FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Fundamental Review of the Trading Book
A bank has a trading book securitisation position with a notional of 50 million. The securitisation default risk charge under the standardised approach uses a jump-to-default style measure. The position is long, has a risk weight of 8% for default risk, and the bank also holds a short hedge of 10 million in the same tranche with the same risk weight. Ignoring any further netting or buckets, what is the capital for the net long exposure?
The capital is 3.2 million. The short 10 million hedge in the same tranche offsets the 50 million long, leaving a net 40 million exposure, and applying the 8% risk weight gives 3.2 million. Ignoring the hedge would overstate the charge at 4.0 million.
- A3.2 millionCorrect
- B4.0 million
- C0.8 million
- D4.8 million
Explanation
Net the long and short in the same tranche: 50 - 10 = 40 million. Apply the 8% risk weight: 40 x 0.08 = 3.2 million. The 4.0 million option applies the risk weight to the gross long exposure only, ignoring the hedge. The 0.8 million option charges only the hedge, and the 4.8 million option sums the long and the short.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Fundamental Review of the Trading Book shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Fundamental Review of the Trading Book questions
- Under the FRTB internal models approach, which risk measure replaced 99% Value-at-Risk as the basis for calculating trading book market risk…
- A risk analyst notes that under Basel 2.5 the trading book capital for securitization positions was criticized as inadequate and inconsisten…
- Under Basel 2.5, which pair of additional capital charges was introduced to supplement the 10-day 99% VaR charge for the trading book?
- A bank's internal model computes expected shortfall using liquidity horizons that differ by risk factor category. Under FRTB, what is the pu…
- Before FRTB, a trading desk held a securitization position that was moved from the trading book to the banking book during the crisis once l…
- A bank's trading desk has had 14 backtesting exceptions against 99% VaR over the latest 250 trading days and is therefore failing desk-level…