FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Evolution of Stress Testing Counterparty Exposures
A bank holds USD 30 million of collateral against a counterparty, in the form of corporate bonds, under a one-way credit support annex. The portfolio mark-to-market to the bank is USD 50 million. In a stress scenario the portfolio value rises by USD 20 million, the bonds suffer a 25% price fall, and the counterparty defaults with no further margin received. What is the bank's stressed uncollateralised exposure after close-out?
The stressed exposure is USD 47.5 million. The portfolio rises to USD 70 million, while the USD 30 million of bonds fall 25% to USD 22.5 million, leaving USD 47.5 million uncovered.
- AUSD 40.0 million
- BUSD 47.5 million
- CUSD 62.5 millionCorrect
- DUSD 70.0 million
Explanation
Stressed portfolio value is 50+20=USD 70 million. Collateral value is 30x(1-0.25)=USD 22.5 million. Net exposure is 70-22.5=USD 47.5 million. Check the options: 47.5 is the option matching this figure, so the key is USD 47.5 million.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Evolution of Stress Testing Counterparty Exposures shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Evolution of Stress Testing Counterparty Exposures questions
- A bank's stress test shows a stressed potential exposure to Counterparty X of USD 120 million against a board-approved stress exposure limit…
- A bank's board receives counterparty credit stress test results only as a single aggregate loss number once a year. Which change would best …
- A bank's stress test on a portfolio of derivatives counterparties indicates that the loss would come mainly from wrong-way risk with a few c…
- After a crisis in which a major dealer failed, a bank revises its counterparty stress testing. Which change best reflects the lesson that co…
- A bank runs a reverse stress test on its counterparty credit risk. The risk committee sets the goal of finding scenarios that would cause a …
- Which use of counterparty stress test results is best supported by supervisory expectations for large dealer banks?