Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Case Study: Third-party Risk Management

A bank has a critical service with an impact tolerance of 8 hours. During a vendor failure test, detection takes 1.5 hours, the decision to invoke the contingency plan takes 2 hours, failover to the backup provider takes 3.5 hours, and data reconciliation before customers can transact takes 2 hours. All steps occur sequentially. What is the result against tolerance?

Total recovery time is 9 hours (1.5 + 2 + 3.5 + 2), which exceeds the 8-hour impact tolerance by 1 hour. Ignoring the reconciliation step would wrongly suggest 7 hours and compliance, but customers cannot transact until reconciliation is complete.

  1. ATotal recovery of 9 hours exceeds the tolerance by 1 hourCorrect
  2. BTotal recovery of 7 hours is within tolerance by 1 hour
  3. CTotal recovery of 9 hours exceeds the tolerance by 2 hours
  4. DTotal recovery of 8 hours exactly meets tolerance

Explanation

Sequential steps sum: 1.5 + 2 + 3.5 + 2 = 9 hours. Against an 8-hour tolerance, the breach is 1 hour. Omitting reconciliation gives 7 hours, wrongly within tolerance, which is the key error.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Case Study: Third-party Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Case Study: Third-party Risk Management questions