Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II

Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds

Due diligence on managers and funds is a structured review of a hedge fund or manager before and after you invest. It covers strategy, track record, operations, risk, liquidity, valuation, people, governance and terms. To solve questions, find the red flag, name the risk it creates, and pick the response that best protects the investor.

What this chapter covers

This chapter is about how an investor, such as a fund of funds, pension plan or allocator, decides whether to trust a specific manager or fund with capital. The review has two halves. Investment due diligence asks whether the strategy is sound, repeatable and well run. Operational due diligence asks whether the firm can run it safely, with proper controls, honest valuation and independent service providers.

You will work through five areas: the overall process and framework, strategy and track record, operations and fraud risk, risk management, liquidity and valuation, and finally the manager's background, governance and fund terms. Questions are applied. You are given a short case with a few facts and asked what concerns you most, what to ask next, or which finding is a red flag.

The chapter belongs to the Risk Management and Investment Management topic of FRM Part II. It links to market risk measures such as VaR and drawdown, to liquidity risk in funds, to operational risk and fraud, and to Current Issues themes like private credit and digital assets, where valuation and transparency problems are common. Treat it as a place to apply earlier knowledge, not memorise a new toolkit.

The exam has 80 equally weighted multiple-choice questions across six topics, so every area matters and no single chapter decides the result. This chapter rewards judgement more than calculation, which makes it a good place to gain reliable points. The same red flags repeat in different cases: weak independence, unclear valuation, style drift, concentrated investors, and poor disclosure. Once you can spot these quickly and link each to the risk it creates, you answer faster and save time for harder numerical questions elsewhere. The skills are also useful in real allocator and risk roles.

Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds: topics in the order to study them

  1. 1Due Diligence Process and Framework for Hedge FundsStart here because it gives the map of the whole review: what is checked, in what order, and why both investment and operational work are needed.
  2. 2Investment Strategy and Track Record EvaluationNext, learn how to judge what the manager does and whether past results are credible, since this sets up every later risk question.
  3. 3Risk Management, Liquidity and Valuation ReviewThis builds on strategy by testing how risk is measured and limited, how liquid the assets are, and how positions are priced.
  4. 4Operational Due Diligence and Fraud RiskWith the investment side clear, study controls, service providers and fraud warning signs, which draw heavily on valuation and independence ideas.
  5. 5Manager Background, Governance and Fund TermsFinish with people, oversight and legal terms, which tie the earlier findings together and show whether investor interests are protected.

How to prepare Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds

Prepare this chapter by learning the checks, then practising how to turn short case facts into a clear risk conclusion.

  1. Read the framework topic first and write a one-page map of the review: strategy, track record, risk, liquidity, valuation, operations, people, governance and terms.
  2. For each area, list the questions an allocator would ask and the red flags that would worry you. Keep each list short enough to recall without notes.
  3. Practise track record analysis with returns, volatility, drawdown and consistency, and always ask what could make the record misleading, such as short history, survivorship or style drift.
  4. Study liquidity by matching asset liquidity to fund terms, including redemption frequency, notice periods, gates and lock-ups. Ask what happens if many investors leave at once.
  5. For valuation and operations, focus on independence: who prices positions, who administers the fund, who audits it, and who controls cash movement.
  6. Do timed case-style questions on a phone or paper. For each, name the red flag, the risk it creates and the best next action before reading the options.
  7. In the last week, review your red-flag lists and the questions you got wrong, and note why the correct option was better than the closest alternative.

Common mistakes in Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds

  • Treating a strong track record as proof of skill.

    Fix: Always test the record for short history, luck, survivorship, changing fund size, style drift and the risk taken to earn the returns.

  • Focusing only on investment merit and skipping operational risk.

    Fix: Remember that a good strategy can still fail through poor controls or fraud. Check operations as seriously as investments.

  • Ignoring the mismatch between asset liquidity and fund terms.

    Fix: Compare how fast positions can be sold with how fast investors can redeem. Look for gates, notice periods and lock-ups.

  • Accepting manager-provided valuation without asking who checks it.

    Fix: Ask who sets prices, how hard-to-value assets are handled, and whether an independent administrator verifies them.

  • Picking an answer that sounds cautious rather than one that addresses the stated red flag.

    Fix: Name the specific risk in the case first, then choose the option that directly reduces or tests that risk.

  • Overlooking governance and terms such as side letters and conflicts.

    Fix: Learn how terms affect investors: preferential rights, fee structures and oversight can change your risk even when performance looks fine.

Last-day revision: Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds

  • Due diligence has two parts: investment review and operational review. Both are needed.
  • Check that strategy is clear, repeatable and consistent with what the manager says it does.
  • A track record needs context: length, market conditions, size of assets then and now, and consistency of strategy.
  • Style drift means the fund moves away from its stated strategy and is a warning sign.
  • Judge returns alongside risk, such as volatility and drawdown, not returns alone.
  • Match asset liquidity to redemption terms; illiquid assets with frequent redemptions create a run risk.
  • Independent valuation is key; manager-controlled pricing of hard-to-value assets is a red flag.
  • Independent administrator, auditor and prime broker or custodian reduce fraud risk.
  • Weak controls, key-person dependence and unexplained returns are common fraud and failure signals.
  • Check the manager's background, references, past conflicts and any regulatory or legal history.
  • Governance includes board oversight, conflicts policy and clear fee and side-letter terms.
  • Ask whether some investors get better liquidity or transparency terms than others, and what that means for you.

Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds practice questions

Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Performing Due Diligence on Specific Managers and Funds: frequently asked questions

Is this chapter calculation-heavy?

Not mainly. Expect case-style questions that test judgement, with some use of return and risk measures. You need to interpret the numbers and link them to a due diligence concern.

What is the difference between investment and operational due diligence?

Investment due diligence tests the strategy, process, risk and track record. Operational due diligence tests the firm's controls, service providers, valuation process and fraud risk. A fund can pass one and fail the other.

How does this chapter connect to the rest of FRM Part II?

It uses ideas from market risk, liquidity risk and operational risk, and it sits within the Risk Management and Investment Management topic. It also relates to Current Issues themes such as private credit and digital assets, where valuation and transparency matter.

How should I study this on my phone?

Keep short red-flag lists and review them in small sessions. Then practise short case questions and say the risk and best action before you look at the options.