Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Governance

A bank observes that, in a benign credit cycle, loan officers are being rewarded on origination volume and the share of approvals granted as policy exceptions has risen from 3% to 11% over two years. Which governance response best addresses the root cause?

The best response is to align incentives with risk-adjusted results and loan quality, and have independent credit risk report exception trends to the board risk committee. Volume-based pay is driving looser underwriting; changing limits or hiding exceptions would only conceal the weakening of standards.

  1. ARaise the single-name exposure limits so fewer approvals count as exceptions
  2. BRebalance incentives to include risk-adjusted performance and loan quality, and have independent credit risk report exception trends to the board risk committeeCorrect
  3. CMove all approvals to the front-line business to speed up decisions
  4. DStop recording exceptions to avoid signaling weak standards

Explanation

Rising exceptions alongside volume-based pay indicate an incentive conflict that erodes underwriting discipline. The fix is aligned compensation and independent monitoring with board-level reporting. Raising limits or hiding exceptions masks the problem.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Governance questions