Skip to content

CA Intermediate · January 2026 · Paper 5

CA Intermediate Auditing and Ethics January 2026: paper analysis

Our own analysis of the official paper, as of 12 October 2026. The questions and answers belong to ICAI; read them on ICAI's website.

Chapter-wise marks

Where the marks were in this paper (out of 100; internal-choice alternatives not double counted).

What each question tested

In our words, by question number. Open the official paper for the full question.

QMarksTestsChapter
1(a)5Engagement partner responsibilities for direction, review and engagement quality control review under SA 220Nature, Objective and Scope of Audit
1(b)5Identifying applicable engagement standards and contrasting reasonable and limited assuranceNature, Objective and Scope of Audit
1(c)4Letter of specific inquiry to legal counsel and auditor's response if management refuses contactAudit Evidence
2(a)5Matters to include in management's written representation letterCompletion and Review
2(b)5Preliminary engagement procedures before continuing an existing client relationshipAudit Strategy, Audit Planning and Audit Programme
2(c)4CARO reporting where physical verification of inventory is not carried outAudit Report
3(a)5Emphasis of matter paragraph: meaning and situations requiring itAudit Report
3(b)5Items excluded from audit documentation and whether working papers must be given to the clientAudit Documentation
3(c)4Understanding and evaluating an automated accounting environment for audit planningRisk Assessment and Internal Control
4(a)5Meaning of misstatement with examples, applied to capital expenditure charged to revenueCompletion and Review
4(b)5Recognition criteria and cost elements for property, plant and equipmentAudit of Items of Financial Statements
4(c)4Quality control requirements on independence and engagement quality review under SQC 1Nature, Objective and Scope of Audit
5(a)5Auditor's responsibilities for facts discovered after the financial statements are issuedCompletion and Review
5(b)5Audit procedures for verifying receipts of a non-governmental organisationSpecial Features of Audit of Different Type of Entities
5(c)4Engagement team discussion and sharing audit plan elements with managementAudit Strategy, Audit Planning and Audit Programme
6(a)5Asset classification and provisioning of doubtful advances under RBI prudential normsAudit of Banks
6(b)5When to rely less on internal audit work and do more directlyRisk Assessment and Internal Control
6(c)4Audit against rules and orders in government auditSpecial Features of Audit of Different Type of Entities
6(c) OR4Audit procedures for valuation of trade payables and other current liabilitiesAudit of Items of Financial Statements

What stood out

  • Almost every descriptive question was framed as a practical scenario, even where the underlying requirement was standard-based recall.
  • Completion and review (written representations, misstatements, subsequent events) carried 15 marks in the written part.
  • Ethics was tested only through MCQs this attempt, with three questions on threats and communication with previous auditors.
  • Quality control (SA 220 and SQC 1) appeared twice in the written part.
  • Bank audit was limited to a single classification and provisioning question plus one MCQ.

Practise the chapters that carried the marks

Nature, Objective and Scope of Audit, Completion and Review, Special Features of Audit of Different Type of Entities: study guides and practice questions in the CA Intermediate format.