Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Central Clearing

A bank clears interest rate swaps through a qualifying central counterparty (QCCP) under Basel III. Which statement best describes the regulatory capital treatment of the bank's trade exposures to that QCCP?

Under Basel III, a bank's trade exposures to a qualifying central counterparty receive a 2% risk weight, far lower than many bilateral exposures. Default fund contributions are capitalised separately, so a blanket zero or 100% weight is wrong.

  1. AA risk weight of 2% applies to trade exposures to the QCCP, compared with the much higher weights applied to bilateral non-cleared exposures to many corporatesCorrect
  2. BA 0% risk weight applies to all exposures to the QCCP, including default fund contributions
  3. CA 100% risk weight applies to trade exposures because CCPs are unrated entities
  4. DTrade exposures are exempt from CVA capital but attract the full bilateral SA-CCR add-on

Explanation

Basel III assigns a 2% risk weight to clearing member trade exposures to a QCCP (4% under certain conditions where client-clearing arrangements do not meet requirements). Default fund contributions are treated separately and are not zero-weighted. The 0% and 100% options misstate the standard.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Central Clearing shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Central Clearing questions