FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects
A bank trades three derivatives with a counterparty under a legally enforceable netting agreement. The trades have current mark-to-market values of +40 million, +25 million and -50 million to the bank. Ignoring collateral, what is the bank's current credit exposure to the counterparty?
The exposure is 15 million. Under an enforceable netting agreement the trade values are added together (40 + 25 - 50 = 15), and the positive net amount is the exposure. The figure of 65 million would apply only if there were no netting.
- A65 million
- B15 millionCorrect
- C40 million
- D50 million
Explanation
With enforceable netting, values are summed: 40 + 25 - 50 = 15 million, and exposure is max(15, 0) = 15 million. Without netting it would be 65 million, the sum of positive values only, which ignores the offset.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Netting, Close-out and Related Aspects questions
- A bank's netting agreement with a counterparty is found by legal opinion to be unenforceable in the counterparty's jurisdiction, and the cou…
- A bank and a hedge fund trade under an ISDA-style master agreement with close-out netting. The hedge fund defaults. Which statement best des…
- A bank has n identical trades with a counterparty, each with the same exposure volatility and pairwise correlation rho between trade values,…
- Bank B and Fund F have two netting sets under separate master agreements. Netting set 1 has a net value of +20 million to Bank B; netting se…
- Under a netting agreement enforceable in the relevant jurisdiction, Bank A has three terminated trades with a defaulting counterparty. The c…
- In insolvency law, how does set-off differ from close-out netting as risk mitigants for a creditor?