FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Monitoring Liquidity
A bank reports the following contractual cash flows (USD million) for the 0-30 day bucket: asset inflows of 480 and liability outflows of 620. Over the next bucket (31-90 days), inflows are 350 and outflows are 300. The bank has no other flows. What are the periodic gap for the 31-90 day bucket and the cumulative gap at the end of 90 days?
The 31-90 day periodic gap is +50 million (350 inflows minus 300 outflows), and the cumulative gap is -90 million, because the first bucket's -140 million shortfall is only partly offset by the +50 million surplus in the second bucket.
- APeriodic gap +50; cumulative gap -90Correct
- BPeriodic gap +50; cumulative gap +190
- CPeriodic gap -50; cumulative gap -190
- DPeriodic gap +50; cumulative gap -140
Explanation
Gap in the first bucket = 480 - 620 = -140. Second bucket = 350 - 300 = +50. Cumulative = -140 + 50 = -90. Option D forgets to add the second gap to the first in the cumulative figure, giving -140; option B uses the wrong sign on the first gap.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Monitoring Liquidity shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Monitoring Liquidity questions
- A bank has high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) of USD 90 million. Projected 30-day stressed cash outflows are USD 160 million and stressed inf…
- Which feature most clearly explains why liquidity risk can be self-reinforcing in a market-wide stress?
- A treasurer projects cash flows for the next 30 days. Contractual inflows are USD 500 million and contractual outflows are USD 620 million. …
- Which of the following is an example of a contingent source of liquidity risk, as opposed to a risk from contractual cash flows?
- During a market-wide stress, a bank finds that its funding sources dry up at the same time as the assets it planned to sell lose value and b…
- A liquidity risk manager reviews a gap report showing a large negative cumulative gap in the 0-7 day bucket but a large positive cumulative …