FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A bank computes 1-day 99% historical simulation VaR using the last 250 daily returns on a portfolio worth USD 100 million. The three worst returns in the window are -4.0%, -3.2% and -2.6%, and the fourth worst is -2.1%. Using the convention that VaR is the loss at the observation that leaves 1% of observations in the tail (rounded to the nearest whole observation, 2.5 rounded up to 3), what is VaR?
VaR is USD 2.6 million. One percent of 250 observations is 2.5, rounded to 3, so the third worst return, -2.6%, defines the cutoff. Applying 2.6% to the USD 100 million portfolio gives the loss estimate.
- AUSD 4.0 million
- BUSD 3.2 million
- CUSD 2.6 millionCorrect
- DUSD 2.1 million
Explanation
1% of 250 is 2.5 observations, rounded up to 3. The third worst return is -2.6%, so VaR = 2.6% x 100 million = USD 2.6 million. Using the worst return (4.0 million) ignores the percentile; 3.2 is the second worst.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A bank has two independent bonds, each with a 4% chance of default within the horizon, and a loss of USD 100 if default occurs (otherwise ze…
- A portfolio's daily returns are normally distributed with mean zero and standard deviation 1.5% of a USD 80 million portfolio. Using z-value…
- A portfolio's loss distribution is approximated by 100 equally likely historical simulation outcomes. The five worst losses (in USD millions…
- A risk manager is deciding whether to model the tail of a P&L series with a normal distribution or a Student t distribution. She produces tw…
- An analyst builds a QQ plot of 200 daily returns against a normal distribution fitted by sample mean and standard deviation. The plot is a s…
- A bank backtests a VaR model and notes that the 95% confidence interval around its 99% VaR estimate is very wide. Which interpretation is mo…