery from third person | Recovery through court or Collector as arrears of land revenue | Magistrate proceedings
Plain-words list. The officer uses these once the amount is due under an order. Section 79 is outside the official text supplied for this page (only Sections 73 and 74), so check the list against the full Act before you quote it.

How to solve Demand and Recovery of Tax questions

Use this method for any case-based question on demand and recovery. It follows the exam pattern: provision, analysis, conclusion.

  1. 1Fix the period. If the tax relates to FY 2023-24 or earlier, Sections 73 and 74 apply. For later periods, say that the separate provision (Section 74A) governs.
  2. 2Find the reason for the default. Look for words like fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression, concealed, forged invoices. If present, it is Section 74. If it is a mistake, a bona fide dispute or a calculation error, it is Section 73.
  3. 3State the notice rule: show cause notice with tax, interest under Section 50 and penalty, served on the person chargeable.
  4. 4Compute the time limits. Take the due date of the annual return, add 3 years (Section 73) or 5 years (Section 74) for the order deadline, and subtract 3 months or 6 months for the last date of notice.
  5. 5List the options available to the taxpayer in order: pay before notice, pay within 30 days of notice, pay within 30 days of order (Section 74 only), or contest and reply.
  6. 6Compute the amounts. Tax plus interest, then the penalty percentage that fits the stage. Show each figure separately.
  7. 7If the question asks about collection, name the modes of recovery under Section 79 and the supporting provisions such as the order payable period, instalments, first charge on property and provisional attachment.
  8. 8Close with a one-line conclusion that answers the exact question asked, such as the section, amount payable or last date.

Quickest way: Fraud or not, then stage of payment

When to use it: Use when the question asks you to compare Sections 73 and 74, or to compute the amount payable at different stages.

  1. Write two columns, Section 73 and Section 74, with these rows: nature of default, notice gap (3 or 6 months), order limit (3 or 5 years), penalty.
  2. Fill in penalty by stage. Section 73: nil if paid within 30 days of notice, otherwise 10% or ₹10,000, whichever is higher. Section 74: 15%, 25%, 50%, 100%.
  3. Add interest under Section 50 to every line. Never leave interest out.
  4. If a date is asked, do the arithmetic once: annual return due date plus 3 or 5 years, then minus 3 or 6 months for notice.
  5. Write the answer in one sentence with the section number.

Common mistakes in Demand and Recovery of Tax

  • Applying Section 73 or 74 to every period without checking the year.

    Students memorise the sections without noting that the text applies to tax pertaining to the period up to FY 2023-24.

    Fix: Write the financial year first in every answer. For later periods, mention that a separate provision (Section 74A) applies.

  • Counting the 3-year or 5-year limit from the end of the financial year.

    It feels natural to count from the year in which the default happened.

    Fix: Count from the due date of furnishing the annual return for that financial year, or from the date of erroneous refund.

  • Mixing up the notice gap with the order limit.

    Both involve months and years in the same sub-section family.

    Fix: Remember: notice must be issued at least 3 months (Section 73) or 6 months (Section 74) before the order deadline. The order deadline is 3 or 5 years.

  • Saying that no penalty applies in Section 74 if tax is paid in 30 days.

    Students carry over the Section 73 no-penalty rule.

    Fix: Under Section 74, paying within 30 days of notice still needs a 25% penalty. Only then are proceedings on that notice concluded.

  • Forgetting interest under Section 50 in the amount payable.

    Focus stays on the penalty percentage.

    Fix: Write the formula as tax + interest + penalty every time, and show interest as its own line.

  • Assuming concluded proceedings also end prosecution.

    The words 'all proceedings deemed concluded' sound complete.

    Fix: Explanation 1 says those words do not include proceedings under Section 132, which deals with offences and prosecution.

Worked examples

Example 1

Anand Traders Pvt Ltd short paid GST of ₹5,00,000 for FY 2022-23 due to a wrong rate applied in good faith. Assume the due date for the annual return for that year was 31 December 2023 and interest under Section 50 is ₹1,00,000. Assume also that Section 73(11) does not apply, that is, there is no self-assessed tax or tax collected as tax that stayed unpaid for more than 30 days after its due date. The officer issues a notice under Section 73. What are the time limits, and what is payable if the company (a) pays within 30 days of the notice, (b) contests and loses?

Show the solution
  1. The period is up to FY 2023-24 and there is no fraud or suppression, so Section 73 applies.
  2. Order limit: 3 years from 31 December 2023, so the order must be issued by 31 December 2026.
  3. Notice must be issued at least 3 months before that, so by 30 September 2026.
  4. (a) Pay tax and interest within 30 days of the notice: ₹5,00,000 + ₹1,00,000 = ₹6,00,000. Since Section 73(11) is assumed not to apply, no penalty is payable and proceedings on the notice are deemed concluded. If Section 73(11) did apply, penalty under Section 73(9) would still be payable.
  5. (b) If the company contests and loses, the order under Section 73(9) carries penalty of 10% of tax or ₹10,000, whichever is higher. 10% of ₹5,00,000 = ₹50,000, which is higher than ₹10,000.
  6. Total on order = ₹5,00,000 + ₹1,00,000 + ₹50,000 = ₹6,50,000.

Answer: Order by 31 December 2026 and notice by 30 September 2026. Under (a) the company pays ₹6,00,000 with no penalty, on the assumption that Section 73(11) does not apply. Under (b) the amount is ₹6,50,000, including a penalty of ₹50,000.

Example 2

Meera Enterprises availed ITC of ₹8,00,000 on invoices from non-existent suppliers, a case of fraud for FY 2021-22. Assume interest under Section 50 is ₹2,00,000 and the annual return due date was 31 December 2022. State the time limits and the total payable if it pays (a) before notice, (b) within 30 days of notice, (c) within 30 days of the order. What is the position if it contests and the order confirms the demand?

Show the solution
  1. Fraud is involved and the period is before FY 2024-25, so Section 74 applies.
  2. Order limit: 5 years from 31 December 2022, so by 31 December 2027. Notice must be at least 6 months earlier, so by 30 June 2027.
  3. (a) Before notice: tax ₹8,00,000 + interest ₹2,00,000 + 15% penalty of ₹1,20,000 = ₹11,20,000. The officer shall not serve notice for the tax so paid.
  4. (b) Within 30 days of notice: penalty 25% of ₹8,00,000 = ₹2,00,000. Total = ₹8,00,000 + ₹2,00,000 + ₹2,00,000 = ₹12,00,000. Proceedings on the notice are deemed concluded.
  5. (c) Within 30 days of communication of the order: penalty 50% = ₹4,00,000. Total = ₹8,00,000 + ₹2,00,000 + ₹4,00,000 = ₹14,00,000.
  6. If it contests and the order confirms the demand, the penalty is equal to the tax specified in the notice, ₹8,00,000. Total = ₹8,00,000 + ₹2,00,000 + ₹8,00,000 = ₹18,00,000. Prosecution under Section 132 is not covered by 'all proceedings'.

Answer: Notice by 30 June 2027 and order by 31 December 2027. Payable: ₹11,20,000 before notice, ₹12,00,000 within 30 days of notice, ₹14,00,000 within 30 days of order, and ₹18,00,000 if the full demand is confirmed after contest.

Exam tips

  • Draw the Section 73 versus Section 74 comparison in a small list of rows: trigger, notice gap, order limit, penalty. Examiners reward the contrast.
  • Always write the financial year and the annual return due date before you compute any deadline.
  • Show the interest line separately in numerical answers, even if the figure is given.
  • For recovery questions, list the modes under Section 79 in plain words and tie each to the facts, for example a bank balance or stock of goods.
  • Do not say proceedings under Section 132 stop when a notice is concluded. State the Explanation 1 exception.

Practice questions from Assessment, Audit, Scrutiny, Demand and Recovery, Advance Ruling, Appeals and Revision

Demand and Recovery of Tax: frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Section 73 and Section 74 of the CGST Act?

Section 73 deals with default for reasons other than fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts. Section 74 deals with default by reason of those. Section 73 gives 3 years for the order and a 3 month notice gap. Section 74 gives 5 years and a 6 month gap, with a penalty that can reach 100% of tax.

Can I avoid penalty by paying before the show cause notice?

Under Section 73, generally yes. If you pay tax and interest before notice and inform the officer in writing, he shall not issue notice for the tax paid or any penalty on it. But under Section 73(11), penalty is still payable where self-assessed tax or tax collected as tax was not paid within 30 days from the due date of payment. Under Section 74, you must also pay a penalty of 15% of the tax. In both cases the officer can issue notice for any shortfall.

What are the modes of recovery of tax under Section 79?

The officer can deduct the amount from money owed to the defaulter, detain and sell his goods, recover from a third person who holds money for him, or have the dues recovered through a court or Collector as arrears of land revenue. He can also file proceedings before a Magistrate. These are used after the dues become payable under an order. Section 79 is outside the official text supplied for this page, so confirm the list against the full Act.

How should I reply to a GST show cause notice?

Check the section invoked, the period, and whether fraud is alleged. Reply in writing within the time stated, deal with each ground using documents, and challenge any wrong time limit or wrong section. Ask for a personal hearing, and consider paying undisputed tax with interest early to reduce penalty.

Do Sections 73 and 74 apply to all financial years?

As in the supplied text, they apply to tax pertaining to the period up to Financial Year 2023-24. For later periods, a separate provision (Section 74A) applies; this is outside the supplied text, so check it in the full Act. Always check the financial year in the question.