Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Governance

A bank redesigns trader compensation after a review finds bonuses were paid fully in cash on annual revenue, with no adjustment for risk. Which redesign best aligns pay with the long-term risk profile of the bank?

Deferring a substantial share of bonuses in equity-linked form with malus and clawback, and sizing the pool on risk-adjusted performance, best aligns pay with long-term risk. It lets losses and risk outcomes emerge before pay vests, unlike upfront cash tied to revenue or trade volume.

  1. ARaise the cash bonus pool percentage to retain talent, since revenue reflects value created
  2. BDefer a substantial portion of bonuses over several years in equity-linked form, subject to malus and clawback, and base the pool on risk-adjusted performanceCorrect
  3. CPay the entire bonus upfront but cap it at a multiple of base salary
  4. DLink bonuses to the number of trades executed to encourage activity within limits

Explanation

Sound practice ties pay to risk-adjusted results, defers part of it so outcomes can emerge, and allows malus/clawback if losses appear. A cap on upfront cash does not adjust for risk or time horizon, and raising cash on revenue or rewarding trade count increases risk-taking incentives.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Governance questions