Skip to content

CS Professional · Insolvency and Bankruptcy - Law and Practice

Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5) CS Professional

Cross border insolvency deals with a debtor whose assets, creditors or proceedings fall in more than one country. Under the IBC, Sections 234 and 235 let India make reciprocal arrangements and send a letter of request abroad. To solve questions, state the provision, apply it to the facts, then conclude.

What this chapter covers

This chapter covers what happens when a corporate debtor has assets or creditors outside India. You study the problem first: separate proceedings in many countries, conflicting orders and assets that escape the estate. Then you study the tools: the two IBC sections, the UNCITRAL Model Law, and the proposals made for India.

The IBC itself has only a thin framework. Section 234 lets the Central Government enter into agreements with other countries and, by notification, make the Code's application to assets abroad subject to conditions, where reciprocal arrangements exist. Section 235 lets a resolution professional, liquidator or bankruptcy trustee apply to the Adjudicating Authority, which may issue a letter of request to a foreign court or authority. The Model Law and the committee proposals show how the gap could be filled.

The chapter links to the rest of Elective 7.5. You need the corporate insolvency resolution process, the role of the resolution professional, liquidation and the Adjudicating Authority already clear. Cross border questions are usually those same processes with a foreign element added.

This is a compact chapter with a clear structure, so it is easy to score well if you prepare it properly. Examiners can set a short law question on Sections 234 and 235, or a case-based question on a debtor with foreign assets or parallel proceedings. Since the paper is written and case-based, you earn marks by stating the provision, applying it to the facts and reaching a conclusion. Many students skip this chapter because it looks theoretical. That is a mistake, because a well-organised answer here stands out.

Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5): topics in the order to study them

  1. 1Introduction to Cross Border InsolvencyIt explains the problem and key terms like main and non-main proceedings, so later topics make sense.
  2. 2Cross Border Insolvency under IBC 2016 (Sections 234 and 235)This is the actual law in force in India, so it needs the most careful reading and is most likely to be asked.
  3. 3UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross Border InsolvencyIt shows the international framework against which India's gaps are measured.
  4. 4Recognition and Relief under the Model LawIt builds on the Model Law structure and covers what recognition does for a foreign representative.
  5. 5Insolvency Law Committee Report and Proposed Framework for IndiaYou can compare the proposals with Sections 234 and 235 and the Model Law once you know both.
  6. 6Cross Border Insolvency Cases and Concurrent ProceedingsCases are best studied last, when you can apply all the rules to real facts.

How to prepare Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5)

Treat this chapter as one problem with three layers: the gap, the current law and the proposed fix. Prepare it in this way.

  1. Read Sections 234 and 235 from the Code itself. Note who can act, which authority approves and what the letter of request does.
  2. Write a one-page comparison: what the IBC provides versus what the Model Law provides. Use two columns in your notes.
  3. Learn the Model Law ideas in plain words: foreign representative, access to courts, recognition, relief, cooperation and coordination of concurrent proceedings.
  4. Read the Insolvency Law Committee proposals as a set of recommendations, and remember them as proposals, not as law in force.
  5. For each case in your study material, note the facts, the issue, the decision and the principle it shows.
  6. Practise two or three case-based answers using provision, analysis and conclusion. Time yourself so you can write each in the limits of a three-hour paper.

Common mistakes in Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5)

  • Saying Section 235 works for any foreign asset.

    Fix: Always state that the country must have reciprocal arrangements made under Section 234 before Section 235 applies.

  • Writing that the IBC has adopted the UNCITRAL Model Law.

    Fix: Say clearly that the IBC has only Sections 234 and 235 on this subject, and the Model Law-based framework is a proposal.

  • Naming the wrong person who applies under Section 235.

    Fix: Remember that the resolution professional, liquidator or bankruptcy trustee may apply, depending on the process.

  • Saying the foreign court is directly ordered by the Indian tribunal.

    Fix: Explain that the Adjudicating Authority issues a request to a competent foreign court or authority; it does not command it.

  • Listing cases without the principle they show.

    Fix: For each case, write facts, issue, decision and the point about concurrent proceedings or jurisdiction in two or three lines.

  • Writing theory answers to case-based questions.

    Fix: Open with the provision, apply it to the facts given, and end with a clear conclusion and practical step.

Last-day revision: Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5)

  • Cross border insolvency arises when assets, creditors or proceedings are in more than one country.
  • Section 234(1): the Central Government may enter into an agreement with a foreign government to enforce the Code.
  • Section 234(2): by notification, application of the Code to assets abroad in a country with reciprocal arrangements is subject to specified conditions.
  • Section 235 needs a reciprocal arrangement under Section 234 with the country concerned.
  • Under Section 235, the resolution professional, liquidator or bankruptcy trustee applies to the Adjudicating Authority.
  • The application says evidence or action relating to assets abroad is required for the process or proceeding.
  • The Adjudicating Authority must be satisfied, and then may issue a letter of request to a competent foreign court or authority.
  • The words are 'may', so issuing the letter is discretionary, not automatic.
  • The Model Law is a template for countries to adopt, not a treaty that binds India automatically.
  • Model Law themes: access, recognition, relief and cooperation between courts and representatives.
  • Committee recommendations are proposals for a framework; do not describe them as enacted law.
  • Always write answers as provision, analysis of facts, conclusion.

Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5) practice questions

Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5) in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Cross Border Insolvency (Elective 7.5): frequently asked questions

Which sections of the IBC deal with cross border insolvency?

Sections 234 and 235. Section 234 covers agreements with foreign countries and the conditions for assets abroad. Section 235 covers the letter of request to a country outside India.

Who can apply for a letter of request under Section 235?

The resolution professional, liquidator or bankruptcy trustee, as the case may be. The application goes to the Adjudicating Authority, which must be satisfied that evidence or action relating to foreign assets is required.

Is the UNCITRAL Model Law part of Indian law?

No. It is a model for countries to adopt. The IBC provisions on this subject are Sections 234 and 235, and the Model Law-based approach is something proposed for India.

How should I answer a case-based question from this chapter?

State the relevant provision, apply it to the facts such as foreign assets or parallel proceedings, and give a clear conclusion. Add a practical step, such as an application to the Adjudicating Authority.