Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Identification

A bank is reviewing a 5 million loss. A vendor's software update (an external event) failed because internal change management did not require regression testing, and operators then manually re-entered 4,000 transactions, making errors. Which approach to recording the event is most consistent with a sound taxonomy and framework?

Record it once as a Business Disruption and System Failures event, with linked causal factors for the vendor, weak change management and manual operator errors. This captures the loss once while preserving root-cause insight; it was not fraud, should not be triple counted, and should not be excluded.

  1. ARecord one event under External Fraud because a third party was involved
  2. BRecord one event under Business Disruption and System Failures, with linked causal factors for third-party, change-management process and people failuresCorrect
  3. CRecord three separate losses, each of 5 million, one per cause, to reflect each failure
  4. DExclude it from the loss database because the trigger was external

Explanation

The loss is one event with a primary event type (system failure) and multiple causes. Tagging causes preserves root-cause analysis without inflating losses. Triple recording overstates the loss; external triggers still belong in the database; no fraud occurred.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Identification shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Identification questions