Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Derivatives

A bank enters a cross-currency swap with a sovereign-linked entity in an emerging market, receiving the emerging-market currency and paying USD. Which statement best describes the risk and a suitable mitigant?

This is wrong-way risk. A sovereign or currency crisis simultaneously raises the counterparty's default probability and drives the currency moves that damage the bank's position. Mitigation includes hard-currency collateral, higher haircuts or add-ons for currency mismatch, and limits on such trades.

  1. AIt is right-way risk because the bank benefits when the local currency strengthens
  2. BIt is general right-way risk and requires no mitigation since exposure falls in crises
  3. CIt is general wrong-way risk only if the swap is unsecured and USD-denominated
  4. DIt is wrong-way risk: a crisis weakens the local currency, raising the bank's loss on received payments and the counterparty's default probability together; mitigants include collateral in a hard currency and haircuts or add-ons for currency mismatchCorrect

Explanation

The bank receives local currency, so a depreciation reduces the value of its receipts; but the framing of exposure here treats the bank as owed amounts in a currency whose collapse coincides with the sovereign-linked entity's distress. The dependence between currency crisis and default creates wrong-way risk, mitigated with hard-currency collateral and conservative haircuts or add-ons.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Derivatives shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Derivatives questions