Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II

Early Warning Indicators for Liquidity Risk in FRM Part II

Early warning indicators (EWIs) are metrics that signal rising liquidity stress before it hits the balance sheet. To solve exam questions, classify the indicator (internal or external, funding or market), check its threshold and trigger, and name the action it should start, such as escalation to the ALCO or contingency funding plan activation.

What this chapter covers

This chapter sits in the Liquidity and Treasury Risk Measurement and Management topic of FRM Part II. It covers how a bank spots liquidity stress early, before ratios like the LCR or NSFR deteriorate. You learn what EWIs are, what types exist, how to design them and how to govern them.

The content is practical. You see indicators such as funding cost spreads, deposit outflows, concentration of funding, rating or CDS changes, and market signals like falling share price. You then see how each indicator needs a threshold, a trigger and a defined response.

The chapter links closely to stress testing, the contingency funding plan, liquidity buffers and liquidity risk reporting. Questions often put you in a case: a bank shows several signals, and you must judge severity, the right escalation and the limits of the data. Expect applied, scenario-style multiple-choice questions, not calculations.

The exam has 80 equally weighted multiple-choice questions in 4 hours, and liquidity questions reward clear classification and sound judgement. This chapter is compact, so you can master it quickly. It also feeds other liquidity chapters: the contingency funding plan only works if indicators trigger it, and stress testing needs indicators to calibrate scenarios. Learn the logic once and you can answer questions across the topic.

Early Warning Indicators: topics in the order to study them

  1. 1Early Warning Indicators in Liquidity RiskStart here to learn what an EWI is, why liquidity stress builds before it shows in reported ratios, and how EWIs differ from limits and backward-looking measures.
  2. 2Types of Early Warning IndicatorsOnce you know the purpose, learn the categories (internal and external, funding, market and asset-side) so you can classify any signal in a case.
  3. 3Designing Metrics, Thresholds and TriggersDesign builds on types: you need to know what is being measured before you decide how to set levels, tiers and the action each breach starts.
  4. 4Monitoring, Governance and Limitations of IndicatorsFinish with who reviews indicators, how often, how breaches are escalated and where indicators fail, which ties the whole chapter together.

How to prepare Early Warning Indicators

Treat this chapter as a framework you apply to cases. Memorise the structure, then practise reading scenarios against it.

  1. Write a one-page map: purpose, types, design, governance, limitations. Rebuild it from memory until it is automatic.
  2. List indicators under four headings: funding, market, asset-side and institution-specific. Add one line on what each signals.
  3. For each indicator, practise stating a plausible threshold logic: amber for early attention, red for escalation. Focus on the logic, not specific numbers.
  4. Link each trigger to its action: more frequent monitoring, escalation to senior management or the ALCO, or contingency funding plan activation.
  5. Practise scenario MCQs. Identify which signals are real warning signs, which are noise, and what the best next step is.
  6. Revise limitations last: false alarms, missed signals, data lags, correlation across indicators and over-reliance on any single metric.

Common mistakes in Early Warning Indicators

  • Treating EWIs as the same as liquidity limits.

    Fix: Remember that limits constrain risk-taking, while EWIs signal that stress may be developing and prompt review or action.

  • Assuming a breach always means activating the contingency funding plan.

    Fix: Use tiered responses: heightened monitoring first, then escalation, with plan activation for severe or multiple breaches.

  • Relying on one indicator in a case.

    Fix: Look at the full set of signals and judge whether they are consistent and whether they are institution-specific or market-wide.

  • Ignoring limitations of indicators.

    Fix: Prepare a short list: false alarms, missed signals, data delays and correlation in crisis. Expect options that test them.

  • Confusing internal and external indicators.

    Fix: Ask whether the data comes from the bank's own records or from markets and third parties, and note when a signal mixes both.

  • Forgetting governance and ownership.

    Fix: For every indicator, name who monitors it, who is told on a breach and how often thresholds are reviewed.

Last-day revision: Early Warning Indicators

  • An EWI signals potential liquidity stress before it appears in reported metrics.
  • EWIs are forward-looking; ratios such as LCR and NSFR are not designed as early signals.
  • Indicators can be internal (deposit outflows, funding concentration) or external (market spreads, rating actions).
  • Funding cost rises, shorter wholesale maturities and falling deposits are typical funding-side warnings.
  • Market signals include widening CDS spreads, falling share price and lower market access.
  • Each indicator needs a metric, a threshold and a defined trigger action.
  • Tiered thresholds let you escalate gradually rather than react all at once.
  • Breaches should be escalated to senior management or the ALCO under a set governance process.
  • A trigger should link to the contingency funding plan.
  • Review indicators regularly and recalibrate after stress events or business changes.
  • Limitations: false positives, false negatives, data lags and indicators moving together in a crisis.
  • No single indicator is enough; use a dashboard and judgement.

Early Warning Indicators practice questions

Early Warning Indicators: frequently asked questions

What are early warning indicators in liquidity risk?

They are metrics that show liquidity stress may be building, before it appears in reported ratios or in actual funding shortfalls. Examples include deposit outflows, rising funding costs and market signals such as widening CDS spreads. They prompt review and action.

Do I need to memorise numerical thresholds?

No. The chapter tests the logic of setting thresholds and linking them to triggers and actions. Focus on tiered levels, calibration and escalation, not on fixed numbers.

How are EWIs connected to the contingency funding plan?

EWIs are what trigger escalation and, when severe enough, activation of the contingency funding plan. Without clear indicators and triggers, the plan may start too late.

How long should I spend on this chapter?

It is a short, conceptual chapter, so a focused study session plus a few rounds of scenario practice is usually enough. Spend extra time on limitations and governance, because candidates often skip them.